Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTTS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 30, 2008 <br />would be his assumption that there was not an environmental justice issue <br />since MN DOT deleted the wall. <br />Keis asked how long the wall would be. The Administrator estimated its <br />length at just over 500 feet. The wall would be solely in front of the <br />Quebec Apartments, not in front of any of the commercial businesses. <br />Allan questioned how effective this wall would be. The City <br />Administrator reported that Mr. Zinner has informed him that MN DOT <br />has indicated that there would be a reduction in decibel level which would <br />translate into an 80% reduction in noise. <br />The Administrator noted that the Council's concern with this section of <br />wall was from an aesthetic standpoint. Blesener agreed and noted that it <br />was thought that given the wall was short and the area open to the freeway <br />at both ends, noise reduction would be minimal. <br />Keis asked what would happen to the wall if the property were <br />redeveloped as commercial in the future. The City Administrator <br />suggested that the buyer would be aware of the wall, and removal would <br />likely be at the buyer's cost. Allan pointed out the previous Council <br />discussion of the likelihood that the property would be redeveloped. The <br />Administrator stated that given the surrounding uses, the property has the <br />potential to redevelop. However, given the economics of redeveloping an <br />apartment building, it may not be feasible to redevelop this property. <br />Allan asked what the City's arguments would be for MN DOT's paying <br />for the wall. The Administrator noted that MN DOT had indicated that the <br />deletion of the wall was unlikely given the environmental justice issues. <br />MN DOT did not make it clear to the City that they would delete the wall. <br />The cost of the wall was a part of the Unweave the Weave budget, noting <br />that two sections of wall were deleted, thus MN DOT realized a savings <br />on the one section. Blesener noted that MN DOT would not allow the <br />City to trade one section of wall for another, thus any deletions were cost <br />savings to MN DOT. <br />The Administrator thought that MN DOT would be willing to work with <br />the City on this issue. <br />Ted Zinner, Quebec Partners, reported that his firm has owned and <br />managed Quebec Apartments for the past 25 years. Zinner felt that the <br />noise wall issues to be considered are whether or not the wall would be <br />effective, cost effective, and whether or not the State will revisit the issue <br />with the City. Zinner reported that he has discussed the noise wall with <br />MN DOT. He has learned that the wall would be 535 feet in length, and <br />would be an effective noise barrier. The Environmental Assessment that <br />was done indicated that the noise reduction would be from 72 decibels to <br />