Laserfiche WebLink
easement. Without said documentation, the site plan shall be revised to remove <br />the garage structure. <br />2. If documentation allowing the garage structure within the easement area is <br />provided, the applicant shall submit building elevations for review, subject to <br />approval of the City Council. <br />Some evidence appears to exist which supports the requested easement encroachment <br />(in the form of a 1980 encroachment license with NSP). As a condition of PUD <br />amendment approval however, updated (current) documentation should be provided <br />from Xcel Energy which would make an allowance for the proposed building <br />encroachment. Such documentation will be subject to review by the City Attorney. <br />Building Height. The proposed accessory building measures 10 feet in height, well <br />within the maximum 40 foot height requirement imposed in the I -P District. Beyond the <br />City's minimum requirements, it should be understood that the proposed accessory <br />structure may be subject to additional height limitations imposed by Xcel Energy. <br />Setbacks. The location of the proposed accessory structure is consistent with that <br />depicted upon the previously approved development plan. The structure will be setback <br />40 feet from Desoto Street and 15 feet from the adjacent office building to the north. <br />Building Materials. The east fagade of accessory structure (which faces Desoto <br />Street) is to be finished in stucco to match existing Heritage Park office buildings. In <br />addition, the base of the elevation is to be finished in brick. The north, south and west <br />sides of the building are to be finished in cement board siding. The applicant has <br />indicated that building colors will match the existing office buildings. <br />Lying beneath an overhead transmission line, it is possible that Xcel Energy may <br />impose some additional requirements in regard to building materials, particularly in <br />regard to the use of flammable materials. <br />Trash. As shown on the submitted site plan, a trash storage area is proposed on the <br />south side of the building. According to the applicant, a "trash wall" will be provided to <br />screen trash handling equipment. As a condition of PUD amendment approval, it is <br />suggested that a "wing wall" be extended along the south and east sides of the trash <br />handling area. Such wall should be an extension of the accessory storage building and <br />utilize similar finish materials. <br />Parking Supply. As part of the City's original, 1995 review of the project, it was <br />determined that a total of 117 off- street parking stalls are required of the office park and <br />that 119 stalls are provided. It is staff's understanding from the applicant that the <br />proposed building will not displace any of the originally approved parking area. As a <br />condition of PUD amendment approval, not less than 117 off - street parking stalls must <br />be provided upon the subject site. <br />Future Lot Sale. As separate condominium units, it is conceivable that the <br />garage /storage structures could be sold separately from other parts of the office project. <br />2 <br />3 <br />