My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-19-2001 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
12-19-2001 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:39:30 PM
Creation date
6/25/2012 11:32:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Howard R. Green Company <br />Project No. 815920J <br />XI. FINANCING <br />Feasibility Study <br />2002 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvements <br />Little Canada, Minnesota <br />........................... <br />702,500.00 <br />260 000.00 <br />Construction Cost <br />City OH & Contingencies <br />Total Project Cost <br />A. STREET RECONSTRUCTION <br />962;500.00 <br />Based on the City Assessment Policy that governs street reconstruction/ <br />rehabilitation, the primary method of financing street improvements is to assess <br />the adjacent property owners on a front foot basis. The actual assessable cost of <br />a rural street reconstruction to an urban section is 85% of the cost based on an <br />urban section consisting of concrete curb and gutter, three inches of bituminous, <br />and eight inches of aggregate base for the actual width of the street up to 30 feet. <br />The City also has set a cap on the assessment rate that can be charged per front <br />foot for an urban, residential street. It is proposed that the cap be set at $48.50 <br />for this project. This is a $1.25 increase from the 2001 maximum assessment <br />rate due to inflation. <br />The City has determined that seeding lawn areas disturbed by construction <br />rather than sodding could realize a significant cost savings and provide a more <br />effective means on restoration. On past projects sod that has been installed will <br />last through the first season and then die during a winter, whereas grass from <br />seed will only go dormant. It is being proposed that if seeding is used instead of <br />sodding by decision of the property owners, the maximum assessment rate be <br />reduced by $1.50 per front foot. This change to the policy would need to be <br />approved by the City Council. City forces using their hydro seeder to increase <br />the cost savings would perform the seeding operation. <br />The actual assessable cost of a street serving commercial properties is 80% of <br />the project cost, excluding storm sewer, and 100% of the concrete curb and <br />gutter cost. The City has set a cap on the assessment rate that can be charged <br />per front foot for an urban, commercial street. It is proposed that the cap be set <br />at $86.75 for this project. This maximum rate has been increased $1.75 from <br />2001 due to inflation. <br />In addition to commercial assessments, the realignment/reconstruction of Market <br />Place Drive can be funded through the use of Municipal State Aid funds. The <br />actual funding amounts can vary from project to project and must be approved by <br />the Mn /DOT State Aid Office. This type of funding was used for the <br />reconstruction of Little Canada Road. Eligible funding items typically include all <br />street work, a portion or all of the storm sewer cost, and street lighting. <br />B. WATERMAIN <br />Based on the Watermain Assessment Policy, the sole method of financing the <br />installation of a six -inch watermain and related appurtenances shall be borne by <br />the affected property owners. The preferred method of assessment, as stated in <br />the City's Watermain Assessment Policy, would be on a "per lot" basis. Any <br />costs associated with over - sizing the watermain are typically borne by the City. It <br />9 <br />PAGE 181 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.