10-14-10 Planning Comm. Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 2010 remaining and a porch put on the front and north sides of the house, with the addition of a larger kitchen, dining room, and bedroom at the back of the house. The Planner indicated that in reviewing this proposal he assumed that the house was entirely new construction and did not realize that the existing house would remain. Andert reported that he would comply with all other recommendations contained in the City Planners report. The existing detached garage would be resided to match the expanded house. There would be no business use of the property. The City Planner suggested that if the existing detached garage is attached to the expanded house in some way, i.e. a breezeway, the 10% rear yard requirement would be eliminated. Andert reported that he would attach the existing detached garage. It was also pointed out to Andert that the existing shed on the property would have to he removed. Duray recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for total garage space of approximately 1,450 square feet for property located at 2829 Noel Drive, Gary and Nancy Anderl, subject to compliance with the recommendations of the City Planner as outlined in his report dated October 7, 2010 and subject to the existing detached garage being connected in some manner to the expanded house. Motion seconded by Fischer. Motion carried 4 - 0. AMENDMENT The City Planner reported that the Heritage Office Park Association is TO PUD requesting an Amendment to their PUD Permit to construct an accessory PERMIT - garage/storage building on Lot 6, Block 1, Heritage Office Park 3rd HERITAGE Addition. The Planner noted that this garage/storage building was a OFFICE PARK part of the original approval in the late 1990's, but was never constructed. "fhe concrete slab is in place, however. The building would be in an area under the Xcel J?nergy powerlines and, as such, Xcel Energy has some requirements relative to how the building is constructed. The Planner reported that Heritage Office Park would now like to proceed with the construction. fhe Planner reviewed approval conditions listed in his October 5, 2010 report one of which is that updated documents from Xcel )?nergy relative to this building be provided. The 1'lamrer noted that the building exterior is proposed to match the existing buildings in the office park, with stucco on the front and a fiber cement siding on the sides. The trash enclosure -5-