Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 25, 1989 <br />Rezoning <br />Frattalone <br />Property <br />(Cont.) <br />City require the property be rezoned to I -P at that time. <br />Fahey suggested that the City consider rezoning the property to PUD <br />using the conditions of the I -1 District as the underlying zoning, <br />but requiring that if there is a lot split, the property must conform <br />to I -P standards. <br />The Council also discussed the possibility of placing a deed restriction <br />or restrictive covenants on the property. <br />The City Attorney reported that if deed restrictions or restrictive <br />covenants are used, the City should enter into an agreement with <br />Frattalone that the restrictions could not be changed or eliminated <br />unless there is agreement by the City. <br />Fahey felt the zoning of the property to PUD would be a cleaner alternative. <br />Fahey pointed out that the City would have the option of being more liberal <br />if it chose to be. <br />Frattalone pointed out that Councils change and he did not want to be <br />faced dealing with a different Council on this matter that may not have <br />the same viewpoint as the existing Council. <br />The City Planner stated that he would like the opportunity to consider <br />the effects a PUD zoning would have on the property as well as the <br />City. The Planner thought that the proposal might work, but wanted <br />more time to think about it. <br />There was no one else from the general public present wishing to comment <br />on this matter. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 89 -1 -33 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON THE FRANK FRATTALONE REQUEST FOR <br />REZONING OF PROPERTY ALONG SPRUCE STREET FROM <br />I -P DISTRICT TO I -1 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, LaValle, Collova, Blesener. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 21, Page 35. <br />Blesener felt that a depth of 300 feet back from South Owasso was <br />sufficent for the I -P lot. <br />Scalze felt that 350 feet in depth would be better. <br />Blesener pointed out that 350 feet may prohibit the remainder of the <br />Frattalone property from ever being split. Blesener suggested that <br />Page -13- <br />