Laserfiche WebLink
It appears as tnouch P '.V.2.C. is not consistent in their <br />recommendations. A report dated September 1, 19E3 (copy <br />enclosed) dealing with the same occupancy, Speedy r,larket, <br />recommends parking over storage tanks. I don't see why it <br />is not recommended on this report. <br />The plot plan submitted shows landscaping, signs, poles, <br />Grass and curbs existing. I would think that if this is <br />not acceptable, that suggestions for what is acceptable <br />would be conveyed to the owner at the meeting instead of <br />making him submit a new plan without new direction from the <br />Commission. <br />The application and my talk with the Company representative <br />do not indicate any change in size or location of signs. <br />Should there be a change it can be handled at the time <br />according to the ordinance. <br />Respectfully, <br />Bud fagovsky <br />BN:bj <br />Enc: <br />16 <br />