My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-25-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-25-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 1:58:59 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 11:16:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />the licensing program to include crime prevention participation in Crime Free Multi- housing <br />programs was mandatory. A few went even farther by establishing standards relating to calls per <br />unit for police and fire activity. In cases where the calls were above a stated standard, a <br />"provisional license" was issued that required the property owner /manager to submit a mitigation <br />plan aimed at reducing inappropriate activity. <br />Inspections include the general premises and individual units. In talking with these cities, some <br />inspect every unit of a complex on a set schedule ranging for bi- annually to once every four <br />years. Others determined the level of unit inspection based on a random sample of units <br />inspected. If general compliance was discovered in the random inspections, then they did not go <br />through every unit. However, if serious problems were encountered, then each unit was <br />inspected. <br />Attached are two ordinances that focus on the two primary approaches to this issue. The first <br />belongs to Brooklyn Park. They establish an extensive inspection program to ensure the rental <br />units are maintained in appropriate condition. They also establish provisions for defining <br />"disorderly premises ". Being deemed a "disorderly premise" starts a notification process (see <br />page 23 of 29). The first notice defines the violation and directs the licensee to make corrective <br />action. A second violation on the premises within three months of the first one generates another <br />notice and requires the licensee to submit a written report of proposed to be taken to prevent <br />further disorderly use of the premises within five days of receipt of the City's notice. A third <br />violation within three months of any of the two previous instances of disorderly use allows the <br />City to deny, revoke, suspend or not renew a licensee, subject to provisions of a public hearing <br />before the City Council. (Shoreview has a similar ordinance.) <br />The second ordinance belongs to Brooklyn Center. It is very similar to the previous ordinance as <br />far as "disorderly use ". However, this ordinance adds a "provisional license" for a complex has <br />more than .65 police /fire calls per unit per year. (See page 12 -20.) In this case, they cannot <br />obtain a regular license until their calls for service drop below the threshold for a one -year <br />period. (Note: Calls related to domestic abuse may not be counted pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statute 504B.205 — copy attached.) A provisional license also requires the submission of a <br />"mitigation plan" that is to be approved after review by the City Council. The Council may <br />conditionally approve subject to written findings. The licensee may also request a hearing before <br />the Council on this matter. Once approved, the licensee must submit a monthly status report to <br />the City. Failure to comply with the provisions of the mitigation plan are grounds for <br />suspension, revocation, or decline to renew of a license. (Note: This ordinance was based on <br />one in effect in New Brighton.) <br />I talked with Brooklyn Center and New Brighton about the impact these ordinances have had on <br />their calls for service. Brooklyn Center said the ordinance is less than one year old and has not <br />yet been evaluated. They only have one provisional license and it is for a smaller complex. <br />New Brighton said the housing maintenance ordinance was adopted back in the 1970's. The <br />provisional license piece is relatively new. (Less than two years.) They have only recently <br />funded a Crime Free Multi- housing position in Public Safety that helps address the provisional <br />license component. Three properties were provisionally licensed on the initial go- round. <br />However, all are now licensed on a standard license. The official in charge of inspections feels it <br />has made a great difference in housing maintenance in New Brighton. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.