My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
11-09-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 2:29:18 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 3:22:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Fund: <br />• Clean -up day program modified to an every -other year basis with an increased <br />subsidy. The appliance pickup would continue on an annual basis. The clean -up <br />day fees would be restructured so that the first two electronic items, tires, etc. are <br />free with the appropriate charge thereafter. Charges for general loads will be free <br />up to a reasonable limit. See attachment A for 2005 fees. We feel that this type of <br />fee structure will encourage greater participation while putting a cap on the <br />excessive use. We have reflected zero cost for 2006 clean -up day with the <br />intention of having odd year clean -ups. <br />Impact = $2,500 <br />• It is believed that staff duties can be realigned to accomplish the housing <br />inspector program in- house, so the expense is removed from the budget. <br />Impact = $25,000 <br />• Increase the liquor license fees as reflected in exhibit B. <br />Impact = $4,500 <br />• All individual expense line items were reviewed. This resulted in both increases <br />and decreases in varying amounts. The net change due to this overall review was <br />a $2,987 increase in cost. <br />Impact = ($2,987) <br />• The same process was completed for revenue line items and that resulted in a net <br />decrease in revenue. <br />Impact = ($578) <br />• The full MSA maintenance allowance was allocated to the General Fund. This <br />was done to match the maintenance revenue with the increasing cost of street <br />maintenance, especially seal- coating. The levy amount of property taxes was <br />decreased in the General Fund and the levy amount for the infrastructure fund was <br />increased by the same figure. <br />Impact = $0 <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.