Laserfiche WebLink
any zoning change were to be considered, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan (the <br />property is currently guided for low density use) and a rezoning would be needed in addition to <br />platting requirements. Both of these actions also require public hearings. <br />The Planner then reviewed various development concepts starting with single family (see <br />materials attached). He noted that the minimum lot width pursuant to City Code is 75 feet. The <br />minimum lot area is 10,000 square feet. The concept he presented provided for 13 single - family <br />homes with a common frontage road to avoid separate driveway access to Twin Lake Boulevard. <br />All the lots have lot areas in excess of 13,000 square feet. <br />The second concept reviewed by the Planner was for a townhome development. He again noted <br />that comp plan amendments, rezoning, and subdivision approvals would be necessary for any <br />uses beyond single family. In this sketch, a common access road is provided on the north side of <br />the site. The road solves conflict issues for Twin Lake Boulevard and helps buffer the new <br />development for the mobile home park to the north. The concept also left a substantial front yard <br />area and would help protect more of the existing trees on the site, subject to grading <br />requirements. There were 29 units proposed in this layout. The Planner also noted that this <br />layout provides for better connection possibilities to the Five Star access road given its location <br />is further to the north of the road's intersection with Twin Lake Boulevard. <br />The last concept for was for senior housing, specifically senior coops based on a developer <br />approaching the City a few months ago. Greater density is possible with this type of concept due <br />to its vertical nature. 36 units are shown on the sketch with significant land remaining. It is <br />theoretically possible to double the unit count based on the size of the parcel. More study would <br />be needed to develop a specific layout. It was also noted that the view from a multi -story <br />building might not be the best from this site. <br />Don Williams asked about the County's "fly- over" road proposal. The City Administrator stated <br />this idea is not being pursued. Mr. Williams then noted the traffic congestion at the intersection <br />of Vadnais Boulevard and Rice Street. He stated further development in this area, including the <br />new charter school, would only make that problem worse. The City Administrator commented <br />that Vadnais Boulevard is proposed to be re- routed to the north along Lake Vadnais to eliminate <br />the conflict with the 694 interchange at Rice Street. He also noted that while this may not occur <br />for some time, there is another exit from this area, especially now that the Edgerton Bridge has <br />re- opened. <br />Mr. Williams then asked what the density the townhomes were proposed at. The Planner stated <br />the concept was based on six units per acre, which is pretty common for that type of <br />development. It is not considered overly dense. <br />The City Administrator asked for preferences for development from those present. Mr. Dircks <br />stated he could live with any of the concepts as long as they are done right. <br />Staff then stated they were likely to recommend a townhome development due to the following <br />factors: <br />• Allows for better screening /buffering from Five Star Estates <br />• Higher density should provide more ability to address extra costs associated with <br />access road, buffering, and the lift station. <br />-2- <br />