Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MAY 9, 1996 <br />ARCHITECTURAL <br />GUIDELINES - <br />BACKLIT <br />SIGNS <br />The Planner pointed out that the Council has asked for <br />the Planning Commission's input on Conditional Use <br />Permits for accessory buildings, and whether or not the <br />Commission felt there were any changes needed in the <br />ordinance. <br />The Commission discussed this issue and felt the <br />Conditional Use Permit process should be retained for <br />accessory buildings which bring total accessory space <br />over 1,000 square feet. The Commission felt that the <br />CUP process gave the City the control it needed to <br />review these situations on a case -by -case basis and <br />impose any conditions it feels necessary given the <br />particular situation. The Commission was also <br />comfortable with the 1,000 to 1,500 square foot range <br />which has been used as a guideline in acting on CUP <br />requests over the past few years. Therefore, it was <br />the consensus of the Commission to retain the existing <br />CUP process for accessory building area over 1,000 <br />square feet in size. <br />Keis reported that as he has been driving around, he <br />has noticed most freestanding signs are backlit. <br />Knudsen did not feel the City would want to discourage <br />business by prohibiting freestanding backlit signs. <br />Keis felt it was more acceptable along Rice Street, the <br />City's downtown area, to allow freestanding signs to be <br />backlit. <br />Carson . agreed, and felt the City should retain the <br />existing prohibition of backlit signs on buildings. <br />Knudsen agreed. <br />The Planner reported that he has looked at the <br />freestanding backlit sign at the Market Place, and it <br />doesn't look bad. However, he would have liked to see <br />a little better quality sign. <br />Knudsen pointed out the Planning Commission has always <br />agreed that quality and appearance is often more <br />important than use. Knudsen indicated that the <br />Commission wants to see quality development which is <br />aesthetically pleasing along Rice Street. <br />4 <br />Page 80 <br />