My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2024 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
11-14-2024 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2026 8:40:25 PM
Creation date
6/22/2026 8:39:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />NOVEMBER 14, 2024 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />Commissioner Haluptzok stated that perhaps the mini storage site could be distinguished because <br />it is a gated and private parking area compared to a public retail parking lot. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson stated that she would tend to think the signs would be fine in a driveway or <br />parking area. <br /> <br />Mr. Wyland stated that they have not had an issue with ice or snow, noting that they are located <br />in a lot of parking lots or driveways. He guessed in the case of the mini storage that the sign was <br />perhaps there first and the buildings were then constructed as they typically would want to be a <br />bit more out of the way. <br /> <br />Commissioner Masrud commented that he would support lowering the number of allowed signs <br />to two as he does not like billboards very much in general. He stated that perhaps it is not much <br />of an issue given the buffer zones and where signs could be located. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director commented that the likely placement would be along 694 <br />near the Vadnais sign that almost encroaches on the border, as signs outside of the city <br />jurisdiction would not count in the buffer requirement. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson moved to permanent signage and asked for comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Masrud referenced the integral signs and asked for clarification, as six square feet <br />is a small size. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director stated that in his experience the integral signage is <br />typically used for churches with the date established. He noted that is more of an architectural <br />feature in addition to the wall signage. He stated that they could clarify that under six square feet <br />would not require a permit while over six square feet would require a permit. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson moved to temporary signs and welcomed input. <br /> <br />Commissioner Masrud stated that the math for temporary signage for new businesses does not <br />seem to work out. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director confirmed that does not and suggested removing the gap. <br /> <br />Commissioner Masrud agreed with eliminating the gap for new businesses. He commented that <br />the reorganization and clarification were great. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson asked if the Commission has a preference for 32 or 36 square feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kulousek suggested allowing up to 36 square feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.