My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-2026 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
04-22-2026 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2026 1:40:16 PM
Creation date
5/14/2026 1:39:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 22, 2026 <br />CONSIDER FEE INCREASE FOR 2026 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES <br />The City Clerk provided background information on the annual two percent fee increase, noting that <br />this will be the third year that the increase has been implemented. Notices were sent to all on -sale <br />liquor license holders, and no calls or questions were received. <br />Mayor Fischer opened the public hearing for comments from the general public. <br />There were no comments from the public. Upon motion by Miller, seconded by Malone, the public <br />hearing was closed. Ayes (3). Nays (0). Motion adopted. <br />Miller acknowledged the process that established the annual increase and commented that it has been <br />working well. <br />Mayor Fischer reopened the public hearing. <br />Tom Cossack, owner of Gordies Bar, asked why there is a meeting for the liquor license and whether <br />there is an increase for all the other licenses. He commented that a liquor license is no different than <br />any other business license. He stated that last May, he paid $5,758 for his liquor license and wrote <br />another check in October for $1,125. He noted that he is also required to pay the sales tax on <br />everything that is sold. He stated that he pays a lot of money for a license, and the business is not what <br />it once was. He noted that he has been here for 51 years, and 30 years ago, it was a big deal to have a <br />liquor license in Little Canada, but it is not the same now. He stated that if they are going to raise the <br />liquor license, they should raise all licenses. <br />The City Clerk stated that they used to raise the liquor license by the levy limit, then put that on hold, <br />and then changed it to two percent because the levy had gotten too high. She noted that many <br />businesses are not licensed. <br />Mr. Cossack commented that the liquor business is not as lucrative as it used to be and asked that the <br />City take a break on increasing the fee, or even reducing the increase to one percent. <br />Malone asked about the precedent for a liquor license fee in a city and whether it is related to the <br />potential increase in assistance from law enforcement. The City Clerk confirmed that law enforcement <br />costs is the main driver. Mr. Cossack commented that they do have very few issues that require law <br />enforcement, although he acknowledged that other businesses may require more assistance. <br />There were no additional comments from the public. Upon motion by Miller, seconded by Malone, the <br />public hearing was closed. Ayes (3). Nays (0). Motion adopted. <br />Mayor Fischer commented that he and the City Administrator recently had a discussion about <br />revisiting the process. He believed that the two percent annual increase is fair compared to the cost <br />increase for emergency services and public safety. He recalled that in the past, the liquor license <br />increase was tied to the levy, and then a pause on the increase occurred for a few years around COVID. <br />He stated that the fixed percentage allows businesses to budget for the increase rather than having a <br />larger increase after a few years. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.