My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1998 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
04-22-1998 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2012 2:47:57 PM
Creation date
10/24/2012 2:43:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 9, 1998 <br />Grabrick pointed out that the run -off from this property cannot be changed <br />as a result of its development. Grabrick stated that he would like to see <br />the engineering impact that this development will have as well as a <br />concrete plan for addressing drainage. <br />The City Planner pointed out that the Commission has engineering <br />comments on the Plan A drainage plan. This plan requires that easements <br />be dedicated from the adjacent property owner. The Planner indicated that <br />it is not possible to debate Plan B or Plan C without engineering <br />comments. <br />The Planner further stated that it was his understanding that a three lot <br />development could be accommodated without widening the existing road <br />system. Additional lots may require consideration for widening the street <br />to meet City standards. <br />The Planner suggested that the Planning Commission may wish to <br />consider the policy within the Comp Plan which suggests that the <br />character of the area can be considered in making a decision on a <br />development request. <br />Knudsen pointed out that it appears it is not feasible to widen the loop <br />section of the road, <br />The Planner replied that he did not have that information. <br />Manteuffel again pointed out that there is a pipeline easement in the <br />Highway 36 right -of -way. <br />Schletty felt that resolution of the drainage questions was the number one <br />issue. Schletty felt that the property owners in the area would have a good <br />knowledge of existing drainage conditions. Schletty was concerned that <br />there are three different drainage plans being proposed at this time. <br />DeLonais pointed out that resolution of the drainage issue can be a <br />condition of Preliminary Plat approval, <br />Montour pointed out that drainage has the biggest impact on proposed <br />Lot 1. Montour asked if the plat consisted of three lots, if Lot 1 could be <br />developed. The Planner replied that a three lot development will provide <br />more space to address on -site ponding. Drainage Plan A would require <br />that Mr. Kimmes obtain a ponding easement from the property owner to <br />the west. <br />Page 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.