Laserfiche WebLink
The last sign in question was Jackson and Lake StreetSome of the key considerations involving <br />this stop sign are as follows: <br />♦ During the improvement hearing process, residents in the vicinity of Lakeshore, Old <br />County Road C, and Jackson Street asked for stop signs at the two 90° turns as well as a <br />stop sign where Lake Street intersected with Jackson Street. Concerns with putting stop <br />signs at the 90° curves were related to noise, pollution, and increased driver frustration. <br />It was also felt that with the curb and gutter at those two areas, the radius people were <br />using to make those turns would be greatly reduced thereby slowing traffic. <br />♦ Bill Bruce and Harold Feickert expressed additional concern about the need for a stop <br />sign at Jackson and Lake Street. The primary emphasis was concern for children <br />crossing from the path across Jackson in order to access the Nadeau Wildlife Park. <br />♦ There was significant discussion from a number of residents about attempting to <br />discourage traffic from using this route. Stop signs were one method they felt could help <br />accomplish this. <br />♦ During the improvement hearing process, there was also discussion about deadending <br />Jackson Street to eliminate it as a through street. Some of the neighbors expressed <br />Concern over that concept due to emergency vehicle access. <br />♦ Speed bumps were also requested in this area as a method to slow traffic. <br />♦ A three -way stop at Jackson and Lake Street was authorized by the Council on March 23, <br />1994. <br />♦ Petition received on June 19, 1995 from residents in the vicinity of Old County Road C <br />and Jackson Street asking for increased speed enforcement on that section of roadway. <br />♦ In June of 1995, we received a petition asking for removal of the stop sign at Jackson and <br />Lake Street. We received a total of 254 signatures. Consideration was tabled for one <br />year so that further evaluation could occur on the impact of the reconstructed roads and <br />the signage was having on traffic in that area. <br />♦ The City evaluated the placement of a signal light at Demont and Rice Street to make it <br />easier for traffic to exit the area via Rice Street rather than through this neighborhood. <br />The State of Minnesota informed us that a stoplight was not warranted at this <br />intersection. There was also concern expressed that even if a stop light were placed in <br />that location, people still would not use that route to the freeway given the number of <br />metered ramps and lights they would have to go through to access 35E. <br />♦ At our June 28, 1995 meeting, three reasons were mentioned for installing the stop sign at <br />Jackson and Lake Street. The first was for the safety of the children crossing the park. <br />The second was to reduce traffic speeds on Jackson Street, and the third was to encourage <br />traffic to use Demont rather than Jackson /Old C/Lakeshore for access to the freeway. <br />♦ In June of 1996, we revisited this matter to determine if stop signs were needed at the two <br />90° curves as well as if the one should continue at Jackson and Lake Street. Traffic <br />Deputy Barry Vaughan recommended that we continue with the stop sign at Jackson and <br />Lake Street, but that no additional stop signs were necessary at the two 90 degree curves. <br />It was noted in Deputy Vaughan's report that 86.14% of the vehicles through this area <br />were traveling at less than 30 miles per hour with less than 1% at 11 or more miles over <br />the speed limit. <br />Attached are the minutes from June 10, 1996 when this matter was last discussed by the <br />Council. The Council will need to decide as to how they would like to proceed. <br />page 229 <br />