Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-23-1985 Council AgendaAGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 1. Call to Order ( 7:30 P.M. ) 2. Roll Call Mayor Michael Fahey Councilwoman Beverly Scalze Councilman Bill Blesener Councilman Rick Collova Councilwoman Mugs Nardini City Attorney Thomas Sweeney or City Engineer Donald Carley or City Planner David Licht or Building Inspector Bud Nagovsky Clerk /Treasurer Joseph Chlebeck Recording Secretary Kathleen Glanzer, or Tape No. to 3. Approval of Minutes Meeting on 1 -9 -85 Corrections: Motion to Approve: by 2nd by Ayes Nays Page 1 AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 4. Anderson / Howe- Rezoning Hearing Scheduled for 7:30. Applicant: Gordon Howe and Edward Anderson. SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Planning Commission Notice of Hearing Mailing List Site Location Planners report pages 1 - 2 page 12 page 13 page 14 pages 19 - 23 Tape no. to Comments Close Hearing: motion by 2nd by ayes Nays Motion to: Approve table deny refer to other A. Rezoning from B -3 to R -2 B. Grant a p.u.d. Conditional Use Permit C. Grant a Variance. pertaing to lot width. Motion by 2nd by ayes nays Motion to approve subdivision: Motion by 2nd by ayes Nays Page 2 AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. Used Car Sales License. Applicant- Rick Rizzo D /B /A R & R Enterprise Location: 3979 Spruce Ryan Industrial Park Hearing scheduled for 7:40 note; this application was made before the Moratorium. Cars are to be located inside bldg. SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of hearing Mailing list Map Copy of Code Copy of zoning code Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Pages 27 and 28 page 29 tape no. to This matter was not referred to the Planning Commission because There is not outdoor storage and the BLdg exist. Objections: Motion to close Hearing: Motion by 2nd by ayes nays Motion to approve table deny refer to other the used auto sales license for Rick Rizzo -D /B /A R & R Enterprise located at 3979 Spruce with the following condition ( or no conditions) motion by 2nd by ayes nays The moratorium On used car sales Note it will take 3 votes to change the Municipal code. It will take four votes and a public hearing. In your opinion is sec 911.040 E -1 - pertains to auto used car auto sales. Page 3 license matter under the or any changes in the zoning code 6 clear enough that it AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6. Used Car Sales License Greg Grady Location- 31 Owasso Blvd. No cars will be on the site. Location is an office. Hearing scheduled for 7: 45 Matter not send to planning commission. See correspondence: Notice of hearing page 30 Mailing list page 31 Location page 32 Planning Commission page 6 Comments Motion to close hearing: motion by Motion to approve table deny used auto sales license for located at 31 Owasso Blvd. with conditions no conditions. motion by 2nd by ayes Tape no. 2nd by ayes nays refer to other Greg Grady page 4 nays to AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7. Ryan Industrial Park - P.U.D. Tape no. to Hearing Scheduled for 8:00 P.M. This is a council initiated action SEE CORRESPONDENCE: Planning Commission Page 8 & 9 Notice of hearing page 33 Planner report page 34 & 35 Map Page 36 Mailing list page 37 & 38 Comments - Close Hearing: Motion by Motion to approve deny 2nd by ayes nays. table refer to other The Ryan Industrial Park as a PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Motion by 2nd by ayes nays 8. Text Amendment Accessory B1dgs. Hearing scheduled for 8:15. SEE CORRESPONDENCE Notice of hearing page 39 Planning Commission report pages 9 - 11 Planner report pages 40 - 41 PROPOSED ORD. ORD 248 pages 42 - 43 Comments: Motion to close hearing: motion by Tape no 2nd by ayes nays introduced ord. no. 248 and ordinance no. 248. Ayes Nays page 5 2nd the adoption of AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED OLD BUSINESS: Tape no. to 9 Brinkman Bottle Club License transfer. Matter tabled 1 -9 -85 Res. no. 85 -1 -18. No word from State. Motion to bring to table motion by 2nd by ayes nays Comments. COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS. 10 Bikeway System Plan. Tape no. to see correspondence page 44 & 45 11 Assessment reapportionment Div. no. 059014 D/P 0068 Aud 1205 See correspondence page 46 Motion to approve assessment reapportionment Motion by 2nd by ayes nays 12 Mn Dot - Signals Little Canada RD. & 35 E. Emergency vehicle pre - emption systems See correspondence page 47. 13 Clarification of Solicitors Copy of ordinance see correspondence pages 48 - 50 Groups that go door to door soliciting funds are they considered solicitors ? page 6 AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA COUNCIL MEETING 1 -23 -85 CONTINUED COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS: 14. Ord. 249- Deleting sec - 809.020 pertaining to Council approval to raise charges for refuse collectors. adoption . Tape no introduced ord 249 and 2nd the Ayes Nays 15. Approval of vouchers Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nays 16. Council Reports: Public Safety Mrs Nardini Utility Mr. Blesener Planning & Zoning Mr. Colova Parks & Recreation Mrs Scalze Administration -- Mr. Fahey. 17. Announcements: For Feb- 27 meeting- The Larry Lee proposal. The budget Auto Matter.Provicied they fill an application. Jim Eddy & Joan Neamy matter provided he fills an application 18. Adjourn: Motion by 2nd by ayes nays Page 7 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA January 10, 1985 Pursuant to due call. and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning.; Commission of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota was hold on the 10th day of January, 1985 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City. Chairman Peter Costa called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. and the following were present at roll call.: MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Costa Bil1 Davison Gene DeLonais Roy French Art HerkenhoEf Karolyn Kingsbury Thomas Perlinger Sharon Timmons MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Ducharme ALSO PRESENT: Steve Grtttman, City Planner Kathleen Glanzer, Recording Secretary Approval There being no corrections to the December 6th Planning Commission Of The minutes, Peter Costa indicated that the minutes were approved as Minutes read. Anderson & Mr. Gordy Howe appeared before the Commission requesting the rezoning Howe of the back 105 feet of the Ed Anderson property fronting on Park Rezoning Street. Mr. Howe reported that he is proposing to build two 4— plexes Proposal on the property. These would be the same units as he built on Ruth Street with a slightly different _front. Mr. Howe stated that he had some concern about Item 6 of the Planner's report which recommends intense landscaping on the South and West property lines. Mr. Howe indicated that the South property line is already screened by some large pine trees. Howe also pointed out that the property on the north is a swamp and he questioned the value of screening from the swamp. Mrs. Timmons questioned what was meant by the word "intense" in the Planner's recommendation. Mr. Crittman replied that since the property would he a PUD and in light of the number of necessary approvals, landscaping should be required to ensure the least amount of impact to the surrounding properties. Crittman stated that iE the trees are adequate screening, then that would he acceptable. Page —1— 1 MINUTIES Planning Commission January 10, 1085 Howe Rezoning Pronosal. (Cont.) Mr. DeLonais stated that he would like to see R -2 or R -3 zoning on the west of Park Street as the east side of Park is R -1. This would provide for a transitional zone in the area. DeLonais stated that the R -2 or R -3 zone should extend about half way between Park Street and Rice. DeLonais stated that he would also like to see the Peterson and Villeaux property rezoned back to R -1 if the City would bear the expense. Mrs. Timmons stated that she thinks the Howe proposal is very acceptable. Timmons stated that this is better than a lot of things that could go in the area under the current 3 -3 zoning and will appease the people on the east side of the street. Mr. French asked if Mr. Howe intended to sell the buildings. Mr. Howe replied that for the present he will keep the buildings, but may sell in the future. French asked if all access would he to Park Street. Mr. Howe replied that it would and the remainder of the Anderson property would access onto Rice Street. Mr. Gowe stated that he is proposing five garages for each building and the extra stall is intended for someone with a boat or extra vehicle. Mr. Herkenhoff asked if multiple dwellings would be acceptable to the neighbors. Mr. DeLonais pointed out that there will be a public hearing on the proposal. DeLonais felt that the neighbors would probably prefer the multiple dwellings to a business. Mr. Costa stated that he did not see the area as a business neighborhood. Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the Gordy Howe Park Avenue development proposal subject to the Planner's report dated January 3, 1985. Motion seconded by Mr. Costa. Motion carried 7 — 1. Mr. French opposing. Mr. French stated that the reason that he is opposed to the proposal is that he does not like the idea of stacking two buildings on the same property. Mr. Howe replied that when going through the final plat, the property will be split. Mr. French. pointed out that there are people with large lots in the City and he objects to having a building in the back. However, French felt that the proposal was better than having a business develop in the area. Page —2— MINUTES Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1935 Jim Eddy Business In Residential Area Mr. Jim Eddy appeared before the Commission to discuss the operation of a towing business from his horne on Vanderbi.o_ and LaBore. Mr. Eddy stated that he was informed to attend the Planning Commission meeting on this subject. Mrs. Timmons stated that this item is not on the agenda and the Planning Commission has no information on it. Mrs. Timmons felt that this matter should he called to the attention of the Mayor, who is the Administrative Council liaison. Timmons pointed out that there are 12 people in the audience wishing to comment on this subject and the Planning Commission does not have this on the agenda, nor knows anything about it. Mr. Costa pointed out that this has happened at the last several Planning Commission meetings. The Commission decided to try to act on this matter even though it had no information as there are so many people present wishing to speak. Mr. Tom Moore of 544 LaBore appeared before the Commission and reported that he has no objection to Mr. Eddy's running a business from his home. Moore stated that he lives across the street from Mr. Eddy and has no problem with the business. Mr. Herb Frantzen of 528 LaBore Road stated that he has no objection to Mr. Eddy's business. Carol Frantzen stated that she, too, did not object to the business. Mrs. Neamy, Mr. Eddy's mother, submitted letters from two neighbors who could not he at the meeting, stating that they did not object to the business. These are from Mrs. Ellen Spears and Mr. Bill Sanders. Mr. Davison asked what would be required by the City in this case. Mr. Crittman stated that Mr. Eddy needs a special home occupation permit. There are some ordinance requirements for parking of vehicles. The main problem would he the exterior storage of vehicles on the site. Mr. Costa asked if there was ever a complaint in the past about Mr. Eddy's operation. It was noted that the City recently received a complaint. Mr. Eddy stated that he was told once before to clean up the area. Mrs. Kingsbury asked about the number of vehicles involved. Mr. Eddy replied that he has two tow trucks and two pick —up trucks. He also has one car. Mr. Eddy stated that he just tows vehicles he does not do repairs on the site. Mr. Eddy stated that he does sometimes tow vehicles to the site, but usually has removed them in a couple days. Mrs. Neamy pointed out that there are a great many people in Little Canada running businesses from their homes. Neamy asked why the City is not dealing with these people also. Page —3— MINUTES Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1085 Jim Eddy (Cont.) Mr. Costa replied that the City usually deals with these things on a complaint: basis. Mr. Crittman asked Mr. Eddy if he has filled out an application for a home occupation permit. Mr. Eddy replied that he has not. Mrs. Kingsbury informed the audience that not all the neighbors are in favor of the business as the City has received a complaint. Kingsbury also noted that the person complaining probably does not know the matter is being discussed as it is not on the agenda. Mrs. Timmons stated that Mr. Eddy has to fill out an application for a permit and suggested that the matter he referred to the Council without any action. Mr. DeLonai.s felt that Mr. Eddy's business should be required to comply with all provisions of the home occupation ordinance. Mr. Grittman stated that under the ordinance one tow truck would he acceptable, but two would be in violation of the ordinance. Mr. Costa asked how many wrecked cars are on the premises at one time. Mr. Eddy replied that the scrap yards are not open on the weekends. Mrs. Timmons asked if the Building Inspector gave Mr. Eddy a copy of the procedure to follow for a home occupation permit. Mr. Eddy replied that he did. Mrs. Timmons did not feel that the Commission could decide this matter until it had all the facts before it. Timmons pointed out that there may be other neighbors in the area not happy with this situation. Miss Frantzen asked why Mr. Eddy should lose his business because one person complained about it. Mrs. Timmons pointed out that the area is a residential one and the person who complained has the right to keep the area residential. Mrs. Timmons stated that the Commission is probably not hearing both sides of the issue tonight. Mr. Herkenhoff stated that he felt if the City singled Mr. Eddy out, it would be causing a lot of problems with the other home occupations in the City. Mrs. Timmons pointed out that there are other home occupations in the City that the City has denied and people have had to relocate their businesses. Mr. DeLonais stated that this business has gone beyond the limits or a little business. DeLonais stated that three or four trucks is not a little business. Page —4— 1 MINUTES Planning Commission ( Jan. 10, 1935 Jim Eddy (Cont.) Mrs. Timmons felt that the Commission needed more information before it could act. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that home occupi_ionpermi.t for Mr. Jim Eddy be approved in light of the fact that the neighbors have indicated that the business is not a problem and that the business meets the provisions of the ordinance covering home occupations. Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. Ayes (3) Perlinger, Herkenhoff., French. Nayes (5) DeLonais, Costa, Kingsbury, Timmons, Davison. Motion denied. Mr. Costa recommended that Mr. Eddy scale down his operation before bringing the matter to the Council. Costa felt that the permit might get approved if there were only one tow truck involved. Costa informed Mr. Eddy that his operation is too big for the property and at times the area has looked pretty rough. Miss Frantzen asked why Mr. Eddy should pay property taxes if he cannot operate his business. Mr. Costa pointed out that Mr. Eddy is paying residential property taxes and that people in the area have a right to protect their homes. Mr. Frantzen asked if the City would approve the permit if Mr. Eddy parked some of his trucks at his home. Mrs. Timmons stated that she did not feel that the City would allow Mr. Eddy to spread his business throughout the neighborhood. Mr. Herkenhoff asked how many cars a homeowner could have on a property. Mr. Grittman replied that as long as the vehicles are licensed, and parked in the garage or driveway, a homeowner could have as many as they wanted. Mr. Frantzen pointed out that the City rented property in the neighbor- hood in the past for City vehicles. Mr. Costa stated that the City now has a new ordinance since that time. Mr. Costa stated that four trucks and wrecked vehicles sometimes turned upside down are very unsitely. Costa stated that the operation is too big for a residential area. Mrs. Timmons suggested that Mr. Eddy meet with the Planner and he could tell him what the ordinance requires. Timmons felt that the Commission should have a Planner's report on this matter and a public hearing should be held. Then, everyone in the neighborhood will be notified. Timmons informed the audience that even if the neighborhood is in favor, the Council could still deny the permit. Page -5- MINUTES Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1985 Jim Eddy (Cont.) Greg Grady Used Car Lot License Budget Auto Mr. Davison stated that the City has set procedures that should be followed and they were not in this case. Davison stated that he did not want to act on this proposal when the process has been circumvented. Mr. DeLonais recommended tabling of the Jim Eddy home occupation permit. Motion seconded by Mrs. Kingsbury. Motion carried 8 — 0. Mr. Greg Grady of 31 Owasso Blvd., which is located across from Buck Blacktop, appeared before the Commission requesting- approval of a used car lot license. Mr. DeLonais pointed out that this is not on the agenda and the Commission has no information on it. Mr. Grady reported that he is scheduled for a public hearing on this for January 23 and he was told to appear at the Planning Commission meeting on January 10. The Planner stated that he has seen a couple of items in this office on this, but no report was ordered. Mr. Grady reported that he basically wholesales cars and needs a license for two or three cars on the property. Grady reported that he already has his permit from the State and that the Building Inspector informed him that the public hearing would he a formality. Mr. Grady is already operating his business. Mr. Grittrnan asked if Mr. Grady has seen anyone in the office. Mr. Grady replied that he was in the office about two or three weeks ago on the matter. Mr. DeLonais did not feel that the Commission could act on this matter with no information. Mr. DeLonais suggested that the matter be tabled. Mr. Grady stated that he had no problem with this as he is operating and does have his permit from the State. Mr. Richard Fritz of Budget Auto appeared before the Commission. Mr. Fritz reported that the original used car lot on Rice and County Road C was approved for 15 cars on the lot. When he came to the City in March of 1983 he submitted basically the same proposal as the first lot with the exception that 30 cars be approved. Page —6— MINUPFS Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1985 Budget Auto Mr. Fritz stated that he thought he had a license for 30 cars. Mr. DeLonais stated that he was on the Commission in 1976 and there was never to be any parking in the southwest corner of the property. Mr. Fritz stated that he was not aware of it, but is complying with that now. Mrs. Timmons asked the number of cars stated on the Budget Auto license. Mr. Fritz replied that his license does not say how many cars he can have. Fritz stated that if he had known that he could only have 15 cars, he would have never opened up. Mrs. Timmons stated that she thinks the lot looks junky. There are too many cars and they are not placed nicely. Timmons felt that 30 cars was too many. Mr. Costa asked if there were plans for upgrading the parking areas. Fritz replied that he planned to lime rock the parking areas and leave the grassy area in the Eront. Mrs. Timmons stated that there were to he no banners or flags on the lot. Fritz replied that he has never had banners or flags. Fritz also stated that most of the time he does not have 30 cars, but between 15 and 20. Fritz pointed out that he has been in business for almost two years and this is the first he has heard of any complaints that he has had too many cars. Fritz stated that he cannot stay in business with a 15 car limitation. Fritz stated that he needs a variety of merchandize to attract people. Mrs. Timmons stated that a spot that would hold 30 cars would probably be more expensive to run than the present location. Fritz replied that this was not true. Timmons stated that the City wants the business run by the Code. Fritz replied that he can live with the City Codes, but not the 15 car limitation. Mr. Vince Scarella, a co —owner of the business, stated that when they came in to the City for a license, their proposal said 30 cars, but apparently no one read the proposal. The business has been in operation a couple of years and there have been no complaints until a couple of months ago. Mr. Costa asked if there was room for 30 cars. The Planner suggested that Mr. Fritz bring him a site plan of how the cars will be displayed and also designate customer parking area. Gri.ttman stated that he could work on this during staff hours. Mrs. Timmons stated that she would like to see a Planner's report on this. Page —7— i INlrf':S Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1935 Budget Auto (Cont.) Election Of Officers Mr. DeLonais stated that he would like to see the conditions apply to Budget Auto as did in 1976 unless the City feels that some concessions can he made. Mrs. Timmons recommended that the Budget Auto matter be tabled until the Commission has received a Planner's Report. Motion seconded by Mr. Davison. Motion carried 8 — 0. Mrs. Timmons recommended t hat Mr. Peter Costa be elected as Chairman of the Planning Commission and Mr. Gene DeLonais he elected as Vice Chairman. Motion seconded by Mrs. Kingsbury. Motion carried 8 — 0. Ryan Mrs. Timmons stated that the idea of a PUD for Ryan Industrial was Industrial a good one. The PUD would apply to development that was in place Park PUD before January 1, 1985. Also, the PUD will allow the city flexibility in the park. Mr. Grittman stated that the PUD will allow the City and property owners in the park to negotiate. Also, the City will not have to go through the variance process to handle all the non — conformities in the park. The Planner reported that Art Ryan also thinks this is an excellent way to handle the situation. Mrs. Timmons asked how this will effect the outdoor storage issue. Grittman replied that with a PUD everything in the park comes under scrutiny. Mr. Davison commented that this is a way of granting variances in the park without setting precedents. Mr. Aerkenhoff asked if the businesses in the park are in favor of this proposal. Mr. Grittman replied that everyone seems to think that it is a workable idea. Mrs. Timmons asked how the City can rezone all this property. The Planner replied that the City would hold a public hearing on the proposal and the property owners would be notified. Grittman stated that the proposal is a way to gain more control for the City and flexibility in return for allowing variances. Page —3— MINUTES Planning, Commission Jan. 10, 1935 1 Ryan PUD Mr. DeLonais recommended adoption of the Ryan industrial Park PI11) proposal. Motion seconded by Mrs. Timmons. Motion carried 3 — 0. Text The Planner presented for approval a text amendment: which eliminates Amendment the word "garage" in reference to accessory buildings. Mr. Grittman Accessory explained that the ordinance referred to both garages and accessory Buildings buildings and this was confusing. The amendment simply cleans up the language so that the ordinance is consistent. The Planner stated that garages are accessory buildings. • Mrs. Kingsbury pointed out that a portion of the ordinance was eliminated which referred to a five foot setback from the lot lines. The Planner stated that the intent may have been to make all accessory buildings subject to setback. The Planner stated that he would check this out. At this point in the meeting, Mr. DeLonais asked to be excused. The Planner reported that the text amendment says that not more than one accessory building per single family dwelling is allowed. There was confusion before in the ordinance as it referred to garages and accessory buildings. The Planner stated that the ordinance does not govern sheds that are less than 120 square feet, however. Also, if more than one accessory building is desired, a conditional use permit would have to he granted. Mrs. Timmons pointed out that the text amendment is just a clarification of the wording of the ordinance. Some members on the Commission expressed concern that under this ordinance only one accessory building is allowed per single Family home. Mrs. Timmons recommended approval of the text amendment regarding accessory buildings. Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. Motion denied 3 — 4. Ayes (3) Timmons, Perl.inger, Kingsbury. Nayes (4) Costa, Davison, French, Herkenhoff. Mrs. Timmons pointed out that those voting against were opposed to the existing ordinance. Timmons stated that her motion was not changing the ordinance that already existed, but merely clarifying it Page —9— MLVIPC!S Planning Commission Jan. 10, 1985 Accessory Buildings (Cont.) Mr. Costa stated that there are a lot of large logs in the City and felt that one accessory building was not practical for some of these large lots. The Planner pointed out that an accessory building can be up to 1,000 square feet in size. Mr. French stated that he objected to the 15 foot height restriction in the ordinance. Timmons pointed out that these are concerns about the original ordinance and the text amendment was just a clarification of the ordinance that is already in effect. Timmons stated that the Building Inspector has requested this clarification. Timmons stated that she does not remember this ordinance causing a problem and she was not in favor of spending tax money to rewrite an ordinance until there is a problem with it. Mr. Costa stated that there has not been a problem, because people build accessory buildings without a building permit. Mr. Herkenhoff suggested that without the text amendment, the code could he interpreted with more flexibility and may not be as restrictive. Mrs. Timmons stated that the Building Inspector does not want this flexibility as it causes problems. Timmons felt that it would be to the benefit of the City not to have a flexible ordinance as the Council and Commission are legally responsible for interpretations of ordinances. Timmons stated that it was very important to the City to have clear —cut ordinances. Timmons stated that whether or not the Commission agrees with the ordinance, it should he a clear —cut ordinance. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that the proposed text amendment on accessory buildings be reconsidered. Motion seconded by Mr. Davison. Motion carried 7 — 0. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that the proposed text amendment on accessory buildings he approved. Motion seconded by Mr. French. Motion carried 7 — 0. Mr. Davison stated that a lot of people in the City knowingly or unknowingly assume that they can put up sheds. Mr. French stated that the height limitation in the ordinance still bothered him. —10— MINUTES Planning; Commission Jan. 10, 1935 Adjourn Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that the meeting be adjourned. Motion seconded by Mr. French. Motion carried 7 — 0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:44 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kathleen Glanzer Recording Secretary Page —11— Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA NOTICE OF PUE3LIC HEARING ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of January, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City to consider the following: PROPOSAL: Zoning District Amendment Rezone from B -3 (General Business District) to R -2 (Medium Density District) LOCATION: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development and Construction of two 4- piexes with detached garages. Variance Lot width - permit 105 feet lot width (Code requires 125 feet lot width) Subdivision Subdivide lot 9 block 2 North Park Addition Property I.D. 53- 55200- 091 -02 2550 Rice Street North Park Subj to Hwy; the S 2/5 of Lot 9 Blk 2 APPLICANT: Gordie Howe All persons desiring to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard during this hearing. " -12 oseph G. Chiebeck - Clerk MAYOR Raymond Hanson COUNCIL Michael Fahey Beverly Scalze Dennis Forsberg Mugs Nardini Ralph Jr. & Marguerite Nardini 405 County Road E W St. Paul, MN 55112 53- 76000 - 040 -01 Thomas Duray 2.504 Rice Street N. St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 76000- 011 -01 Flameburger 2534 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 76000- 012 -01 Seven- Eleven 2526 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 76000- 020 -01 James Veilieux et al 57 W. Demont St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55200- 101 -02 Hazel Peterson et al 65 W. Demont Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55200- 102 -02 Joseph Jr. & Joanne Saiko 20 Demont Ave W St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 13000 - 301 -01 Daniel & Valerie Byrne 78 Demont Ave W St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 13800- 191 -01 Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park Inc 2442 N. Rice Street Office Box 77 St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 13800 - 242 -01 Joseph F. Saiko et al 30 Dement Ave W. St. Paul, MN 55117 53-13000-271-01 ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE Little C Inc. 1086 Sherren W St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 75000- 302 -02 Warren B. Fritze Jr. & Betty J. Fritze 2573 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 051 -09 Gerald J. Erickson 2573 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 051 -09 Harry N. Ray 10240 Chicago Circle Mpls., MN 55420 53- 55000- 060 -09 Laurence J. Saiko et al 33 W. Demont Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 351 -09 Gary & Ginger Decker 2553 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 421 -09 C R Mc Kee Jr. et al 2555 Spruce Street N. St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 451 -09 Donald & Carol S Behr 2557 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000 - 481 -09 Donald L. Empson et al 899 Grand Ave St. Paul, MN 55105 53- 55000- 201 -09 Russell Johnson et al 45 W Demont Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 290 -09 13 3 Christ A Behm et al 2587 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 55000- 340 -05 Helen Malaske 2558 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 55000- 231 -07 Edward Anderson and Patricia Anderson 2550 Rice Street N. St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 55200- 091 -02 ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE ROSEVILLE MAILING LIST HEARING ON JAN. 23, 1985 Dorothy F. Lashomb 2587 N. Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 79- 01200- 150 -01 Vernon W. Thompson et al 2571 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55117 79- 01200 - 010 -11 City of Roseville 2660 Civic Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55113 79- 01200- 050 -11 Marvin A Warner & Phyllis A Arbuckle 2353 Rice Street N. St. Paul, MN 55113 79- 01200- 100 -11 George A. Forsblad 167 Wewers Road St. Paul, MN 55113 E. Caves & Sons Inc. 2301 Woodbridge Street St. Paul, MN 55113 _Jl 1 1 • 1 • 2 • LAKE ST T t.1 I j 716c. — l• ;.. .1. IT •I t .-i- i. I -7- 3 ' 5 .... ? d 256.. ;30 •I Le•-:!...c.__?:.T., • ' ;-• I ,.. ' VI \t". : • e c_. _....,1 5 2 yr-. 1 .7....-{ I i 0.18 44- • a • bl 4. J 02.1 . - — •■r+ i 1- 4 -; • - V4 I pi • D E 0 N - • • A V E- — - 14 northwest associated consultEnts, Inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission FROM: David Licht DATE: 3 January 1985 RE: Gordie Howe - Park Avenue Development Proposal FILE NO: 758.09 - 84.55 BACKGROUND Mr. Howe is proposing to develop a small parcel of land west of Park Avenue. The parcel which is to be separated from a tract of land which runs between Park Avenue and Rice Street is presently zoned B -3 and is located just north of the two single family properties at Park and Demont which were rezoned to R -B this summer. The development proposed is two four unit buildings on two separate parcels of land. The buildings, except for the proposed colonial design are to be similar to Mr. Howe's prior project on Ruth Street. Due to the location and proposed site arrangement, a number of approvals are necessary. These are: 1. Rezoning from B -3 to R -2. 2. Subdivision of the two parcels. 3. Variance to lot width - 125 feet required, 105 feet available. 4. Conditional use permit for multiple fancily dwelling within the R -2 District. 5. Conditional use permit - planned unit development for separate parcel lacking direct public street frontage and utilizing shared access. REQUEST ANALYSIS Rezoning. The most significant issue posed by the suggested development is the re- zoning from B -3 to R -2. Over the last summer, the area in which the site in question is located generated major discussion as it related to the development of a car wash and parking lot. The resolution of this matter was the rezoning of the two single family properties at Park and Demont to R -B, the zoning of the parcel west of the single family lots to PUD and the next westerly lot to B -3. 15 4820 nlinnetonk* blvd. minne polls, minnesoto, ste. 120 H7116 tel 61 2/92', -9120 Little Canada Mayor and City Council . Little Canada Planning Commission 3 January 1985 Page Two The parcel in question is part of.Planning District 18 and borders directly on District 19. The area, both as part of the Comprehensive Plan and the discussions which took place during the summer of 1984, is one in which questions exist as to the most appropriate land use. The decision to rezone the single family residences to R -B was partly a hedge in use determination, but also clearly established a transi- tional land use pattern from high intensity commercial on the west bordering Rice Street to lower intensity residential east of Park Avenue. The Howe request is viewed as an extension of the transitional land use concept. The medium density housing with its proposed north /south orientation can buffer itself from commercial uses to the west. Compatibility with low density residential east of Park Avenue is also seen to exist on the same basis, while simultaneously minimizing traffic, general activity and the like. As a consequence, the request as proposed is viewed positively from a rezoning perspective. Conditional Use Permit - Multiple Dwelling. An evaluation of this aspect of the development request must be weighed on the same criteria as noted in the preceding section. Land use wise, the proposal is seen as an acceptable transitional activity which can exist harmoniously with existing and potential surrounding development. Subdivision. To accomplish the proposed development, the land in question must be divided from the present site which runs through the block from Park Avenue to Rice Street. Such a split is seen as necessary and is readily endorsed except for its failure to meet minimum lot width requirements. This consideration will be reviewed further in the section below entitled "Variance ". A subdivision of the base parcel is also being requested. The request proposes to situate each structure and its parking on separate lots. This concept is also viewed as acceptable. However, to accomplish this end, a planned unit development - con- ditional use permit must be approved as the westerly lot shares access with the easterly parcel and has no public frontage. Again, this matter is discussed further below. Beyond the considerations raised above, it is suggested that the lots be required to have five foot drainage and utility easements placed along all property lines, a park dedication requirement be imposed, and utility construction and drainage be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. At minimum, however, is that each structure have its own separate utility service. It is also assumed that the land transfer will be prepared as a final plat and processed accordingly. Variance - Lot Width. Under the present B -3 zoning district, a minimum lot width of 100 feet is required. The parcel in question is 105 feet. In changing the zoning, however, to R -2, a 125 foot lot width is required. In this regard, the applicant has attempted to secure additional land, but has been rejected by neighboring owners. In view of the fact that the initial land division was in excess of the B -3 district and was likely in response to the resulting standards, the change in proposed use should not be hampered by the site design standard. Therefore, on the basis that the lot was previously approved and the standard lot standards changed with public action or rezoning, it is felt that the 20 foot lot variance is justified. 16 Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission 3 January 1985 Page Three Planned Unit Development. The clustering of the two proposed structures is seen as acceptable from a site layout perspective. This positioning and the division of the property, however, requires approval of a conditional use permit - planned unit development. This is seen as accetpable provided driveway and utility easements are properly prepared and a property owners association is established for maintenance, repair and other such factors of joint utilization. Site Design Evaluation. The site and building plans, as proposed, are attached to this report. These are reflective of the proposal with the exception that the garages will be five stall structures instead of four bay buildings., This situation will result in five foot setbacks from the internal lot line. Such situations are acceptable from a planned unit development zoning perspective and also building code requirements. It has been recommended to the applicant that intense landscaping improvements be added at minimum to the south and west portion of the site. Similar treatment would also appear desirable to the north. To the east some site enhancement would also assist in the accomplishment of the transition concept. All other aspects of the site layout have been found to conform to the City's zoning requirements. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the five requests involved in the proposed development are recommended contingent upon: 1. The subdivision is prepared in final plat form and processed accordingly. 2. Utility and drainage easements be placed along all lot lines. 3. Park dedication fees be paid. 4. Utility and drainage plans be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. A development contract, as well as property owners association agreement be prepared to govern driveway and utility maintenanceand repair, plus any other jointly utilized facilities. The agreements in question should be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. 6. Intense landscaped natural screening be required along the south and west lot lines of the property. Landscape enhancements are also to be made along the north and east portions of the sites. Plans for these improvements detailing number, species and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. A performance bond as specified by the Zoning Ordinance shall be required for these improvements prior to the issuance of building permits and said improvements are to be installed prior to the issuance of building occupancy permits. 17 Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission 3 January 1985 Page Four 7. Any other recommendations as may be suggested by the City Building Official, City Attorney, City Engineer or City Clerk. cc: Joseph Chlebeck Lowell Nagovsky Don Carley Tom Sweeney Gordie Howe City Park Commission 18 Sketch Map: 679foi'e go we PARK •c›- r . I •))i)(2 ,v 45:3,0 +15 (1.47-7i,r,2,7 2tei/7/1/2(7 /IN r A 1 \I The Ea st .9/0 feet of the S-.nLb 215 1,1 Lot 1,c1: Ramsey County, nn e Scale: ri z 50' P.)ok Page I hereby certif,, prepared by a shot I am a di lows of Ihe Job No y 19 'EXHIBIT "B" 1•-■ r, , 11 Ann r W 0 co G- 1 0 C j Z 3 Iil I �III�Ii��i: I I I i I I i EXHIBIT "C" • 4, -21 iJ )Tin ,CO T • co) ig .111. '7. . .7/ 'DS ili/0115 — EXHIBIT "D" G• fi • 1' 5 6 Z '7 • 9 C. • ZI TV". a A ••••-•.1 Loa r - 0 - 1 51 • 1,, 7.4—,-:•-zi —. •,./i.z 1) 1 _.1, e.--2-1-- • r IP 01! 1k94. it It 12i 11 11 4 9 T1 t OP0-1 '-',1.34:” X EXHIBIT "E" 22 G•?.1 --• --r z 0- o- a —g , -1 ,• a ,- i g ,•:, .-} 4 k ' cky .„; • j < , ' ':-• ! 0 ! 0; 1 , \ - I / 12. _ IN N 7 — — , 71 ; 7 , -I L 1-; ••••.f.; L _ a- • 23 :1•• ,• ., , , • ; , , '1, 13 . .. ... ,,' ,,,, , • i., ,, , • .. „, : ,,, ,,,i, , • i,.., , , 1 , CT j; : • ' ; ; ;21 •; . j : ,_ • i LT:. ,,.;•.! Hy. r- • H C) a 0 r; a 3 EXHIBIT "F: Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT USED AUTOMOBILE SALES Notice is hereby giver, that the Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of January,1985 at 7:40 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at,515 Little Canada Road in said City to consider the following. PROPOSAL: LOCATION: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Grant a Conditional Use Permit for a license to sell used automobiles 3979 Spruce. Ryan Industrial Park Part in School Dist. 624 Part in School Dist 623 Lot -1- Blk -2- APPLICANT: Rick Rizzo D /B /A -R & R Enterprise. All persons desering to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard during this hearing. • /r-71� Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk - Treasurer 24 MAYOR Raymond Hanson COUNCIL Michael Fahey Beverly Scalze Dennis Forsberg Mugs Nardinl CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT USED AUTOMOBILE SALES RICK RIZZO DBA R & R ENTERPRISE HEARING ON JANUARY 23, 1985 City of St. Paul 216 City Hall St. Paul, MN 55102 53- 03110 - 010 -52 R & S Automotive 38 Woodlyn Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 00600 - 150 -38 Fuel Economy 95 W. Woodlyn P. O. Box 43336 St. Paul, MN 55164 53- 00600 - 070 -38 Knox Lumber Company 801 Transfer Road Box 43679 St. Paul, MN 55164 53- 03110 - 130 -79 McKesson & Robbins 3230 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 61000- 030 -01 A J Ryan Landscape Supply Co Inc 3176 Ryan Lane St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 010 -05 ' V & L Larson & S J Wiegele 3172 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 030 -03 William Schifsky 3175 Ryan Lane St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000- 041 -03 Vern & Laverne Larson 3172 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000- 042 -03 Rick Rizzo 3979 Spruce St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 011 -02 Richard Jacobsen 3173 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 020 -02 „,>:).-eci .s.----.--,),,,,,:ct , Ah:Act,--: : I t ; \ i LIL.! h"I'tl•CR2i1;1' Y.; : cr • 4 ; ! I sj,>. •,•• tt:t „ r ,.., ; ; Ift ; 1 ; i I: ic•f,/ = x _ : THIRO t,„/ --- 1 S 7: Vjti: 1- A? t ; t.'-7, .' .-T'- ±•Cr .-. -.i-,..‘f i*<I; -t ±, .. _ O •-'7.- -,,I tt t.,: 171.1t.y!: i. ._ .fr.--4 r! L.,; . .. 3 . ,;I ; ' .., ! I 2, .. . 1..: t1t-• ,I.•:: -l! ; "ri 4--,-:ui4 4 :i ' .'' •.-•. • . .. t . 1? r:p ; 1 l Z !! c \ .1: ".. 1 . A -.t S T. 1 / E..,;.1,1,4.11..i i 4_ 1 2•314 i - 1 1 r, 1.-;_L . I SCCOND • , • I • I • • Vt, 111111;!.• L ! 17J •;;•••12210't1it,%•,..0!..• tt• • ‘' C•y cl RAYS w It'•‘CCItt A . E ttrt L • !S••• -s1;:- 171,!re -174, .. — _ ....,_ _.......... t ... L...,...,L. 4 10... 1s14 , .. 1.: 1...4 •"•■• 4-4 3 .0.200.4. • CT 3 4.00 30 4. "1 ; . t!• .Y7 • • •!! .... nn. _..,..__,....- -- — ___..-•_::_t:-.!..:.:, .. • - • •• ------ !, , —"". ---• A-t: - ... ' -•,. A...1_1.. n 1 -----,..H;7,-57--, •- .3,$) i E 2 pAP,K tt: t• „A. -4 "e—j—OrTIVE t . 1 • % __ ____________. ---.4-•1. '--:::".._ - 1 1 • _',. •-.---------7-,—_______—___ Q-7_7,4 H...2.0...0-)at .. I --t•—r- - -,-7...--- ,T; 0 0'71.1' i . In / 1 .. ... II. ..? . . ...: )1 P ' . . T -7:7: -.- '-•.:1C-7---7- -.2-2..71f..71. .., i :.. ...4 pi ,, A' n 1 11.0 i••■• A 31 • • (/1 tA t: ! 1 04e 7 )•tc,. ■0/ / t ,14, ic •,. : . . 1 1 : 4 A I •S(0 L A K / i'• .4----c- le•• 9 0, Pr, "L. •••••• C-r1;3 1 z _ Atitt—Ztat ;IL_ .4 "ri14-.-iliL%—m—r-.•.3 0 N O R T 1-4"• Int .: r -1...3: 2____::... \Cei,o) _nut/LA:n-3' l_j1:7-2 A 1::: Pli • 11-“r ri •1; I C•5. ...• V — 10 4 ,, • -‘ V• 1 NS‘l is na•—,„ .. ' 1:1 „a 4110 4 .... \ 3 •\1”" ‘ en I \A • • IS 1„ a e! v (t) 4- — — .... LLL.. • • , 1 a _ • • • - ..... 4 ...... 802.030. DEPOSIT FEE. At the time of filing an application for a license to engage in the business of selling cigarettes at retail, the applicant shall deposit with the City Clerk the sum of Twelve Dollars ($12.00) and the Clerk shall thereupon deliver to the applicant a receipt therefor containing a statement of the purpose for which the deposit was made and a copy of said receipt shall be attached to and filed with the application. 802.040. INSPECTION. Any applicant shall permit the officers of the City to inspect and examine the place of business described in the application and any refusal on the part of the applicant to permit such inspection shall be sufficient ground for the Council to refuse the license applied for. 802.050. LICENSE GRANTED BY RESOLUTION. The Council shall, after whatever investigation it deems necessary, by resolution grant the license applied for by such applicant, if in the opinion of the Council he is entitled thereto. 802.060. ANNUAL LICENSE YEAR AND FEE. The annual cigarette license as provided for herein shall run for the period of one (1) calendar year commencing January 1st of each year. If application is made after January 1st, the licensee shall pay a fee on the basis of One Dollar ($1.00) for each month or portion of month of the calendar year remaining and such fee shall entitle the applicant to engage in the business of selling cigarettes for the remainder of the year unless for any reason the license is revoked or suspended. (Source: Ord. 3) 803. USED CAR SALES 803.010. LICENSE. No person shall engage in the business of selling, buying, trading or dealing in used automobiles or motor vehicles of any kind within the City without first procuring a license to engage in such business as hereinafter provided. This license requirement shall apply from and after the date of the passage of this ordinance and every person engaged in such business at this time must obtain a license hereunder in order to continue the operation of such business. 803.020. APPLICATION, FEE AND LICENSE PERIOD. Application for used car dealers licenses shall be made to the Clerk of the City on a form to be furnished by the Clerk. The fee for such license shall be Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) per year and the license period shall be the calendar year. The license fee for any part of a year shall be the same as for a full year. All applications to engage in used car business must be submitted by the Clerk to the City Council at its next regular meeting before such license may be issued. 27 3 803.030. OPERATION LOCATION. The applicant shall specify in what location he desires to operate. He shall include in the application both the street address and the legal description of the property. The license when issued, shall be limited to the area described. No license shall be issued unless the property upon which the business is to be conducted is zoned Commercial. The Council may in its discretion permit the use of a used car license on property located in a light industrial zone. The Council in arranging for the approval of the application, shall set up such restrictions as to manner of operation, location of vehicles, limitation of number of vehicles, protection, fencing or screening of the grounds devoted to the use and any other provisions or requirements that may be deemed advisable by the Council in order to preserve the best appearance and to prevent complaints from neighboring property owners. 803.040. RESPONSIBILITY OF OPERATION. Any licensee hereunder shall be held responsible for nuisances emanating from his operating and he shall not permit debris, wreckage, automobile parts, dismantled motor vehicles, or any other kinds of waste or debris from his business to he deposited on any public or private property or on his own property. Licensee shall provide parking area within the confines of his private property to accommodate the motor vehicles of customers so that parking in the area of his place of business will not constitute a traffic hazard or a neighborhood nuisance. 803.050. NOTICE OF REVOCATION. The Council may upon ten (10) days written notice, require the licensee to show cause as to why his license should not be revoked if he fails to live up to the provisions of this Chapter or to any special provisions required by the Council at the time of the issuance of the license. Upon failure to show cause the licensee's rights may be terminated by the Council. (Source: Ord. 45) 804. SOLICITORS. 804.010. TERM. A solicitor, for the purpose of this Chapter, shall be defined to be any person who goes from house to house, or from place to place, in the City, selling or taking orders for, or offering to sell or take orders for, goods, wares or merchandise or any articles for future delivery, or for services to be performed in the future, or for making, manufacturing or repairing of any article or thing whatsoever for future delivery; provided, however, that this Chapter shall apply only to solicitors who demand, accept or receive payment or deposit of money in advance of final delivery. 28 5. Does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Ordinance. 6. The provisions of Section 921,010, C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Open or outdoor service, sale and rental as a principal or accessory use provided that: Outside services, sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use. 2. Outside soles areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting "R" District in compliance with Section 903.020, G of this Ordinance. 3. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right -of -way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 903.020, I of this Ordinance. 4. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. 5. The use does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Ordinance. 6. The provisions of Section 921.010,C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. F. Accessory, enclosed retail, rental or service activity other than that allowed as a permitted use or conditional use within this Section, provided that: 1„ Such use is allowed as a permitted use in a "B-1", 2. Such use does not constitute more than thirty (30) percent of the lot area and not more than fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of the principal use, 3. Adequate off - street parking and off - street loading in compliance with the requirements of Sections 903.050 and 903.060 of this Ordinance is provided. 4. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 903.110 of this Ordinance. 5. The provisions of Section 921.010,C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. G. Commercial planned unit development as regulated by Section 923 of this Ordinance. 911 .050. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a "B -2" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Ordinance. A. Lot Area: B. Lot Width: C. Setbacks: 15,000 square feet 100 feet 1. Front Yards: Not less than forty (40) feet. 2. Side Yards: a. Abutting residential property or public right -of -way 40 feet b. Abutting non - residential property None 3. Rear Yards: Not less than twenty (20) feet. 911.060. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. A, Height. No structure shall exceed three (3) stories or thirty -six (36) feet, whichever is least, except as herein provided. 62 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT USED AUTOMOBILE SALES Notice is hereby given that the Council ofithe City of Little Canada, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of January, 1985 at 7:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City to consider the following: PROPOSAL: Grant a Conditional Use Permit for a license to sell used automobiles. LOCATION: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 31 Owasso Blvd. Unplatted lands W 105 ft. of E 260 ft. of S 232 5/10 ft. of NW ; of NW / (Subj to Blvd) in Sec 6 Twn 29 R 22 APPLICANT: Greg Grady All persons desiring to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard during this hearing. Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk /Treasurer -30 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT USED AUTOMOBILE SALES HEARING ON JAN, 23, 1985 GREG GRADY MID -WEST SPRING MFG CO 100 SO OWASSO BLVD ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600- 040 -42 FRANK J TROBEC ET AL 2968 RICE ST ST PAUL MN 55113 53- 00600 - 060 -42 CHARLES H WEBER 2962 RICE ST ST PAUL MN 55113 53- 00600- 070 -42 LLOYD H BELLIN 32 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 080 -42 GEORGE KURKOSKI 34 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 080 -42 RAYMOND E FILLER ET AL 30 S OWASSO BLVD ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 090 -42 CLARENCE M & FLORENCE M DEER 419 IIIGHWAY 36 W ST PAUL MN 55113 53- 00600- 130 -38 HOWARD R LEE ET AL 31 S OWASSO BLVD ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 050 -39 JOAN B HOLMBERG 49 OWASSO BLVD SO ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 060 -39 JOAN I3 MC ELMURY 49 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 060 -39 -- 31 DEALERS FINANCE CORP 75 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600- 090 -38 DONOVAN CONSTR CO 1080 MONTREAL AVE ST PAUL MN 55102 53- 00600 - 110 -38 DONOVAN CONSTR CO 53 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 110 -38 MPLS STP SAULT ST MARIE RY 1ST.NATL S00 LINE BLDG MPLS MN 55402 53- 00600 - 010 -36 STONERIDGE ASSOCIATES 2345 RICE ST N ST PAUL MN 55113 53- 00600 - 250 -30 RONALD & NORMA MARIANA 24 S OWASSO BLVD ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 270 -30 GARY ANDERT 671 MAGNOLIA AVE E ST PAUL, MN 55106 53- 00600- 190 -30- ROSE GERVAIS 5 OWASSO BLVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 020 -29 WILLIAM GERVAIS 1335 ROSE PLACE ST PAUL MN 55113 53- 00600 - 030 -29 ALLEN I KNACK ET AL 20 OWASSO I3LVD S ST PAUL MN 55117 53- 00600 - 130 -30 (n1 -A ' \ „ 42ne“-i \ \2) \ \ Id rc • , s r . • J. N OWASSO 4.0 Z7115 CT—. ric7). I,c4c. (I) _(4.(145.1 tit ,.(>4 •C • 1.1 t'0 • Cfr 2 .9 (7) 941_ A Yar2s.a ° T110) "PO - 9. ('5) Z cia \ (IC)) -urn • 14 I. \in\ zn,T-17 (8) (V et On1 13 \ .±1t4 TY.3 figra7 / 84 ac OCk ". ti1(4) (7) .n.i.4--1.58•77 ,-,1'1•7--7 6 •SAS (T,Y. 370-.1-Y-a) 011 :C. n 98 an CCP n8ne... (2) (3) fr.):;;■ () it. 8.1 > ,:. (3) ' (?,) M r?) \ (8) (ItZ ; ' ■•• •.L11111Yria tL 11.1 z I ty, • CITY OF LITTLE CANADA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of January, 1985 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City to consider the following: PROPOSAL: To make the Ryan Industrial Park Area into a "Planned Unit Development District ". LOCATION: Ryan Industrial Park Ryan Drive from Country Drive to Spruce Street. Ryan Lane from Spruce Street to Ryan Drive. Spruce Street from Ryan Drive to the south end of lot 6 blk 2 and lot 1 blk 4 of Ryan Industrial Park. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Ryan Industrial Park Blk 1 Lots 1 -3 and Outlot A Blk 2 Lots 1 -6 except Outlot B & C: Blk 3 Lots 1 -5 Blk 4 Lots 1 -9 APPLICANT: Little Canada City Council All persons desiring to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard during this hearing. /" 'Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk /Treasurer . - 3 3 PLANNING REPORT T0: northwest E.ssoci2ted consult6nts, inc. Little Canada Mayor and fity Council Little Canada Planning omnission FROM: David R. Licht DATE: 2 January 1985 RE: Ryan Industrial Park FILE NO: 758.09 - 84.43 BACKGROUND For some time the City has been concerned about the physical condition and maintenance of a number of properties located within the Ryan Industrial Park. At the directive of the City Council; we have gradually proceeded with con- tacting individual property owners and addressing ordinance concerns. To date, we have received total cooperation from all those who we have dealt with and anticipate a similar response as we continue the code enforcement program. Difficulties have, however, been encountered in the process. These have resulted from developments which have occurred prior to the existing ordinance from development being other than that initially proposed and approved and from site layout and building placement which are generally outdated by current standards. This situation has resulted in present buildings being nonconforming plus has hampered resolution of code violations and general site improvements. A case in point is Peterson Maintenance Corporation. At present, this operator is storing materials within the required front yard. As a means to resolve this situation, a new storage structure is proposed towards the "rear" of the property along the north lot line. This placement of the new building will be approxi- mately the sane as the existing structure. This is five feet from the lot line while 15 feet is required. Under normal procedures, a variance would he required to accomplish this proposed site improvement. Given the fact that the Ryan Industrial Park is nearly fully developed and in view of the fact that it is nearly totally impossible for a majority of the properties to conform to present ordinance standards, it is recommended that a conditional use - planned unit development be established for the entire sub- division. The purpose of this classification would be to minimize development standards internal to the area and allow the sites to function and improve without the time and costs involved in processing variances on an individual lot by lot basis. 1J V v‘ 4' " Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission 2 January 1985 Page Two RECOMMENDATION The conditional use permit - planned unit development which is proposed would not alter the type of activities which are allowed. The park would continue with an industrial zoning designation. The modifications suggested would only involve site design standards, which again are difficult if not impossible to achieve due to the approved layout and building placement. The following language is proposed for the planned unit designation in question. "For developments existing or approved prior to 1 January 1985 within the subdivision defined as the Ryan Industrial Park, the following site design standards may be modified subject to the review and approval of the City Council: 1. Side yard setbacks in those cases where building placement results in inadequate space for driveways, parking and vehicle maneuverability. 2. Rear yard setbacks where power line easements, building placement or site configuration create construction problems for accessory build- ings which are appropriate for and enhance the operation and improve- ment of the site and use. 3. Loading docks and curb cut number and location where it can be demonstrated that site configuration and /or building placement necessitate modification of standards for adequate access. 4. Fencing height and location where it can be demonstrated that site configuration, building placement, or easements create difficulties in providing secured storage areas within the parameters established by the Zoning Ordinance." cc: Joseph Chlebeck Lowell Nagovsky Art Ryan 35 ••••• ja4)' RYAN z • 9 • U., • ) 8 , ■3, 3 ) 3 (c ; i" 8 RYAN \'uRCN —n"T•7 „k 4 i° 2 3 • 4 5 - - - - 36 37 -824 (4724B) CAP.b®R; SET ADDRESSING 4 PART LABELS IUIY SIUd la (h.. YO{A IYO$ III YIY IiIXe 104(1X11 SX A) liAX1 ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HEARING ON JAN. 23, 1985 1, 1 53- 79400 - 644 -00 North Star Estates /Fee P. O. Box 2386 St. Paul, MN 55109 Lewis Rustad Jr. & David C Sandberg R & S Automotive 38 Woodlyn W. St. Paul, MN 55113 A J Ryan Landscape Supply Co Inc 3176 Ryan Lane St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 020 -01 Frank Frattalone C/P 3066 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 79400 - 644 -00 Fischbach Properties Inc. 485 Lexington Ave New York, NY 10017 53- 00600 - 070 -38 Peterson Maintenance Corp 2329 - 5th Street White Bear Lake, MN 55110 53- 66000 - 030 -01 RD -JV Investments P. 0. Box 2386 St. Paul, MN 55109 53- 79400- 645 -00 Fuel Economy 95 W. Woodlyn St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 00600 - 070 -38 Richard Jacobsen 3173 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 020 -02 City of St. Paul Attention Water Department St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 03110 - 010 -56 Rose Gervais 5 Owasso Blvd S. St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 00600 - 020 -29 V & L Larson & S Wiegele 3172 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 030 -03 Aetna Life Ins. Co. 1 Civic Ctr Plaza Box 1414 Hartford, CT 06143 53- 61000 - 040 -01 William Gervais 1335 Rose Place St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 00600- 030 -29 William Schifsky 3175 Ryan Lane St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 041 -03 McKesson & Robbins 3230 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 61000 - 040 -01 Richard Schreier & Gerald Mogren & Robert Mogren 2125 Desoto Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 00600 - 230 -30 Vern & Laverne Larson 3172 Spruce Street St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 042 -03 Levitz Furniture Co. of the Midwest 3201 Country Drive St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 03110- 090 -79 City of St. Paul Water Department 216 City Hall St. Paul, MN 55102 53- 03110 - 010 -52 Ralph Mehlhorn 1667 California Ave E St. Paul, MN 55106 53- 66000 - 030 -04 Knox Lumber Company 3203 Country Drive St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 03110 - 130 -79 Ward Bracken Johnson Trust 201 - 2nd Street Stillwater, MN 55082 53- 03110- 140 -79 Roger & Judith Stanke 1250 Josephine Road St. Paul, MN 55113 53- 66000 - 010 -01 Roger Stanke 3159 Country Drive St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000- 010 -01 Townhome Maintenance 3172 Ryan Lane St. Paul, Mn 55117 53- 66000- 070 -04 Russell & Judith Fischer 6363 Jamaca Ave N Stillwater, MN 55082 53- 66000 - 090 -04 Robert Zilge 2515 Morrison Ave St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 011 -06 Rustad Jr. & Sandberg 38 Woodlyn Ave W St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 011 -06 Robert DeBace 81 Bryan St. East St. Paul, MN 55117 53- 66000 - 010 -08 ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HEARING ON JAN. 23, 1985 38 CITY OF LITTLE CA RDA KJTICE OF FOLIC HEARIR0 TEXT A{E!iu :BENT :otice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on the 23rd day of January,1985 at, 0:15 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at,515 Little Canada Road in said City to consider the following. PCOP0000 A!1Ei)D Md!IT. -' DI':d c CTIO5 903.020.0. OF THE LITTLE CANADA ZONING 020 NA'ICE 0 TI!E LIIIL.5 C;cl :,'D, NICIPAL CODE. THE CITY C055CIL Of THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA. DOES (HEREBY 093155 AS 905905:5: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance of the !:unicipal Code, Section 903.020.0.3. is hereby amended to read: "3. Except for farm and agricultural buildings, accessory buildings snail not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height, shall he six (6) feet or more from any ether building or structure on the same lot, and shall not be located within a drainage, utility or access easesent." Section 2. The Zoning Ordinance of the tunicipal Code, Section 903.020.0.4. Is hereby amended to read: "4. No accessory building or garage for a single family d.ellIng shall occupy more than twenty -five (25) percent of a rear yard. Carge space and accessory buildings for a single family detached &selling shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area per lot, except by conditional use permit as provided for in Section 921 of this ordinance. " Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the Y.unicipal Code, Section 903.020,0.5. Is hereby amended to read as follows: :U building permit shall be issued for the construction of nore than one (I) accessory building for each detached single family dwelling, except on the approval of a conditional use permit according to the provisions of Section S21 of this ordinance." Section 4. The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code, Section 903.020.0, Is hereby amended by adding: Every single family droning unit eredted after the effective date of this ordinance shall be so incased on a lot that at least a two (2) car garage, either attached or detached can be located on said lot,' All persons desering to he heard with reference to this matter will he heard during this hearing. Joseph C. Chlebeck Clerk - Treasurer 39 PLANNING REPORT northwest associated consultants, inc. TO: Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission FROM: David Licht DATE: 29 November 1984 RE: Little Canada - Zoning Ordinance Revision FILE NO: 758.09 Upon Mr. Nagovski's suggestion and with the directive of the City Council at their 28 November meeting, we have untaken a draft zoning ordinance text amendment to clarify the language and intent of Section 9O3.O2O.D. which deals with accessory buildings. A copy of the existing ordinance and the proposed amendment are attached. cc: Joseph Chlebeck Lowell Nagovski Tom Sweeney 40 �;�»I Cl_n fl EXISTING ORDINANCE TEXT D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Equipment. 1. An accessory building shall be considered an integral port of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building by a covered passageway. 2. Except for farm buildings, no acceuory buildings shall be erected or located within any required yard other than the rear yonf. 3. Except for form buildings, accessory buildings and garages shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height and shall be five (5) feet or more from all lot lines of adjoining lots, shall be six (6) feet or more from any other building or structure on the soma lot end shall not be located within o utilfy easement. 4. No accessory building or garage for single family dwellings shall occupy more than twenty -five (25) percent of a rear yard, nor exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area, except by conditional use permit as provided for in Section 921 of this Ordinance. 5. No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1) private garage structure for each detached single family dwelling, except on the approval of o conditional use permit according to the provisions of Section 921 of this Ordinance. Every detached single family dweilirg unit erected after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be so located on the lot so thot at least o two (2) car garage, either attached or detached, con be located on said lot. 6. Outdoor swimming pools with a capacity of fifteen hundred (1,500) gallons or with o depth of three (3) feet or more of wa)rer shall be fenced in compliance with F., 6. of this Section. 41 ORDINANCE NO. 24 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 903.020.D. OF THE LITTLE CANADA ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE LITTLE CANADA MUNICIPAL CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code, Section 903.020.D.3. is hereby amended to read: Except for farm and agricultural buildings, accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height, shall be six (6) feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot, and shall not be located within a drainage, utility or access easement." Section 2. The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code, Section 903.020.D.4. is hereby amended to read: "4. No accessory building or garage for a single family dwelling shall occupy more than twenty -five (25) percent of a rear yard. Garage space and accessory buildings for a single family detached dwelling shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area per lot, except by conditional use permit as provided for in Section 921 of this ordinance. " Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code, Section 903.020.D.5. is hereby amended to read as follows: 115. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1) accessory building for each detached single family dwelling, except on the approval of a conditional use permit according to the provisions of Section 921 of this ordinance." Section 4. The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code, Section 903.020.D. is hereby amended by adding: "7. Every single family dwelling unit erected after the effective date of this ordinance shall be so located on a lot that at least a two (2) car garage, either attached or detached can be located on said lot." 42 Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its date of passage and publication. Michael Fahey, Mayor Passed by the City Council of Little Canada, this day of 1985. Joseph G. Chlebeck, Clerk 43 January 9, 1985 Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 167 Courthouse St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 298 -4127 Michael Fahey Mayor of Little Canada 515 East Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 Regional Recreational Bikeway System Plan KENNETH E. WELTZIN Director and County Engineer PHYLLIS F. SPECKER Deputy Director In 1978 Ramsey County prepared a Regional Recreational Bikeway System Plan. That Plan is included in the Ramsey County Comprehensive Plan. Ramsey County Public Works Department proposes to amend Figure 4.5 of the Comprehensive Plan which illustrates the Regional Recreational Bikeway System Plan. A bicycle lane is illustrated in the figure on County Road B2 from Edgerton Street to Arcade Street in Little Canada. The County proposes that the Regional Recreational Bikeway System Plan will include a bicycle lane on County Road B between Edgerton Street and Arcade Street in Maplewood, rather than on County Road B2. County Road B2 and County Road B between Edgerton Street and Arcade Street are similar in traffic volumes, cross traffic, aesthetics, system continuity and land use patterns. They differ, however, in topography. .County Road B2 has grades that would be far more difficult for bicycles to negotiate. Both connect Phalen Regional Park with Lake Gervais County Park. Both Arcade Street and Edgerton Street allow access across T.H. 36; the bridge on Edgerton Street, however, is wider over the highway than the one on Arcade Street, and would better accommodate bicyclists. In addition, County Road B is wider than County Road B2 and could accommodate a bicycle lane at less cost than County Road B2. For these reasons, I request your concurrence in the proposed amendment of the Regional Recreational Bikeway System Plan in the Ramsey County Comprehensive Plan. If you concur, the amendment will be submitted to the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners for their approval. Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director and County Engineer 1<D:m 44 RAMSEY COUNTY RAMSEY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN REGIONAL RECREATIONAL BIKEWAY SYSTEM PLAN 1978 KEY BIKE PATH - BIKE LANE saws BIKE ROUTE El REGIONAL RECREATION OPEN SPACE SITES CITY OF LITTLE CANADA NAME OF ASSESSMENT: WTRMN 7071 ORIGINAL: A. 53 91920 010 04 795.00 B. 53 91920 010 05 795.00 APPORTIONMENT (1) 53 91920 011 04 (2) 53 91920 011 05 1 -8 -85 874.50 715.50 46 Division # 059014 D.P. No. 0068 Aud, # 1205 ,,I smESO? o 20 Minnesota n 1- Department of Transportation a $, _ _ : 4 District 9 T , 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9050 OF TRP� North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 January 10, 1985 Mr. Joseph Chlebeck City Clerk 515 Little Canada Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55117 Dear Mr. Chlebeck: Telephone 779 -1178 SUBJECT: C.S. 6280(I35E East & West Ramps- Country Drive) at Little Canada Road Traffic Signal Revisions As part of our bridge widening project at the I -35E and Little Canada Road interchange, we will be installing temporary traffic signals during the bridge widening /interchange reconstruction portion of the project and permanent traffic signal systems after the road construction portion of the project is complete. The preliminary estimated cost for the temporary and permanent signal systems at each ramp intersection is $120,000.00. We will request Federal funds for the temporary and permanent traffic signal systems. If available, the State will assume the non - Federal share of the construction costs. We propose that the maintenance of these temporary and permanent signal systems be shared as follows: Ramsey County will clean, paint, and relamp the traffic signal system. - Little Canada will provide power to the signal system and will maintain the street lights. - The State will provide all other maintenance If the City of Little Canada wishes to have emergency vehicle pre - emption installed at these signal systems, we will need an official request to do so. If you have any questions or comments, please contact either Mr. Curtis Gobeli or Mr. Bruce Kastner. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P. I District Engineer 47 An Equal Opportunity F:mplgrer CITY OF UTjTTE CANADA J 803.030. OPERATION LOCATION. The applicant shall specify in what location he desires to operate. He shall include in the application both the street address and the legal description of the property. The license when issued, shall be limited to the area described. No license shall be issued unless the property upon which the business is to be conducted is zoned Commercial. The Council may in its discretion permit the use of a used car license on property located in a light industrial zone. The Council in arranging for the approval of the application, shall set up such restrictions as to manner of operation, location of vehicles, limitation of number of vehicles, protection, fencing or screening of the grounds devoted to the use and any other provisions or requirements that may be deemed advisable by the Council in order to preserve the best appearance and to prevent complaints from neighboring property owners. 803.040. RESPONSIBILITY OF OPERATION. Any licensee hereunder shall be held responsible for nuisances emanating from his operating and he shall not permit debris, wreckage, automobile parts, dismantled motor vehicles, or any other kinds of waste or debris from his business to be deposited on any public or private property or on his own property. Licensee shall provide parking area within the confines of his private property to accommodate the motor vehicles of customers so that parking in the area of his place of business will not constitute a traffic hazard or a neighborhood nuisance. 803.050. NOTICE OF REVOCATION. The Council may upon ten (10) days written notice, require the licensee to show cause as to why his license should not be revoked if he fails to live up to the provisions of this Chapter or to any special provisions required by the Council at the time of the issuance of the license. Upon failure to show cause the licensee's rights may be terminated by the Council. (Source: Ord. 45) 804. SOLICITORS. 804.010. TERM. A solicitor, for the purpose of this Chapter, shall be defined to be any person who goes from house to house, or from place to place, in the City, selling or taking orders for, or offering to sell or take orders for, goods, wares or merchandise or any articles for future delivery, or for services to be performed in the future, or for making, manufacturing or repairing of any article or thing whatsoever for future delivery; provided, however, that this Chapter shall apply only to solicitors who demand, accept or receive payment or deposit of money in advance of final delivery. 92 4 ORDINANCE NO. 198 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 804.040 OF TIIE MUNICIPAL CODE OF TIIE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, WIIICII ESTABLISHES A $10.00 FEE FOR SOLICITOR'S PERMIT TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF LITTLE CANADA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 804.040 of the Municipal Code of the City of Little Canada is hereby amended to read as follows: 804.040. PERMIT FEE. Upon payment of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to the City Treasurer, the Clerk shall issue a solicitor's non- transferable permit for the period of one (1) year, permitting said person to operate as a solicitor, as herein provided. Any person, upon the expiration of the term of his permit, may renew same by paying an annual fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00), said application for renewal to be made to the Clerk. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of Little Canada this 27 day of Oct. 27 , 1982. Attest: //` ! . J./ Wosepl:i G. Chlebeck, Clerk Ayes -- 5- Nays -- 0- 4 9 7c2 • Mayor 804.020. PERMIT. It shall be unlawful for any person to act as solicitor within the meaning of this Chapter without first securing a permit from the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions hereto. 804.030. WRITTEN APPLICATION. That hereafter any applicant for a permit to engage in the business of a solicitor, as herein defined, shall file with the City Clerk a written application for such permit, on a form to be provided, stating the name and address of the applicant, the name and address of the person, firm or corporation which he represents, the kind of goods offered for sale, or kind of service performed. In the case of certain solicitations covering the entire City, the Council may waive licenses and require a surety bond in such amount as the Council may determine. Such bond, when required, shall provide for indemnification if any funds paid to solicitors are fraudulently or unlawfully diverted by solicitors or those responsible for the solicitation. 804.040. PERMIT FEE. Unon navment of nnA n.,tl ($1.00) to the City SEC -804- 040 - AMENDED ORD. 198 see ble permit for the page 92 -A- as a solicitor, as herein providea. Any person, upou uie enpiia...L.,.. _ ___ _ :m of his permit, may renew same by paying an annual fee of One Dollar ($1.00), said application for renewal to be made to the Clerk. (Source: Ord. 38) 805. WAGON VENDORS 805.010. LICENSE. No person who sells any merchandise, including popcorn, soft drinks, ice cream or other confectionery from a wagon, truck, automobile, pushcart or other vehicle shall operate in the City without first procuring a license for such business as herein provided; except that this shall not apply to farmers selling their own produce. 805.020. APPLICATION AND FEE. Application for a wagon vendor's license shall be made to the Clerk of the City on a form to be provided by the Clerk. The fee for such license shall be Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) per year, and the license period shall be the calendar year. The license fee for any part of a year shall be the same as for a full year. The Clerk shall first obtain approval of the Council before issuing such license. 805.030. RESPONSIBILITIES. Any licensee hereunder shall be held responsible for nuisance emanating from his operation; and, shall not permit 5 0 93