Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />try Council <br />1 Oct. 26, 1983 <br />Appendix E <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. Fahey agreed and pointed out that the gentlemen contacted the <br />City prior to the 27th of September. <br />Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its>,adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 83 -10 -511 — EXEMPTING MR. BILL <br />SCHIFSKY AND MR. DAVID GERMER FROM THE REQUIREMENT <br />OF APPENDIX E THAT A SPRINKLER SYSTEM BE INSTALLED <br />IN AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING OVER 2,000 SQUARE FEET <br />IN SIZE DUE TO A HARDSHIP CAUSED BY SCHEDULING <br />AS THESE TWO PARTIES HAD PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED <br />PLACEMENT ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR ITS <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 1983 MEETING AND HAD BULDING PLANS <br />READY FOR THAT MEETING, HOWEVER, THE ADMINISTRATIVE <br />AGENDA WAS FULL; PLANS WERE THEN CONSIDERED AT <br />THE SEPTEMBER 28, 1983 :MEETING AND APPROVED; <br />ALSO AT NO TIME PRIOR TO THE SEPTEMBER 28 :IEETINQ <br />HAD THE REQUIREMENT OF A SPRINKLER SYSTEM BEEN <br />CONVEYED TO THESE PARTIES <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Forsberg, Hanson, Scalze, Nardini, Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 9, Pages 556 and 557. <br />Mr. Fahey suggested that Ms. Olson bring the Appendix E matter up <br />at the Legislature and try to get some changes made without taking <br />the teeth out of this legislation. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 83 -10 -512 — REFERRING APPENDIX E <br />BACK TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE FIRE CHIEF <br />ASKING FOR THEIR IMPUT GIVEN THE APPLICATIONS or <br />APPENDIX E AND ITS IMPACT ON THE SMALL BUSINESSES <br />IN THE CITY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Hanson, Scalze, Nardini, Forsberg. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 9, page 55A. <br />Page 19 <br />