05-11-2004 Council Workshop Agenda

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council April 26, 1989 6• Frank C.attalone ?zoning rase Agenda :em No. 9 Sb(eoo S1)vt4te RESOLUTION NO. 89 -4 -161 - APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BINGO LICENSE RENEWAL AS SUBMITTED BY THE NORTH SUBURBAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Collova. Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, Fahey, Blesener, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Matson reported that the Little Canada Recreation Association has three members on the North Suburban Youth Association Board, and these members have been appreciated for their input. Blesener reported that action was previously tabled by the Council on the Frank Frattalone request for rezoning to give the City Planner an opportunity to meet with Mr. Frattalone on the issue. The City Planner reported that Mr. Frattalone is requesting that his property be rezoned from I -P to I -1 with the exception of the 233 feet of property on South Owasso Blvd. The Planner reported that the Council was concerned about the possibility of a third lot being split from the property that would not meet I -P standards. This is the area where Mr. Frattalone's outdoor storage is now located. The Planner reported that he has reviewed four different scenarios of the situation. The first encompasses retaining I -P zonina along South Owasso to a depth of 253 feet. This would leave 2.3 acres of property south of the site of Mr. Frattalone's existing building that could be split in the future. The second scenario moved the depth of I -P zoning on South Owasso to 353 feet, which would leave 1.7 acres of property that could be split into a third lot. The third sQE ?ra-rro suggests I -P zoning for the entire parcel with the exception of the lot' suggested by the Planner for the existing building. The fourth scenario suggests leaving the entire parcel I -P, which is objectionable to Mr. Frattalone. The Planner stated that Frattalone also objected to the third scenario since his storage yard would be located on I -P property and would be considered non - conforming. The Planner stated that the location of the south line of the I -1 zoning really does not make a difference since in either case, as outlined in scenario 1 or 2, there is the possibility of splitting a third lot. The Planner pointed out that the proposal for a landsplit would have to be reviewed and acted upon by the City Council. Frank Frattalone stated that he would he most comfortable with establishing the depth of the I -P zoning at 253 feet. Scalze suggested the 353 feet, since the potential third lot would already be zoned I -P and this might avoid some problems in the future. Page -15-