My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2013 Planning Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
03-14-2013 Planning Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 12:49:34 PM
Creation date
3/8/2013 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The lot in question is nearly two acres in area, including three current lots that are being <br />combined with the main parcel. Thus, the 590 square foot existing detached garage <br />easily fits within the 10% rear yard allowance. The applicants state that the new <br />garage will meet all setbacks, and will sit on the southwest side of the existing home, <br />facing north toward Labore Road. <br />The lot size and extensive setbacks would suggest that the requirements of the <br />Conditional Use Permit are met, with the exception of the garage floor are limitation of <br />1,500 square feet. As noted, the applicants are seeking a variance to allow the total <br />garage space to exceed this limit by 8 square feet. <br />Variance Request <br />The dimensions of the proposed attached garage are listed as 34 feet wide across the <br />front and 27 feet deep. It is unclear if this depth dimension includes a "bump -out" <br />section in the middle of the rear wall. In any case, in support of the variance, the <br />applicants suggest that narrowing the garage below the 34 foot width would eliminate <br />the option to have 3 individual garage doors, causing an architectural problem in <br />coordinating the style of the garage with the historic home. <br />When considering a variance, the City is required to make the following findings: <br />• The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. <br />• The ordinance prohibits this manner of use. <br />• The proposed manner of use is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance <br />and with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />• The ordinance creates "practical difficulties" in achieving the manner of use. <br />• The difficulties are unique to the property and not created by the owner. <br />• The variance will not alter the essential character of the 'locality ". <br />In this case, it is difficult to find that there are practical difficulties in putting the property <br />to reasonable use, or that any such difficulties are not created by the applicant. In <br />addition, the requirements utilize a standard of uniqueness. <br />With regard to uniqueness, the applicants suggest that architecture and lot size are <br />unique to this particular property. Larger single family lots are not uncommon in Little <br />Canada, however, and the community has a variety of architectural styles. <br />Moreover, it would appear that shortening the depth of the garage by as little as 3 <br />inches would leave the building in compliance with the zoning ordinance standard <br />without variance. This reduction in depth would not affect the width (as it relates to the <br />garage door requirement), and would not appear to impact the practical use of the <br />garage. At just under 27 feet in depth, it would still be larger than necessary to <br />accommodate even large residential vehicles, along with storage and circulation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.