02-08-2006 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Front yard setback 30 feet * Side yard setback Jinterior) 10 feet * Side yard setback (corner) 30 feet Rear yard setback 30 feet * Building Height 30 feet * Lot 5 does not meet the minimum lot width requirement. According to the Ordinance, lot width is measured at the shortest horizontal distance between the side lot lines measured at right angles to the depth measured at the required minimum building setback line. When measured at the required setback line, the lot width is approximately 70 feet. As such the lot must be revised by at least 5 feet to meet the minimum lot requirement of the Ordinance. It would appear that slight adjustments to Lots 4 and 6 could be made to meet the requirements on all lots. * The applicant has identified drainage and utility easements for each lot however, no building pads are shown. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to revise the preliminary plat to indicate the building pad locations. The locations of all building pads must conform to the setback requirements of the Ordinance. Additionally, as a condition of approval, Lot 1 of Block 1 will be required to gain access from the internal location off the cul -de -sac. Streets and Access. Access to the site will occur off of Old County Road C. The applicant is proposing a cul -de -sac with a landscaped island and pond. The cul -de -sac meets the length requirement, however, the design is unique as this layout has not been used in other Little Canada streets. As indicated in the concept plan, the advantages are primarily aesthetic, as the island eliminates a large expanse of paved street area. However, maintenance can be an issue. The applicant is proposing 50 feet of r -o -w and 28 feet of paved surface. The turnaround includes 18 feet of paved surface. The turnaround area may be an issue for public works and general snow storage. Therefore, the overall street design and layout is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Landscaping. No landscaping plan has been submitted by the applicant. As discussed during the concept plan, along the railroad boundary the applicant was proposing to preserve the existing line of vegetation, and add a row of Spruce trees to increase the buffer. The new trees would be within the right of way. This planting plan must be reviewed and approved by Public Works. Landscaping and maintenance of the right of way in this area should also must be addressed in the Developer Agreement. Typically, it is the responsibility of the fronting property owner to mow the grass and maintain the boulevard portion of the right of way. 2