02-22-2012 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9, 2012 majority of the piece of property in question with within the flood zone of Gervais Lake. The City Planner recommended approval of the property division and combination as requested. Adrianne Kneeland, 695 County Road B -2, indicated that she and her husband would like to divide the parcel from their lot and give it to their daughter so that she has lake access. Kneeland acknowledged that this piece of land is unhuildable, but would provide her daughter's lot with lake access. Kneeland indicated that eventually she and her husband will be selling their property and they wanted to ensure that their daughter's property continued to have lake access. Barraclough indicated that he looked at the property and agreed that this would be a nice addition to the Greenbrier property, Duray asked if the Kneeland's had any issue with the Planner's recommendations. Kneeland asked if the parcel could remain separate and not be combined with the Greenbrier lot. The City Planner indicated that it would have to be combined in order to meet Code regulations. The City cannot create a parcel of land without street frontage. Kneeland asked about the recommendation that addresses metes and hounds legal description versus platting of the property. The City Planner indicated that in order to record the property division, the County may require the division be platted. This is an issue that the Kneeland's will have to address with the County. The Planner indicated that the Kneeland's surveyor can help them through this process. If a plat is required, an additional zoning action may be necessary. Kneeland asked about the requirement for dedication of easements. The City Planner noted that Code requires the dedication of parameter easements for property divisions. I -Ie indicated that the Kneeland's surveyor can describe those easements on the plat, or in the case of a metes and bounds property division get the easement descriptions to the City for preparation of an easement document. Kristen Taton, Greenbrier Circle, noted that they had no intention of putting a house on this property but asked if a shed or gazebo would be permissible. The City Planner replied that the property would be eligible for accessory buildings as long as they were not located within the flood zone. He suggested that Taton contact the Building Official for specific information. Barraclough recommended approval of the Subdivision of the northerly 75 feet of 695 County Road 13-2 and Combination of that 75 feet with 2389 Greenbrier Circle as requested by Mr. and Mrs. Kneeland subject to - 2 - 6