06-10-2026 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JUNE 101, 2026 has increased the direct cost for the project; it is appropriate to pursue the bid bond claim. Schwalbach recognized that the bids were already slightly over the estimated project cost, so this continues to increase the project cost. The City Engineer stated that the sidewalk segment would be constructed with a future street project, if it were not done as part of this project and explained that the City was able to capitalize on grant funds to reduce the project cost and complete the project earlier. Schwalbach stated that if this scenario hardly ever happens, and this action will not tarnish the reputation of the city, he would support moving forward with the bid bond claim. He stated that if submission of the bid bond claim would tarnish the reputation of the city and discourage contractors from wanting to work with the city, he would not want to pursue that. Mayor Fischer echoed those comments and believed that it is worth pursuing, and then they can determine if it is worth filing. Malone asked and received confirmation that the funding from both Ramsey County and Little Canada would increase if the bid bond claim is not successful. Kwapick stated that it was his understanding that the bid bond is binding and the City would receive those funds. The City Engineer replied that the amount listed in the staff report is five percent of the bid, which is the maximum the City could request. He stated that he has never done this, nor has the City Attorney, but it should be successful. Kwapick stated that the project is extremely important for this corridor, as there are extreme mobility issues that exist. He recognized that it would be more money for the city, but it is still a value to complete this now compared to waiting another three years at a higher cost. Mayor Fischer agreed that he would not want to wait on this segment and wants to move forward. Schwalbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO.2026-6-86 — RESCINDING THE CONTRACT A WARD TO CLARK COMPANIES The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Kwapick. Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Schwalbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO.2026-6-87 — AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO THOMAS AND SONS CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $599,484.20 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Malone. Ayes (5). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. 7