My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2007 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
02-14-2007 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2011 1:23:49 PM
Creation date
11/9/2011 1:18:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
professional engineer with experience in roof coverings and structurally stability to <br />determine if the minimum design loads of the building are still being met. <br />During my inspection of the additions constructed on the outside of the building, it is <br />noted that proper support for the roof panels is lacking and flashings are missing between <br />the wall and roof intersection. <br />Corrective Action: Per MSBC Section 1311.0411 Section 411.1 Structural safety, submit a <br />report from a registered design professional detailing whether the roof structure is sound and can <br />safely support the loads it was designed for and to provide the properweatherization. If repairs <br />are needed, the proper approvals must be given before commencing any work. <br />Structural Stability- MSBC Section 1311.0411 The minimum design loads for the <br />structure shall be the loads applicable at the time the building was constructed provided <br />no dangerous condition is created. In reviewing the address file for the property I could <br />not locate plans or specifications indicating how the building was designed or <br />constructed. While the building code does not specify the design method used by the <br />engineer, it does intend that the design method used be rational and in accordance to <br />well- established principles of mechanics. The code requires that the design resist snow <br />loads as well as the dead loads created by the building components such as lumber, <br />sheetrock, flooring, mechanical /plumbing equipment and the like. <br />Roof structural supports and braces most likely designed to resist lateral forces <br />have been cut above several doors and above mezzanine areas to provide clearance. I <br />believe these braces are an integral part of the roof /wall connection and must not be <br />compromised unless approved by the design professional. <br />Mezzanine areas have been constructed without plans or any review and approval <br />from the code official. These areas are being used for storing automobile parts, truck <br />parts and associated equipment on top which impose very large live loads on the floors <br />and create maximum stresses on the structural members. While office floors must be <br />designed to support a minimum of 50 pounds per square foot, storage areas shall be <br />designed to support as much as 250 pounds per square foot due to the heavy weight of the <br />material and parts. The size of the framing members, defects in the supporting members, <br />and the connection to the surrounding structure is not adequate to support the live and <br />dead loads on the mezzanine and is in danger of collapse. Structural members are <br />undersized and in one case broken while the joist hanger connection between members is <br />done be screws which are not allowed by the manufacturer. I believe the mezzanines are <br />overloaded and hazardous. <br />Shelving has been built inside the building and is connected to the exterior walls <br />and diagonal braces. This storage shelving increases the lateral stresses onto the wall and <br />roof. Review of the original manufactures installation instructions by the design <br />professional must be made in order to determine whether or not the fastening <br />requirements and acceptable load combinations for the shelving and roof are met. <br />Through the center of the building a wall was constructed which separates the <br />building into two different areas. The wood framed wall which could possibly be a fire <br />wall or shear wall has had a large opening cut into it approximately 8 feet high by 12 feet <br />wide in size. The design professional must be consulted in order to determine if the <br />- 2 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.