My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2001 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
11-14-2001 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:37:02 PM
Creation date
6/25/2012 1:04:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 -9 -2001 <br />Dear Council... <br />Since I came to work for the City of Little Canada in April, about seven months <br />ago, I have been busy learning the job and the "players." It is my belief that it is <br />far better to achieve compliance with our codes and ordinances by talking with <br />people, encouraging them, and suggesting possible solutions rather than taking a <br />badge -heavy "tag `em and let `em tell it to the judge" approach. Unless there is <br />some serious health hazard or other immediate concern, I will always give at least <br />two written warnings, and attempt to talk with the person before I resort to issuing <br />citations. When it is necessary to issue a citation, I will always have all the <br />evidence I need to make the charge stick. It is very embarrassing to lose a case due <br />to poor preparation. In my twenty-two years with the Ramsey County Sheriff's <br />Department I did lose twice. Both times it was because the judge chose to be <br />lenient, not because I didn't prove my case. <br />I have only issued four citations since I started. They were issued to people <br />who chose to ignore my letters and verbal warnings. Three have been very long <br />term problems. The other one was for not having a fence around a below ground <br />swimming pool, an obvious safety issue. In many cases the violations have been <br />existing and building for years. Some of those take a while to bring into <br />compliance. My standard of expectation for such people has been that they make <br />"significant, weekly progress towards compliance." This approach has been <br />successful in cases like Benchmark Auto in the industrial park. Benchmark had <br />been in violation for a long time. It took five months and holding back approval of <br />a business license, but we did achieve compliance, and that businessman is not <br />mad at the city. <br />Where this approach doesn't work I always have the option of writing the tag. I <br />had to do that with Dan's Auto Repair. Mr. Winner spent much time dragging his <br />feet and would only move under the threat of a citation. He reached a point where <br />he would not do anymore clean up of his site (the old Stenger Auto Body on <br />Centerville Rd.). I had no choice but to cite him. That case is still pending. <br />A similar situation existed with Jacobsen's Excavating in the Ryan Industrial <br />Park. The Jacobsen property was the worst in the industrial park. Jacobsen <br />ignored my first three letters. We have been in court. Jacobsen plead guilty to a <br />single count of maintaining a public nuisance. He was fined $100, with a <br />suspended sentence of $700 and 30 d.ys. The suspension is contingent upon <br />cleaning up all public nuisance issues within 30 days, completing paving and <br />landscaping by 6 -30 -2002, and no same or similar offenses within one year. By <br />Page 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.