11-22-10 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 10, 2010 THE .25% issuance fee ($14,400) and the issuer will reimburse all the City's MAYFIELD costs associated with this process. The City Administrator reported that the nature of this financing does not require a public hearing, but does require City pass a resolution of approval. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2010-11-277 APPROVING A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SENIOR HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (PHS/MAYFIELD, LLC PROJECT), SERIES 2010 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. PATHWAY The City Administrator reported that Mr. Jon Lensing at 3040 Ontario REIMBURSE Road is requesting reimbursement of $684 for repaving the City's MENT pathway that abuts his driveway. As part of the Ontario Road LENSING improvement project, the City Engineer agreed that a section of PROPERTY pathway of approximately 6 feet by 17 feet needed to be replaced at the City's cost. However, Mr. Lensing preferred that the entire section of pathway adjacent to his driveway be replaced for consistency. That replacement resulted in an additional $361.68 in cost that the City did not agree to prior to replacement. The Administrator reported that an offer was made to Mr. Lensing to divide the additional cost equally, $180.84 for each party. However, Mr. Lensing feels that given the circumstances he should be reimbursed this cost in full. Jon Lensing reported that he has been in discussions with the City Engineer on this issue and prior to the work being done, the Engineer indicated that it was OK to proceed with the replacement with the details to be worked out later. The Engineer then agreed that the first 17 feet should be at the City's cost, but no reimbursement for the additional section of pathway adjacent to the driveway. Mr. Lensing felt that not to replace the entire section in discussion would have resulted in a terrible appearance. He also reported that he has lived next to the pathway for the past 22 years and has replaced at least 8 to 10 rails in the City's split rail fence at his own cost. Mr. Lensing also indicated that based on his calculations, the cost for the additional pathway replacement was $684, rather than the $361.68 stated by the Administrator. The Administrator indicated that the City Engineer's calculation of the cost was based on project quantities, rather than the cost basis Mr. Lensing was charged for his driveway replacement. 9