10-14-10 Planning Comm. Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 2010 AMEND "fhe City Planner reported that Neu Properties has requested an CUP - amendment to their Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor 3171 SPRUCE storage up to the maximum allowed by Code for property located at STREET - 3171 Spruce Sheet. The City Planner indicated that the site is NEU generally in compliance with the Code. The City's Code Enforcement PROI'EI2TIES Officer would like clarification, however, as to all possible locations where outdoor storage would occur so she can verify the outdoor storage percentage use of the property. The Code Enforcement Officer is also asking for clarification that all outdoor storage users occupy building space as well as more information on types of materials to be stored and height of that material. Additionally, dumpster locations should be noted on the plan to ensure that they are either within the outdoor storage area or screened. The Planner noted that staff is reconunending approval of the CUP Amendment subject to clarification of these items. Dail Neujahr, Neu Properties, indicated that he first received the CUP for his property in 1999 and is now updating it to meet current Code requirements. Neujahr reported that the storage areas marked on his site plan are the areas that will be used for outdoor storage. He did not foresee any changes given the drainage of his property dictates where storage can occur. Neujahr reported that dumpsters are located behind screening fences. Outdoor storage will consist of construction equipment and materials. Outdoor storage areas will be occupied by building tenants only with Neujahr indicated that his business occupies the building as does one other tenant. Neujahr reported that he would comply will all recommendations made by the Code Enforcement Officer. Duray asked if Neujahr planned to have storage containers on the site. Neujalu• indicated that he currently has two job site containers on the property. These containers are typically at job sites, but given the economy and slow business climate, are currently on his property. The City Planner noted that the Code requires a separate approval for storage containers. The job site containers on the property do not fall into this category. The Planner indicated that if Neujahr were to have storage containers on the site, he would have to come back to the City for another CLJP amendment. Barraclough asked about the paving of the outdoor storage area. The City Planner reported that the Council has been approving Class V, therefore, the Neu property would comply. Hall questioned the need for a revised site plan. The City Planner indicated that the Code Enforcement Officer wanted to ensure that all possible locations are indicated up to the maximum 60% of the site -3-