The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-23-1986 Council AgendaAGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JULY 23, 1986 A. 1. Call to Order - 7:30 p.m. Tape No. to 2. Roll Call Mayor Mr. Michael Fahey Councilwoman Mrs. Beverly Scalze Councilman Mr. William Blesener Councilman Mr. Rick Collova Councilwoman Ms. Mugs Nardini Attorney Mr. Thomas Sweeney Engineer Mr. Donald Carley Planner Mr. David Licht Mr. Steve Grittman Recording Secretary Mrs. Kathy Glanzer Clerk /Treasurer Mr. Joseph Chlebeck Building Official Mr. John Palacio Guest 3. Approval of Minutes: July 2, 1986 July 9, 1986 B. BOND SALE AND CONSTRUCTION BIDS: Tape No. 4. Bond Sale - 7:00 p.m. See correspondence pages 1 thru 5. 5. Construction Bids for: Imp. 86 -12 Centerville Rd. Storm Sewer Imp. 86 -13 Thunder Bay Storm Sewer Ponding Imp. 85 -2 County Rd. B -2 Lift Station Award to: For Imp. 86 -12, 86 -13 & Lift C. HEARINGS Tape No. 6.IMPROVEMENT. 86 -15 - SYLVAN.ST.. By: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Curb & Gutter Road & Storm Sewer From County Rd. C to Demont Hearing scheduled for 7:30 p.m. See Correspondence: Notice of Hearing Page 12 Mailing List Page 13 Feasibility Report Page 14 Map Page 15 Comments & Objections Motion to Close Hearing Motion 7. TEXT AMENDMENT Tape No. Rehabilitation Centers Hearing scheduled for 7:45 p.m. See Correspondence: Notice of Hearing Planning Commission Report Planner's Report Proposed Ordinance No. 272 Page 16 Page 9 Pages 17 -20 Pages 21 & 22 Comments & Objections Close Hearing Adoption of Ordinance No. 272 Introduced the Ordinance Seconded the Adoption 8. NORTH SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER Tape No. to CUP (Conditional Use Permit) Rehabilitation Center Hearing Scheduled for 7:50 Appearing: Phillip Saari See Correspondence: Notice of Hearing Mailing Notice Map and Parking Planning Commission Comments & Objections Close Hearing Council Actions Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Pages 7 thru 9 9. REZONING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF 1.P. .DISTRICT TO R-1 Tape No. Hearing scheduled for 8:00 p.m. See Correspondence: Notice of Hearing Mailing List Map Planner's Report Planning Commission Report Comments & Objections Close Hearing Motions Page 26 Pages 27 -29 Page 30 Pages 31 & 32 Pages 10 & 11 (tabled) C. PRESENTATIONS 10 COLLOVA LOT SPLIT See Correspondence: Planning Commission Planner's Report Location Map Division Motions: Tape No. to Page 7 Page 33 Page 35 Pages 36 & 37 11. LARSON. LOT, SPLIT See Correspondence: Planning Commission Planner's Report Location Map Division Motions: 12. KENNEDY PROPOSAL See Correspondence: Planner's Report Tape No. Page 6 Page 38 -40 Page 41 Page 42 Tape No to Pages 43 -49 13. MRS. KLEIN - LITTLE CANADA MINI STORAGE Tape No to D. OLD . BUS_INESS. Engineer's Reports* 14. County Rd. B -2 Matter - 15. Kingsbury Matter - 16. Edgerton & Sunrise Dr.- 17. Canabury Pone - Correspondence Page 53 Correspondence Page 54 Correspondence Page 55 Correspondence Page 56 Administration :, Mr. Fahey 18. Overtime matter. Planner 19. Other Business at 102 County Rd. C (Frattalone Building) E. NEW BUSINESS Planner 20. Driveway 21. Accessory Building Setbacks Tape No. to E. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) Attorney 22. Reports Tape No. to Engineer 23. Spruce St. Correspondence Page 50 24. Round Lake Overlook Correspondence Page 51 25. Storm Sewer - Thunderbay Correspondence Page 52 26. Amending Resolution No. 86 -6 -276 by Indicating the Following Street as M 3 >A> Demont from Rice to Canabury Dr. (35E) Canabury Dr. from Demont to Co. Rd. B -2 Co. Rd. B -2 from Canabury Dr. to Rice St. All as separate routes. (Note actions not taken in July 9 minutes) F. COUNCIL REPORTS 27. Public Safety: 28. Building & Zoning: 29. Utilities 30. Parks & Recreation: Ms. Nardini Mr. Collova Mr. Biesener Mrs. Scalze. A. Call for quotations to resurface and recoat tennis court. (Project under $10,000.00) - Quotations (Project over $10,000.00) - Need Sealed Bids. B. Send Thank You Leter to Howie Prudhomme for Purchasing & Planting Flowers in Spooner Park 31. Administration: Mr. Fahey 32. Adjourn CORRESPONDENCE TO AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JULY 23, 1986 PAGES CONTENTS 1 -5 Bond Sale 6 -11 Planning Commission 12 -15 Hearing - Improvement 86 -15 - Sylvan 16 -22 Hearing - Text Amendment - Rehabilitation Center 23 -25 Hearing - CUP - North Suburban Development Achievement Center - Rehabilitation Center 26 -32 Hearing - Rezoning certain portions of I.P. District from I.P. to R -1 33 -37 Lot Split - Rick Collova 38 -42 Larson Lot Split 43 -49 Kennedy Building 50 -56 Various Engineer reports EXHIBIT B OFFICIAL TERMS OF BOND SALE $2,375,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1986, CONSISTING OF $1,515,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STORM SEWER BONDS OF 1986, $340,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STATE -AID STREET BONDS OF 1986 AND $520,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1986 CITY OF-LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that these bonds will be offered for sale according to the following terms: TIME AND PLACE: TYPE OF BONDS: DATE OF ORIGINAL ISSUE OF BONDS: PURPOSE: Sealed bids on these bonds will be opened on Wednesday, July 23, 1986, at 11 :00 A.M., Central Time at the offices of Juran & Moody, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota. Consideration of the bids and the award of the sale will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day at the City Hall in the City of Little Canada, Minnesota. Fully registered general obligation bonds, $5,000 or larger denomina- tions at the option of the bidder. August 1, 1986. To defray the expense of the construction of various improvements in the City's Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District, the construction of state -aid streets, and the construction of various improvements in the City. ,•v 1 INTEREST PAYMENTS: `July 1, 1987, and semiannually thereafter on January 1 and July 1. MATURITIES: January 1 in each of the years and amounts as follows: General General Obligation General Obligation State -Aid Obligation Storm Sewer Street Bonds Improvement Year Bonds of 1986 of 1986 Bonds of 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $215,000 $215,000 $415,000 $530,000 REDEMPTION: 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 55,000 $ 60,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 60,000 S 60,000 $ 60,000 S 60,000 $ 60,000 At the option of the Issuer, bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1995 shall be subject to prior payment, on January 1, 1994 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price of par and accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the bonds subject to prepayment. If redemp- tion is in part, the bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity date shall be prepaid first and if only part of the bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment the specific bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Registrar. 2 BOND REGISTRAR: CUSIP NUMBERS: DELIVERY: The successful bidder will name the Registrar and paying agent which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations and to the approval of the Issuer. Principal will be payable at the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest will be payable by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder of the bond at his address as it appears on the books of the Registrar. The Issuer will pay reasonable and customary Charges for the services of the Registrar. If the bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any bond nor any error with respect thereto shall constitute cause for a failure or refusal by the Purchaser thereof to accept delivery of and pay for the bonds in accordance with terms of the purchase contract. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser. Forty days after award subject to approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota. Bond printing and legal opinion will be paid by Issuer and delivery will be anywhere in the continental United States without cost to the Purchaser. Legal opinion will be printed on the bonds at the request of the successful bidder. TYPE OF BID: RATES: AWARD: Sealed bids of not less than $2,339',375 and accrued interest on the principal sum of $2,375,000 from date of original issue of the bonds to date of delivery must be filed with the undersigned prior to the time of sale. Bids must be unconditional except as to legality. A certified or cashier's check in the amount of $47,500, payable to the order of the Clerk- Treasurer of the Issuer must accompany each bid, to be forfeited as liquidated damages if bidder fails to comply with accepted bid. Bids for the bonds should be addressed to: Joseph Chlebeck, Clerk- Treasurer City Hall 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 All rates must be in integral multiples of 1 /20th or 1 /8th of 1% and may not exceed the maximum rate allowed by law at the time of sale. No limitation is placed upon the number of rates which may be used. Award will be made solely on the basis of lowest dollar interest cost, determined by addition of any discount to and deduction of any premium from the total interest on all bonds from their date to their stated maturity. The net effective average rate of the issue may not exceed the maximum rate allowed by law at the time of sale. The Issuer reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive informalities and to adjourn the sale. 4 Dated: June 11, 1986 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Joseph Chlebeck Clerk- Treasurer Additional information may be obtained from: JURAN & MOODY, INC. Minnesota Mutual Life Building 400 North Robert Street Suite 800 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone No: 612 - 224 -1500 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA July 10, 1986 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the 10th day of July, 1986 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City. Chairman Peter Costa called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and the following members were present at roll call: MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Costa, Chairman Bill Davison Gene DeLonais Art Herkenhoff Thomas Perlinger Peggy Schweizer Sharon Timmons, arrived 7:40 P.M. ALSO PRESENT: David Licht, Planner Kathleen Glanzer, Recording Secretary Approval There being no corrections to the June 12, 1986 Planning Commission Of The minutes, the minutes were approved as submitted. Minutes Larson Lot Mr. Dan Larson appeared before the Commission requesting approval Split of the division of 12 feet from his Lot 1 on Twin Lake Trail and the adding of this 12 feet to Lot 2. Larson reported that a house was recently built on Lot 2 and it is encroaching onto Lot 1 by 1.7 feet. Larson pointed out that he will be purchasing 12 feet from the Mitchell property and will be coming in with this division in the future. However, there will still be adequate frontage on Lot 1 and a home can be built on the lot and proper setbacks can be maintained. The Planner reported that the subdivision is acceptable and recommended approval. However, the City Engineer should review the necessity of drainage and utility easements. Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the Larson lot split contingent upon the recommendations contained in the Planner's letter of July 7, 1986 for submission of a Certificate of Survey and the City Engineer's review of drainage and utility easements. Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. Motion carried 6 - 0. MINUTES Planning Commission July 10, 1986 Collova Mr. Rick Coll ova appeared before the Commission requesting a Property realignment of lot lines for property on McMenemy so that a Division home can he constructed on one of the lots. There would still be three lots, however, lot lines would be adjusted so that Code could be met on one of the lots in order to build on it. All three lots would met Code requirements and setbacks would be adequate. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Collova resubdivision contingent upon the Engineer's review of drainage and utility easements and submission of a Certificate of Survey. Motion seconded by Mr. DeLonais. Motion carried 7 - 0. Rehabili- Mr. Phil Saari of the North Suburban Developmental Achievement tation Center appeared before the Commission requesting that this Center facility he allowed to locate in the front of the building North used for bingo on Rice Street. Suburban DAC Saari explained that this program involved mentally - handicapped adults, 21 years old and over. They currently have 85 adults enrolled in this program and its hours of operation are 9 A.M. until 3:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The purpose of the program is to train these adults so that they can work in the community or in places of employment. In -house work is provided as a means of training. This work includes collating, assembling, small -hand work. The work is not delivered in trucks, but rather in vans or cars. Saari also explained that the purpose of the program is not to have people remain in it indefinitely, but to try to get these people out into the community. Timmons asked what means of transportation these people use to get to the facility. Saari explained that presently they have three school buses bringing in students, but since the facility will be located on a public bus line, some of the students who are able will use the public bus. Saari reported that they are proposing to lease 9,000 square feet, and have an option to lease an additional 1,700. The building is, completely sprinklered. DeLonais asked if this portion of the building was separated from the bingo hall. Saari replied that it was. MINUTES Planning Commission July 10, 1986 North Saari reported that the North Suburban DAC is presently located Suburban in the Falcon Heights Learning Center, but that building will be DAC (Cont.) reopened as a school in the fall, and, thus, the need to relocate. The facility had previously been located in the Old Little Canada School building until that building was sold. A property owner across the street from the proposed site, was concerned about the facility and the supervision that would be given to the program participants. Saari reported that the program is very structured. There is a staff of 15 for the 85 clients. Only those clients that have the ability, will be allowed to use public transportation. Also, clients will not be allowed out of the building alone and supervision is provided to the clients. DeLonais asked the effect of the afternoon bingo sessions on Parking. The Planner stated that he did not see a conflict and there would be sufficient parking. Saari agreed and stated that they would be utilizing the parking in the front of the building. Schweizer asked if there would be supervision for clients as they arrive or leave on buses. Saari replied that staff would go out to meet the buses and would take clients to the buses when leaving to ensure that they get on and off buses safely. Timmons asked if the number of clients would increase if the program expanded into the 1,700 square feet. Saari replied that in order to increase their capacity, they have to go through a needs assessment with the State. They are going through this process now due to the relocation. Saari reported that the program has been expanding by 4 to 6 clients per year. Also, the program is inspected yearly and licensed by the State Hunan Services Department. Timmons asked how much square footage the program currently occupies. Saari replied 6,500 square feet. An adjacent property asked why these people were coming to this area. Saari replied that these people have always been in this area and explained the areas that these adults are currently residing. Saari also reported that the ,forth Suburban DAC has been in existence since 1961. 8 MINUTES Planning Commission July 10, 1986 North The property owner was concerned about the amount of traffic on Suburban Rice Street and the threat this posed to the clients. DAC (Cont.) Saari replied that they have been located on busy streets in the past. Also, the State requires that they do a vulnerable adults inventory on each individual to determine what protections the individual needs. Timmons felt that there was a need in the community for this type of facility and pointed out that it has been a part of the community for many years as well as the Lake Owasso Home. The Planner reported that if the Commission wishes to approve the request of the North Suburban DAC, it should first act on the proposed text amendment allowing a rehabilitation center in this area. Timmons was concerned that over -night facilities not be allowed. The Planner replied that this is already covered that no over -night care will he allowed. Davison asked if the conditional use permit would allow the City a periodic review of this facility. The Planner replied that if there are any complaints against the facility, they can be reviewed against the criteria set forth in the conditional use permit. If there is a problem, the City has the option of taking either criminal action or civil action. Another protection for the City is the State license. Timmons asked how the center ensures that its clients actually get on the public transportation. Saari replied that staff takes the clients to the bus and ensures they get on. For a time, staff will ride the bus with the client to be sure that the client is capable of using public transportation. DeLonais asked where the funding comes from for this facility. Saari replied that 50% comes from the State, 50% from the County and, hopefully, in the future some will come from the bingo hall. Mr. Herken'noff recommended approval of the proposed text amendment adding rehabilitation centers as a conditional use permit in H -'a, B-3 and Public Districts and based on this approval, recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit requested by the North Suburban Developmental Achievement Center. Motion seconded by Mr. Perlinger. Motion carried 7 - O. 4 MINt1TES Planning Commission July 10, 1936 Rezoning The Planner reported that in discussing Desoto Avenue and the Certain development of the I -P District Council has suggested that the Portion Of west 180 feet of DeSoto be rezoned R -1 in order to be compatible I -P District with the zoning on the east side of DeSoto. The Planner reported that there was concern that if DeSoto were improved, the industrial property could not be assessed for this improvement unless it was allowed to access the street. However, there is also the means of paying for the improvement of DeSoto through tax increment financing. If the industrial property was not assessed for DeSoto, it could be refused access to it. Mrs. Timmons was concerned that should Allen Avenue go through, the industrial property would have access to DeSoto through Allen Avenue. The Planner suggested that Allen Avenue through the I -P District could be vacated, but the City could retain a utility easement. DeLonais asked why R -2 or R -3 was not being considered for the west side of DeSoto as this would provide a transitional area between the industrial park and the R -1 east of DeSoto. Herkenhoff asked if there would be a suitable buffer between the industrial park and R -1. Timmons pointed out that with the high -tech industry the City would like to attract for this area, and 200 foot deep lots, the lots themselves would serve as somewhat of a buffer zone. David Heller representing Gardner Bros. Homes, stated that they are not interested in having the back portion of their property rezoned to R -1. They have plans for mini - warehouses on this property. The Planner pointed out that the industrial land would be required to buffer to the lesser zoning. Also, the depth of the lots would protect the residences as well. The Planner also pointed out that it is good planning to have like uses facing each other. The Planner also pointed out that if the property west of DeSoto would not he rezoned, Gardner Bros. would still have to provide a buffer along DeSoto and would not be able to use the property up to the street anyway. DeLonais suggested that the matter be tabled for further study. :v�_. 10 MINUTES Planning Commission July 10, 1986 Rezoning Certain Portion Of I -P District Adjourn Timmons askedhow tabling the matter will effect the Gardner Bros. proposal. The Planner pointed out that there is already a concern with the Gardner Bros. proposal in that there are not utilities to the site. The Planner stated that whenever there is a question on availability of utilities, it is a longer process to get approvals on a development. David Heller stated that Gardner Bros. had hoped to begin construction this fall. Timmons stated that Gardner Bros was at a disadvantage being the first development proposed for the area. Timmons also stated that in order to attract developers to the area, sewer and water will have to be brought to the site. The Planner stated that the question was who is going to pay for the utilities and pointed out that sewer and water are at the south end of the site and Gardner Bros. property is at the north end. There is the question of whether or not the property owners will be in favor of the improvement. Timmons felt that with regard to the rezoning, it is more desirable to have single fancily homes across from each other. Timmons did not think there would be a problem for the single family homes on the west of DeSoto to have industrial behind them due to the size of the buffer zone and the high -tech industry proposed for the area. Mr. DeLonais recommended that the rezoning of a certain portion of the I -P District to R -1 be tabled for further study and input from the property owners in the area. Motion seconded by Mr. Herkenhoff. Motion carried 7 - 0. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended that the meeting be adjourned. Motion seconded by Mrs. Timmons. Notion carried 7 - 0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:43 P.M. Respectfully submijited, Kathleen Glanzer, Record-Mg Secretary .1JV... 11 Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVSIENT 86 -15 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, MN JULY 23, 1986 AT 7:30 P.M. MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalze Bill Blesenar Rick Collova Mugs Nardini Improvement 86 -15 Sylvan Street from County Road "C" to Demont NATURE OF IMPROVEMENT: BY Grading, sanitary sewer, watennain, storm sewer, bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter The estimated cost is $337,300 The general nature and location of the improvement is amplified in the preliminary engineering report on file with the City Clerk. The area proposed to be assessed for this improvement is all lots and tracts of land abutting said streets to be improved. All pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.011 to 429.11 (laws 1953 Chapter. 398 as amended). Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk MAILING LIST IMPROVEMENT 86 -15 NAME ADDRESS Parcel no. Robert & Germaine Nash Joseph & Carol Nash Stephen & Annette La Casse Louis & Lena La Casse Robert Pine p 11 Eugene & Joan Fasciana Frank & Janice Graczyk Richard White N.E. Finkelson Francis Flandrick Glen Vanguilder Harold & Lois Wylie Carol Grogan Marc & Jacqueline Brant Terrance & Roberta Mc Teague Rockner & Elaine Waite Kenneth Hauth Douglas & Luz Amya Day 20 E. Co. Rd. C 10 E. Co. Rd. C 3027 Lake St. N 2605 Stark 1041 Gervais 735 Keller Parkway 13 Demont 2600 Spruce 2612 Spruce 3008-4th St. S 2560 Spruce 2556 Spruce 9 Demont 2573 Stark 2565 Stark 2561 Lakeshore 6736 Gretchen Place 2540 Spruce 07- 29 -22 -21 -0038 07- 29 -22 -21 -0039 07- 29 -22 -21 -0040 07- 29 -22 -21 -0041 07- 29 -22 -21 -0042 07- 29 -22 -21 -0043 07- 29 -22 -21 -0044 07- 29 -22 -21 -0049 07- 29 -22 -21 -0054 07- 29 -22 -21 -0055 07- 29 -22 -21 -0056 07- 29 -22 -21 -0057 07- 29 -22 -21 -0059 07- 29 -22 -21 -0060 07- 29 -22 -21 -0063 07- 29 -22 -21 -0065 07- 29 -22 -21 -0066 07- 29 -22 -21 -0067 07- 29 -22 -21 -0068 07- 29 -22 -21 -0107 FEASIBILITY REPORT SYLVAN STREET CITY OF LITTLE CANADA IMPROVEMENT 86 -12 G JUN 18 1986 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA LOCATION: Sylvan Street from County Road "C" to Demont NATURE OF IMPROVEMENT: Grading; sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. INITIATION : Petition ADEQUACY OF PETITION: Petitioners own more than 35% of assessable frontage. RIGHT -OF -WAY : Adequate EASEMENTS: None Required SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The lots fronting on County Road "C" and Demont are already served by streets and utilities. Therefore they would not be benefitted by the improvement. The frontage of these lots has not been included in the overall assessable frontage. There may be a problem in constructing the south end of this street because of the steep grade and location of houses. ESTIMATE COST: This will be determined by the survey. Construction $ 221,500.00 Contingency 22,150.00 Legal 13,290.00 Fiscal 11,075.00 Administration 4,430.00 Engineering 39,870.00 312,315.00 Capital Interest 24,985.00 $ 337,300.00 Assessable Frontage . . . . 1,950 ft. Cost per foot 157.43 Cost per 75 ft. lot . . . 11,807.00 14 ••t enJ As•nt• lets 8. 9aa41 447 C O 0 , 6 7 , r5 4 IIMII 71). 4 J“ 47 43145 5 A 12F): 7 etT.42 r_ (lb) 1 o4 +e P ARK {c IN .47ac (30) -r J K 2 3a5.,;3•t 7 (31) a 740.39 s3- 550oo- 2-51-ce t O 918 (`) (1� 7I6 5141312 1 17 514s 1 47 11 41 aA '2 4 46 4 4 _151 +JJj+ei_ '6 17 18 ▪ 19 • 1. IC 4. 40 • 2D 39 (a) 21 4 38_ 22. I 37(4)_ (7) 25 '3 S. 24 r 95 6k11-10: 114 25I26117I2vp a i • I 3031 2 33 34 ss 3S it/•I•I• 1: .11 09;61714 5141312 11w~..'11n 14 r(u',12 15 k" • 46 14-1- 45 14 4 _ 17 54 ' 20 21_ it 25 4') 3 4a #`• / 147 24 1 43 42 41(51) t 40 • -39 f 65 37 (5G 56 37 • u N0 V/ (t) 4Y a /A OA D t N 60 5 3. A 11" 48 4) • 46 • 5 5 41_5444 _ 4' 4 43 • 7-1.7r 42 • • 19 44 1 - -- p5 40 QO ..,3 • a. z 1 38 ?2 - 1'501 E3 % JDIE z5'24i 7,2113'501311321331 3 5 1 x 5 1 (- I -1- . 25 ST 1 716 .5 4131211: 4f • !L' 48 • 2 • 47 • 15 ,' 1 4,,502 • 44 4 45 • 44 • �43w01. I__ —142"7 1 I 41 4 1 1� 40 poi`, • 35 • 38 • 22 3_ I 25 54. • _ y2 ]C 7 45 14/ • z `IU1 52 • 1 27l l.0 4(50 b ' ..• 20 : •31 2��-1.1� ` •.r..� _.� D E t�1 O N 1 tI� .E., C 015 F-:11(:7114 514 312 rI 4e 12 1" • 440) .15 h• 14 1 \ 1 - . 03 . 19 ��//�� 4 W • i 45 V2 • 17 e.` 19 .I ,L °. 21 14.0 4 _I__ 45 • 44 (it. 22 23 4 n / 42 41 a0 30 A 25 L'2728' 1' 344, .5 nIn • 46 5 8 16 51413 21144 7 11 • " 12' 43 4 ,' 14 48 47 —74 4 4 1_4-5 • . 1 • 1 15 16 • 1 17 Z i -•l • - -1'1.._5 'CC Q L35 Q 37 .7c7 �/ —_ J —� 34 • • >- xj 3 __ T._ 33 ''' 31 !. aJ .4 433121 • -42 • • • 2 24 u u 0 4'Z...)•�-1.1.. Irti *o; 817j61514131J K15� p 1 1 48 .4 n -_ 47 13 I 44 4 45 45 4.4 111116 1 43 •7 42 16 1 14 44 s 20 I r 35 `16• `21 tJ Y 38 1721 37 • 2.3 i 36 C4 35 25 } 2.4 2712813 90134 7z 93 1 11 14i4 r1t5I .. . .Iz 51413 2 ! 11 Y :e 4* • I ' J2 poe of (39) 14 (9t, 45 15 V(�7)41 :.._L16116 +�••. 11os)A5 n ^. `- 42 18 — 41 1911?1 153148 _,, 21 4(1' S8 (.'b1 J 25 36 5C 25 (M1'1 34 (24 • r t 44) 35 • ,x-27 i "5) 32 Lt71 71 C 5,0 r. • • , IIY� r 1 Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA TEXT AMENDMENT MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalze Bill Blesener Rick Conova Mugs Nardini Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Little Canada will hold a public hearing on July 23, 1986 beginning at ..m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center to discuss the following: PROPOSAL: Amend the Little Canada Zoning Code by adding rehabilitation centers as a conditional use permit in B -W, B -3, and Public Districts. The conditional uses are as follows: 1. No overnight facilities are provided for the patron served. Patrons are delivered and removed daily. 2. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided in compliance with Section 903.050 of this Ordinance. 3. The site and related parking and service shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. 4. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 903.110 of this Ordinance. 5. The provisions of Section 921.010, C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. All those desiring to be heard regarding this matter will be heard during this hearing. 'Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk 16 MEMORANDUM northwest 2ssociated Co TO: Little Canada Planning Commission FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: 8 July 1986 RE: North Suburban DAC Zoning Amendment /CUP FILE NO: 758.09 - 86.18 S ItwtS, IrC. TrIgni4 JUL 9 1986 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA BACKGROUND North Suburban DAC is a rehabilitation center for mentally retarded adults. The purpose of this state licensed facility is to provide vocational training for mentally handicapped adults to permit them to achieve some level of vocational competency. These facilities offer only day time training and attempt to establish a work environment that is similar to real job conditions. The North Suburban DAC is a private, nonprofit facility that contracts with Ramsey County to provide their training facilities. Currently the DAC wishes to lease 8,000 square feet of floor area at 2,940 Rice Street. This site contains the Little Canada Bingo Hall. The site is currently zoned I -1, Light Industrial District. Within this zoning district, the rehabilitation center is not an allowed use. Review of the Little Canada Zoning Ordinance indicates that this unique facility is not directly addressed. The most comparable uses would be a day care facility which is a conditional use permit in the "P ", Public District, or a trade school which is a permitted use in the "I ", Light Industrial District. Since this rehabilitation center facility is not directly addressed within the Zoning Ordinance, an ordinance amendment is being requested. Staff review recommended that if the City chooses to amend the ordinance, such facilities be treated as conditional uses. In light of this staff recommendation, North Suburban DAC wishes to process a CUP simultaneous to the City's consideration of the zoning amendment. 1820 minnetonka blvd., src 200, munneapolts, mn 55416 (61 2) 925 -9420 ZONING AMENDMENT: 0 a) Y 4- c N 4- E 4 0 N C Cl N E N a S O +u C C L O U N N O) C N'j C O O l 4- Q CI C -C o 1- N TO Y 4, C 0 U AZI 4-- 3 0) 4_ .. O > N O L 6 Y) al 7. N E L .G Y i) 3 N L N0 Y N 0) U L - 4-) 4 O 'O N > V 0 Y 0. N L � N i U N N 4 L L O V C N 0) C N O = Y N N S- 0 6n- O Y L -o CU 0 0 0) U 0 N C 0 0 a-' T 0) O Y C L L Y 0) r- 0 C N N Y Cn E N N O N L 4` C C 0 V C Y Y Y 0 0 .0 r .0 L. E O N C L > N N V •5- N C L L a m> .0 u 0 • C, v 0) 4-' CCi nv 0 T 40 1. O - • • N '0 (I) V E Y N Cu c E Y i N Y N a) V Ip 0 N •� E N O Cl C N C.- o •.- 0_ •u - 0 � E 0 N O C T O' Y o V r 0 0 0 , 0 O m r L In T .0 jr 1- N 0 N 0 N N N N O N a N' C 4 . 4 V •- 4 - 1 5- ' ?' In • 4 Y L V C 7 O) Cr ar O 0 'r- Y r Cl N Y '- O Y > > N 0 0 Cn> CO N = i N s- o 44 0> 0) C •- - Y .� C O 0 '0 U 0 "O > N N .- Y 0 i' 4 V 4 0 0 0 •- C L L N U Y ry L C OI 0 N N > L d Y C N U V N N • ^ N 0 L O N a d 0 ++ L - O O t V CJ _ N ++ T OI CU a+-, E Y 4. Y a o.51 r .N Y +■ 0 r N n L 7 0 0 N N r- 0 N +0 N L a 0 = 0) r Y a'1 N T O - U N 0 L + o E 0 0 > Y +' +-. := O Y' L •- i 4- O L U.) • 0 0 0 0 c] o r Y 1 4- E N ' U O O `0 O N V- ^ 4- N 0 N Y 4 V 6..- 7 U E 50 Y E N r .0 50 0 4 `. N 4- C1 0 .0 CO '0 N 0 'r 0 0 0 (- 7 4- -Cs O of C ry 0 a o L VT - r N 4- V 0 a) •■ N O N E a) 10 4 N 5- .0 Co 0 r f- O 0 L O N W N O C- > +' C •• O 07 r Y ( Y S- N 5- Cu r a 0 0I C 0 0 0 V r N 0 a) C 0 CV r r O C C 0 0 4 Y r N N L a- N a O Y C Y T N 0. 0 '0 0 O o,•- N++ > E 0 U 0r i O'C Y C E•� r'O O 0 0 4- a) m 0 r (0 CO E .- •0- al u 0 O 4- .- V) r O 0 N Y r C • 0 U Y N 1`- 4- 0 C) '•- •E 0 r N T V N CO 0 Y V Y as +-I N 4- U U N C) L 4 v I- CO S- � O C 7 C d A+ N H 0 r0 L r C E 0" 0 '- 0 4- C r 0 C ^ r 3- 0 "•- :- 'a N Y .0 +' 'D _ 0 N d I] O U CO V- O 0 O C C) Cl • Y N Y Y N 6 E 0 d Y a) • "'0 0 N 0 C N .0 N O as a. E N o 0 L 0 0 0 L O 0 N L O .0 %- L L O L L - E a-+ N 0 L 0 1-- Y VI L= Y a "O 4 1- 1-" U H 6 F- E VI 2 V !- r. ^Y M U N L CO L C) - +I 4- T N 4-r a)••- 0r .=0 to Y 0 0) 0 C 0 L N Y T .0 N 7 T 0. O O Y N L, - L C 0 r O L F- N 0>> N3 N r C 4-r 0 N co r N 4 Y Y 0 0 C '•- C N C) V ••- 0 E c N N 0 0 0 0 U CO • Y 4-) 0 ^ 0 01 .0c O 0 =c 3- _ V 'f ( Y N C rC] N C N O N N IO 3 0 Y 'O cL Y 1.. 4-' 0 .- 4-, r Q' 10 N C L L r 0 - U C) ✓ a-' •� N al '•- V N co C T 000 G a 0) L 0 C W a U d •• N •-■ CU N N L 04r C)+ 0) r 0 C Cl. a-' C L .0 N O ' 01 O 4-' N r N a J N .. Z N r Cl '•- '.7 4 4 0 N 4) 50 0 0) r 04 F- as as Y F- r 0 N 0 .2-: r--. e^ N al Z -0 Yd C' LL- •- Y Cn N N N H al 7 N U G V 0' N a) 0 4 0.0 = 41 N 0.0 L O C (1' a� N 0 CC > 4 0 1- O N CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS: N 4 T r O 'r a) 04 U N C L 0 C O C a) 0 0. O U O "0 C N 0'O Y0 N N 0 N 10 r• r Y T no 0 (0 Y +) 0• _ N r N ' M N 04 "r- > -0 r 0 L C 0 o L O p Cn t a0 r 0 E 0 U 44 4 N N V- U) 0 0 N • N N n- 4- u - C i O O .•- L 44 C) = a) U N.0 r V Y 0) L > 0 10 4- E N r- N 0) 4- (I) N4- >4-r ON 0r 4 L 0) 0 L 0r Cl C) 0 a L N3 V V 0O N Y 3 >+a L '- 0 IO N co a O Y 4- > N 0 4 (0 -C 1- 3 rt O Y 0 0 '0 0 5- 0 0 0 E L'0 CM NYn- al Q EC L NT N 0I 3 NC Nr E L> C C ••- 0 0 O ' O) N L L1.1 10'x- '-O -YY'r- C0 a) L r L U4- ') 0• 0 Y +) N N N L 1) N a) 4- a0 E U C O. a) 0 N 0 Or N E 0 .') N 0 a) 0. O r L L U U 4- 0 0 Y 0 N 4 O Y O O N •r- L 4) to U 4- C N'r- C N O L Y 0) 0 .- ++ U Y ••- (1) 4 N L L ^ 4- N L 0 0 05-0 5-." O 4-' a) O 0) Y N N C Y 3 N 4.0 •O 0 4- 0 N r Co C N "O C -4 C L 1 CO N aY N r C C N '•- C Y Y 4- V 0 ' .- ( O r 0 •0 (J L N 4- 0 C L 4 0•1 N r On Cl. ON Nal0 CL N4 N 0 ` al 0 O r NLE C0 >1.. L .0 -• O. + N O 01 N 0 0 0 0 Y co 4 ' t/ E 0 r 0 N L 4 4. > 0 o 0 •N C V N 0 0 a.•- r 0O e> wu 0)'uro r >'O alc - - L 0 0 4 C L T 0 - a) L L O < 4- _ N 'C 'r 1- 0 a-' 4 30 0 F- V O 10 C of this Ordinance Rehabilitation Q 1 V Little Canada Planning Commission 8 July 1986 Page Three This amendment is drafted in ordinance form in Exhibit A. The ordinance amend- ment is a policy decision left to the City. In review of the amendment, the City should assess the need for such facilities and determine,jf the. conditional use concept is appropriate. The amendment is just a draft and left to the scrutiny of Planning Commission and City Council for review and any necessary alterations. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: If the City approves the zoning amendment, North Suburban DAC requests considera- tion of their CUP for a rehabilitation center at 2940 Rice Street. Licensing. North Suburban is a private, nonprofit ,rehabilitation facility that is licensed with the State of Minnesota. The license must be renewed annually and the state conducts periodical inspections of all rehabilitation centers. Ramsey County contracts with North Suburban DAC to provide their vocational training service. No Overnight Facilities. The North Suburban DAC operational hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Facility patrons are at the site between 12 noon to 3:30 p.m. Patrons are delivered to the site by means of three school buses. The operational hours are compatible with the bingo hall which starts operation at 6:15 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. These varying hours of operation allow for a shared parking arrangement between the two uses. Parking. The DAC will have a facility of approximately 20 instructors and administration. Patrons to the site are delivered by three school buses. The bingo hall provides 277 parking stalls which can be jointly used by the two uses because the varying operating hours will not create any parking overlap or conflicts. Proximity to Arterial. The site fronts on Rice Street which is an arterial street in Little Canada. The proposed facility is not anticipated to cause traffic capacity for Rice Street. Signing. Prior to issuing a sign permit, a site signage plan should be submitted for plan review and approval. Compatibility. The rehabilitation center will be training mentally retarded adults vocational skills. As such, it is important to create an environment that resembles real job conditions. In this sense, it benefits the facility to be located in commercial and light industrial areas. The facility itself will not negatively impact the adjacent land uses. 19 Little Canada Planning Commission • 8 July 1986 Page Four RECOMMENDATION The staff has prepared a draft ordinance for City consideration and modification if necessary. The acceptability of the proposed amendment is•16ft to the City's discretion. If the City feels the amendment is appropriate and adopts the amend- ment, then we would recommend approval of the North Suburban DAC conditional use permit. cc: Joseph Chlebeck Thomas Sweeney 2C EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LITTLE CANADA ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW REHABILITATION CENTERS AS CONDITIONAL USES IN B -3, B -W, AND I -1 ZONING DISTRICTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Municipal Code of Little Canada, Section 902 is hereby amended by adding the following: 121.2 Rehabilitation Center: A state licensed facility that offers vocational and physical training to mentally or physically disabled people. Section 2. The Municipal Code of Little Canada, Section 912.040 is hereby amended by adding the following: 912.040. Conditional Uses. (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 921 of this Ordinance.) E. Rehabilitation Centers 1. All rehabilitation centers must have an active license from the Minnesota Department of Welfare. 2. No overnight facilities are provided for the patron served. Patrons are delivered and removed daily. 3. Adequate off- street parking and access is provided in in compliance with Section 90.3.'050 of this Ordinance. 4. The site and related parking and service shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. 5. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 903.110 of this Ordinance. 6. The provisions of Section 921.010, C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Section 3. The Municipal Code of Little Canada, Section 913.040 is hereby amended by adding the following: 21 913.040 Conditional Uses. (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 921 of this Ordinance.) E. Rehabilitation Centers 1. All rehabilitation centers must have an .active license from the Minnesota Department of Welfare. 2. No overnight facilities are provided for the patron served. Patrons are delivered and removed daily. 3. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided in in compliance with Section 903.050 of this Ordinance. 4. The site and related parking and service shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. 5. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in dompliance with Section 903.110 of this Ordinance. 6. The provisions of Section 921.010, C of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from its date of passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Little Canada this day of 1986 Joseph Chlebeck, Clerk /Treasurer Michael Fahey, Mayor Ayes - Nays - 24; PROPOSAL: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: PLANNING COMMISSION: PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUD AND CUP Conditional use permit for a rehabilitation center. 2940 Rice Street 53- 00600 - 030 -44 06- 29- 22 -23- 0008 -2 UNPLATTED LANDS N 200 FT OF W 483 FT OF S 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN LOT 6, BLOCK 29, RANGE 22 North Suburban Development Achievement Center, Inc. The Planning Commission will discuss this matter at their meeting on July 10, 1986 beginning at 7:30 p.m. at the City Center. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on the above matter on July 23, 1986 beginning at 7:50 .m, at the City Center. All persons desiring to be heard with reference to this matter will be heard during this hearing. Joseph G. Chlebeck Clerk Norman Zimmerman 2917 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Wm Klein 2925 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Michael Wiome 2935 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 May Beery 2941 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Michael Scroggins 2963 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Gail Whitmer 160 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Howard Lee 171 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Dave Olson 184 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Zekeriya & Tulun Yargici 1219 Oakcrest Avenue St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0019 Carl Buechler & Raymond A Long & Dennis Nelson 2954 Rice Street No. St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0018 Charles Weber 2962 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06 -29- 22-23 -0004 Thomas Short 2940 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0007 MAILING LIST REHABILITATION CENTER JULY 23, 1986 Frank Trobec et al 2968 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0003 The Market Place 2900 Rice Street #380 St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0020 The Market Place C/O Morgan Whitney 430 Oak Grove St. #203 Mpls., MN 55403 06- 29 -22 -23 -0020 Donald Albrecht 2957 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Bernard Schuhwerck Jr. 2971 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Larry Blant 168 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Bruce Kliese 176 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Stanley Gray 192 Maple Lane Roseville, MN 55113 Johnson Rice Street Complex C/O Mr. Greg Johnson 1219 Everette St. So. Stillwater, MN 55082 06- 29 -22 -23 -0017 Stanley & Geri Jakubowski 685 Heinel Drive St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -23 -0016 24 1IIIIIIIII I11IIIII 2 B ul ti I III lI ll H I�I N o'S2 � n 1111111 .r•aawe of Jv��V 111111111111r 2fr .1o.on 1 e w w sn NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REZONE FROM IP TO R1 DISTRICT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF IP DISTRICT Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota on Wednesday, July 23, 986 at 8:00 .m in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at e ana a Road in said City. The Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at their meeting on July 10, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center. All persons with reference to this matter will be given an opportunity to be heard during this hearing. PROPOSAL: Rezone from IP to R1 District the east 180 feet of the following described parcels. APPLICANT: The City of Little Canada. UNPLATTED LANDS S 295 FT OF FOL THE PART E OF CENTERVILLE RD OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 6 AND SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 UNPLATTED LANDS S 528 FT OF N 1327 26/100 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO HWY AND RD) IN SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 UNPLATTED LANDS S 132 FT OF N 1459 26/100 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 NADEAU ADDITION LOTS 1 -9, 27, AND OUTLOTS A &B UNPLATTED LANDS W 317 FT OF N 350 FT OF FOL: N 26 ACRES OF A TRACT DESCRIBED AS E 297 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 6 AND W 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 UNPLATTED LANDS PART OF N 799 26/100 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 ELY OF CENTERVILLE RD AND SLY OF L BEG ON E L OF AND 486 1 /10 FT FROM NE COR OF SD 1/4 1/4 TH W PAR WITH N L OF SD 1/4 1/4 978 FT TH AT ANGLE OF 43 DEG 52 MIN TO R TO ELY L OF SD RD BEING SUBJ TO TH 290 DITCH AND PIPE L ESMTS ALL IN SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 oseph G. Chlebeck Clerk 26 Anita Torala et al 469 LaBore Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -31 -0013 Aloys E. Willenbring & Mary L. Willenbring 556 Bellwood Avenue E. St. Paul, MN 55117 05 -29- 22-31 -0014 Harold & Shirley Degnan 652 Berwood Avenue St. Paul, MN 55110 05- 29 -22 -31 -0010 Vernon Petersen et al 2857 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -31 -0011 Peter Tierney et al 2851 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -31 -0012 B. W. Peterson et al 2875 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -31 -0009 Gregory & Connie Roberge 476 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0049 Jerome & Kathryn Mailand 2986 Desoto Street St, Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0046 Michael Gallagher & Diane Gallagher 466 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0047 Robert & Theresa Vitali 470 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0048 MAILING LIST IP DISTRICT JULY 23, 1986 State of Minnesota Trust Exempt 109 Courthouse St. Paul, MN 55102 05- 29 -22 -24 -0044 American Home & Construction, Inc. 2985 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0045 Frank Costa et al 2939 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0041 Clifford Wickman 2972 Desoto Street St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0042 R. L. Thunhorst et al 2885 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0036 Adrian Grose et al 2895 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0035 Fred & Loraine Plessel 490 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0028 Summit National Bk of St. Paul 205 Aurora Avenue St. Paul, MN 55103 05- 29 -22 -24 -0029 David Wright 2985 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -24 -0029 Clarence Bruhn et al 2977 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22- 24-0030 27 Donna Mary Nadeau /Fee 1538 Montalban Drive San Jose, CA 95120 05- 29 -22 -22 -0004 Owen Hyland 3,2o- /H A Gt.rc Coon Rapids, MN 55433 05- 29 -22 -22 -0004 05- 29 -22 -22 -0005 Anna Nadeau /Fee 15438 Lone Hill Road Los Gatos, CA 95030 05- 29 -22 -22 -0005 P. DuCharme et al 2875 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -41 -0009 Richard & Carol DuCharme 2849 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -41 -0024 Donald Gagne, Dianne Rice, Marjorie Grape, John Gagne, & Mary Gagne 2857 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -41 -0010 Violet Ratley 2857 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -41 -0010 William Stenger 3032 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -11 -0008 Jennie Costa & Antionette Costa 3030 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -11 -0010 Norman DuPre Jr, 3495 Norman Avenue No Stillwater, MN 55082 06- 29 -22 -11 -0011 Myers Frattalone et al 2939 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -11 -0013 Stephen Hallgren 3005 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0010 Donald & Norma Rush 3003 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0011 Francis McLellan 2979 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0012 Douglas & Nancy DuFrene 2973 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0013 Michael & Phyllis Valento 2959 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0014 Raymond Carle Sr. 2947 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55110 06- 29 -22 -14 -0015 Russell & Elaine Valentine 2921 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0018 Roger Reiter et al 2905 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0019 Roger Reiter et al 4279 Highland Drive St. Paul, MN 55112 06- 29 -22 -14 -0019 Thomas DuCharme 2885 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -14 -0020 28 George Heinel Jr. & Edna Heinel 3036 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0032 Douglas & Mary Wilson 3034 Desoto Street St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0029 Edward Busse 3034 Desoto Street St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0030 Adele Hanson 165 McKnight Road #308 St. Paul, MN 55119 05- 29 -22 -21 -0025 Adele Hanson 3001 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0025 Angelo & Mabel Scalze 469 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0027 David Abbott & Joseph Flood 475 Allen Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0026 Richard Heinel et al 3007 Vanderbie Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -21 -0024 Richard S. Richards 510 E. Co. Rd. D St. Paul, MN 55110 05- 29 -22 -21 -0017 Montreal Court Apts. 396 LaBore Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -32 -0001 29 Thomas Management 8631 Chalet Road Bloomington, MN 55437 05- 29 -22 -32 -0001 David & Pitrina Frattalone 562 Owasso Blvd. So. St. Paul, MN 55113 05- 29 -22 -23 -0007 J. R. & Donald & James Sweitzer as Trustees 777 Raymond Avenue St. Paul, MN 55114 05- 29 -22 -23 -0004 Patrick, Anthony, Joseph, Sam, & Eugene Fasciana et al 2901 Condit Street St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -23 -0005 Florence Bibeau 2910 Centerville Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -23 -0006 Mariano Frattalone 1422 Schletti Street St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -23 -0001 City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Road St. Paul, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -23 -0002 Pasquale Frattalone 450 Co. Rd. D East St. Paul, MN 55110 05- 29 -22 -22 -0001 Gardner Bros. Const. Inc. 2289 Co. Rd. .J Mpls., MN 55432 05- 29 -22 -22 -0002 Paul D Kelly C/0 Kelco Industries Inc. 6420 Zane Avenue No. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 05- 29 -22 -22 -0003 H 3 5 E - 694 3 .., 3 , • N N . , tl 3 3 it.. --N" , i . --- t 0 ..., 3 N, • : \ , N --- ‘-' - B \NNLif ..... —.. -...-- 1 ' ‘34.7■AA, 2.,5 7'""""•—•-'. c.L.: It? 700 '"- — -'—..---A-o-ti .) (.:11L. ■., , ii : ="1 . IS /Conr Le— • IL••••••••• .... •■••••••••• . •P • 9 1 7 .... ... 1 1 . /4. • ,,.., :I 0 , A v .......w..... ..... c; 1 .... ,......, .... j...00..._1,. .. a "LI c74 • - • 'LL' • Ayr •■. • . c• 30a, . (Oil 3 , 8 I?" —...r .4.2_LoEl r r ....._ t 3, 3 I 9.00c x.. 4 _s I , 101.1• ii J V37'1.0 3 98 ... Mc,. \..) . c 5 . , 0 7+ tt d_ /.; 13 34 3,5 3 19 •-•- . Ii"... Sf . iilil 41 t S J.18, / 9)1,7 7 ( i'., . (.33,0.7.9P A . .3 24he) 7 ol, CS. 91 ...- <e" . 010.447 • . ............................... 1 )19., (v 46') '' )244'C) 651377 T.; B -92'." , 0 13!0.t . . I - 1 CO ‘4^•!.1 I, 324,o) • li".. 0 130_7.517 1 .e • A-. I— Et 4' . 1 ( CA07 AC) 0 03..c. .1 ÷.--, 27 . •\ ramc0-.0.- ........ 4.—■...—..........., . : 1" . . • * ts AC ' 75.5e) i 0311‘.6, . 7; IL---• ^--I • 1 " .... .. • —4,r -- .....-.. T..1.1 r.- . " 1.00 .• Morrtitep4- 310 _ 23 • - 5 17 (3(: lo ' io, t•io. • ir, • oe, 12 ti. 11-1) in ALLAN ...177,71.727 ;•' • • 2 „. Li Cur • (AI 1 31 2 1 i 30 &X 52 I .0, (i3) I o B.5 av (4e) 3 • 27 3 8 ?.. !? / I- —/----- •__.) I 10 / I i Y Z4 II .9. I I / r 2-3 1 12 28 • 17. RA, , 4 :•( A • , 'cc 20 C3 PLANNING REPORT northwest Essocis-ted TO: Little Canada Planning Commission CO'ThS Itwts, HC. Nigadvk) JUL 8 1986 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: 7 July 1986 RE: Development District lit Rezoning FILE NO: 758.09 - 86.22 BACKGROUND The "I -P ", Industrial Park Zoning District between Centerville Road and DeSoto Avenue has received much planning attention in recent years. The Little Canada Development District Plan 1986 identifies this area as Development District #1. The following planning recommendations were made for the future land use develop- ment for this development district: "The Comprehensive Plan also identified District 1 as a planning district, and defined in an area conceptual plan that the site is most suitable for warehousing /industrial development with some medium density residential development along the district's eastern border due to site suitability restrictions. The medium density residential area is intended to serve as a transitional land use between the new industrial development and the existing single family neighborhoods to the east." Upon further review of this development district, the City Council determined that medium density residential use proposed along DeSoto Avenue when developed would not offer the desirable buffer between the industrial uses in the park and the existing single family homes to the east. What is being suggested instead of the medium density residential uses is single family lots which will front on DeSoto (see Exhibit A). Exhibit A shows a conceptual single family layout that is con- sistent with the R -1 zoning district and the single family lots to the east. The lots are designed with a 200 foot lot depth to provide additional rear yard area for screening and setback from future residential development. This proposed land use change is consistent with the following comprehensive plan policies which state: 31 4820 minneronKa blvd., sre 200, minn,. f 55416 (612) 925 -9420 Little Canada Planning Commission 7 July 1986 Page Two • Accomplish transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative (economic, social or physical) impact on adjoining developments. • Wherever possible, ensure that changes in types of land use occur either at center, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders, or areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. RECOMMENDATION The R -1 rezoning will serve to implement the City's desired land use patterns by using single family residential uses as a buffer area between the existing uses and future industrial development. We would recommend that if the City chooses to rezone the property to R -1, a subse- quent comprehensive plan amendment be processed to ensure consistency between the zoning and land use plan. northwest Essocicted consultants, inc. JUL 8 1986 CITY OF PLANNING REPORT LITTLE CANADA TO: Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission FROM: David Licht DATE: 7 July 1986 RE: Little Canada - Collova Lot Split FILE NO: 758.09 - 86.21 BACKGROUND A request for a simple subdivision has been filed by the Collovas to resubdivide and reconfigure three existing lots along McMenemy Road. The resubdivision will result only in a change of lot lines with no additional lots being created. CASE ANALYSIS The property in question is zoned R -1 which requires 10,000 square foot interior lots with a minimum of 75 feet frontage. Within the existing division, one of the lots is presently 50.4 feet. The balance of the two lots exceed ordinance minimums. The proposed configuration will result in three properties which all exceed front- age requirements. Area also will be far in excess of the 10,000 square foot require- ment. An issue to be addressed by the City Engineer is the need for lot line and drainage/ utility easements. According to Mr. Chlebeck, however, such easements will likely be required. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the fact that this resubdivision is simply a reconfiguration of lot lines and this revised layout will eliminate one lot with substandard frontage and result in all conforming properties, we recommend approval of the request. This approval is contingent upon the Engineer's determination of need for lot line drainage and utility easements and formal certificate of survey being prepared, accurately defining the new lots. cc: Joseph Chlebeck, Don Carley, John Palacio, Tom Sweeney 4820 minnetonka blvd., Ste 200, minnea3olis, mn 33 -9420 14.• D I, 1 1 0 1 1 ,e., I� (5 4 1 3 it 1 1 1 (le. 1/ I I @-') (la, , � c I \:,7) SE 'Z" 7. PLACE 002-t, 0) 2 ,. 37 I (2 2) ?33 B' 10 z L j (ooz f (3>z1) , 2!`Lt_ 4 — P _ -, 202 1.2 (Trig IN. t/: o (3u ~(i (3 :� 53. I "77 4v I 191. r :01 1 .9nr -“e G3 ••t', Sept .e. 5.15 103 103. (15 (Z3) X31 (31) (30': ; 1 (.90 N 8 83 Qc 2 U, JL) 3 t. Fnow >"`].04 f I t i fl (z5 `S Z.14. •r ° I .vim. 2 .:1 59 -.. r :(9.100,-) .. '7'7'. ` i 49 ) ..� e . 1s51 1 2 z Q ss•1 1 .I•', i� - - 4 J , j0 '(4)) •I 341 ( 1 ' I.953c I f' ;o. ,,l o ' 7, w `. ' U.d �N z m o� r` _1 1, X V .� z v. n ;5¢, ao Cr �� s 11 90J1 e113 > 17, r ,/ /01-1,1) t 8) y •• /) C •o, ,+ D e- -56 it:"... h2. 145 t ' 1 •> u• 1 100 I ..7.1 1 .J0 I we• T (t1 2),,,I, I I P e .+ :1 6,) I d V boo) 00 J 5-1 0 • rt 0 4 35 - r 3: ij (3 -9; 5'1 .36 +c (38) JJ 13,943' f -g7'. 59ec. . w • f o (4.1 33 L• 3 c 12 ..5 �'1 1 I to 1� f nt • '1 s 4 1 rt. li I l.. t .: j1 v E.)( TANT -- • (930x CITY CEMETERY ST. JOHN'S ,c 34 35 36 I 37 1 1 O et O l0 S 0 July 7, 1986 northwest 2ssoci2ted co RIETEaUl JUL 8 1986 Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Larson 1018 Sinis Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RE: Little Canada - Larson Subdivision File No: 758.09 - 86.20 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Larson: nsultmnts, inc. Attached please find a copy of our office's report on your requested subdivision. Due to time limitations, we were forced to issue the report without all necessary information on the size of land being added to your lot. I have attempted to reach you by phone on this matter, but to date have been unsuccessful. I would, as a consequence, appreciate your calling me at the earliest opportunity to clarify this matter. If at all possible, I would like to have this information prior to the Planning Commission meeting on Thursday night. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIAT David R. Licht, AICP President DRL /nd cc: Joseph Chlebeck 38 482.0 minnetonka blvd., ste. 200, minneaDolis, mn 53tf16 (612) 925 -9420 PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: northwest 2ssociEted co Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission, David R. Licht DATE: 7 July 1986 s It8nts, inc. RE: Little Canada - Larson Resubdivision (Twin Lake Shores Plat) FILE NO: 758.09 - 86.20 BACKGROUND Due to the position of the dwelling on Lot 2 along and partially over the lot line, the applicants are requesting a resubdivision to add property to their lot to make the side yard setback conforming. CASE ANALYSIS The property in question is R -1, plus shoreland recreational development zoned. As such, 20,000 square foot lot miniums are required. From the information available, it is not possible to calculate area. The general indication, however, is that both lots are conforming and will continue to be so following resubdivision. As this land was created prior to shoreland zoning, the lots are also considered acceptable. Also unclear at this time is the width of the land to be added to Lot 2. At minimum, 11.7 feet are required to bring the existing dwelling into compliance. It is assumed that this amount or more is being added. Issues which require the City Engineer's attention are whether or not existing drainage and utility easements exist and whether they are needed in the future. If lot drainage and utility easements presently exist, they will have to go through a vacation process. RECOMMENDATION Our review indicates that the requested subdivision will not result in the establish- ment of substandard parcels. As a consequence, we recommend approval of the request. This recommendation is, however, contingent upon: 39 4820 minneronka blvd., ste 200, minneapol (612) 925 -9420 Little Canada Mayor and City Council Little Canada Planning Commission 7 July 1986 Page Two 1. The applicant providing a certificate of survey accurately reflecting the newly defined lots and the setback of the existing dwelling. 2. A determination by the City Engineer as to whether drainage and utility easements exist and need to be vacated and whether lot line drainage and utility easements are required. cc: Joseph Chlebeck Don Carley John Palacio Tom Sweeney Daniel and Helen Larson 40 O z,7 k' 4' C r- 0 o H a) Or a r J _ S2 1 1 1 if ty. Y1 API U I � • • 7J ' 1. -14:J n Vl /l IN N 0 "e n r r` i" P NY . \j H N t y a, B ?A. -i: ,. .. �'F[CNZ.. 'C. ,, • _T..1 r -- _la- Tom— , =JS _7 v 6 {./ r m �; +r.• Ir /1� m ,} Iji a AS 9 "552C c1C AI-2414i • fife /Oa�V / 41 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For: Can Lcusoo notes Iron ngs Are Assumed P 20 X50.8 751/751/11N/ zso2250226' 3'20.37" LA n ryl Lot 1, Block 1, TWIN LAKE SHORES, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 42 MEMORANDUM northwest associated consultants, inc. cir2117Q JUL 17 1986 CITY OF TO: Little Canada Mayo/ and City Council LITTLE CANADA FROM: David Licht ,\ DATE: 16 July 1986 RE: FILE NO: Little Canada - Little Canada Road Office Building TIF (Kennedy) 758.09 - 86.23 On this date I met with Mike Kennedy and conveyed to him our finding,: that the acquisition of the adjoining single family property by the City through tax increment financing cannot be accomplished with the construction of a 6,000 square foot office building. An 8,000 square foot office would, however, support the suggested neighboring property purchase and relocation based upon our preliminary estimates. Mr. Kennedy continues to content that the larger sized structure will be more expensive beyond the proportionate, direct square foot building costs. I have as a consequence requested that he provide formal documentation of such expenses so that the Council can evaluate the situation from a factual basis. Relative to the project from a general perspective, our office believes that several basic conclusions can be drawn. First, redevelopment of the area into office use would appear positive. The present exposure to traffic does not present a highly desirable single family living area. This situation is furthered by the present existance of commercial to the south of Little Canada Road. The Kennedy proposal, in general terms is therefore seen as an oppor- tunity to improve the area. The second observation is that if the area is to redevelop with a non - residential use, isolated pockets of inconsistent and incompatible land use should not be permitted. Such a position would suggest that the neighboring residence must definitely be included as part of the project. 43 4820 minnetonka blvd., ste. 200, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 1 Little Canada Mayor and City Council 16 July 1986 Page Two Given the above considerations, plus the very negative real estate development implications of the new federal tax law, the City will have to make a policy determination as to whether developer assistance, to the full extent possible, achieves positive long range benefit to the community and area in question. As a point of fact, we would anticipate that should the present Kennedy proposal not be realized in some fashion or another at this time, the likelihood of accomplishing a redevelopment of this area probably will be lost for a long period of time. I will be available to discuss this matter further at your meeting on 23 July. cc: Joseph Chlebeck Tom Sweeney 44 f MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: BACKGROUND As per your request, we have projected the tax increment support from the proposed Kennedy Office Building at 311 Little Canada Road. There are two sets of projections. The first set is for the 6,000 square foot office building proposed, the second reflects a larger 8,000 square foot office building. northwest Essoc1Eted co Little Canada Mayor and City Council Alan Brixius /David Licht 16 July 1986 Little Canada Road Office TIF 758.14 - 86.23 nsult2nts, inc. pgE1M JUL 17 1986 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA EXPENSES The following. rough TIF budget has been prepared for the Little Canada Office Build- ing to be located at the corner of Centerville Road and Little Canada Road. The Little Canada City Council suggested that the parcel to the north at 2714 Centerville Road be included in the present project site. The site to the north is approximately 13,500 square feet in area and contains a single family house. The following costs would be incurred in acquiring and preparing this site for the development of additional office space. Project Costs: Land Acquisition Demolition Relocation Benefits $62,000 5,000 20,000 $87,000 The expenses are rough estimates of costs. Acquisition will require a property appraisal, demolition of the home may differ from the estimate, and the projected expenses do not include any site improvement costs such as filling or grading. 45 4820 min netonka blvd., ste. 200, minneapolis, mn 55416 1612) 925 -9420 10 July 1J00 • cP9ge'Two REVENUES Due to the redevelopment of two single family lots, a redevelopment district can be established over the project site, if 70% of the land parcels involved contain structures that are deteriorated or substandard and are in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment. The proposed redevelopment sites actually consist of five lots, only two of which contain development. The project site consists of D, E, F, G, and H of Registered Survey No. 68. As such, the area does not currently meet the 70% requirement for the redevelopment district. There exists two options to bring the project site into compliance with the 70% requirement: Option #1 Designate the redevelopment district over only lots E and G of the project site. These lots contain the single family homes that are to be redeveloped. Under this arrangement, 100% of the lots would qualify for redevelopment. All new building redevelopment must then occur on these two lots. The accessory parking could be constructed on the balance of the lots. Option #1 limits the development flexibility of the site and would not result in a single building site for the project which will complicate construction and property layouts. Option #2 Prior to establishing the redevelopment district, the lots in the project site could be consolidated into two parcels. After the lot consolidation both parcels would qualify for a redevelopment district. Option #2 is consistent with the City's requirement to have all development on a single parcel. This option enlarges the development site to allow for greater flexibility for site design. If the project site is qualified as a redevelopment district, the bonding term for the project could be as long as 25 years. The following projections reflect various redevelopment bonding terms. 46 '16 July 1986 Page Three The tax increment parcel would include Lots D, G, and H of Registered Land Survey No. 68. This parcel contains approximately 19,500 square feet of area and is presently proposed to support an 6,000 square foot office building. The estimated construction cost of the building is $45.00 per square foot of floor area. The following calculations show tax increment projections based on two land values. The first projections are based on the assessor's estimated market value, the second set of projections reflect a current land acquisition cost of approximately $1.36 per square foot. The acquisition cost was calculated based on the applicant's land acquisition cost of $80,000 minus an estimated $55,000 value of the house existing on the parcel. TAX INCREMENT GENERATION - 6,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE Low High Value Value Market Values: Land $15,400 Building 270,000 $285,400 Assessed Value x.43 Mil Rate 122.022 Tax Generation Minus Frozen Base Credit 5% for Debt Coverage Tax Available for TIE $122,722 x.122022 $14,975 -1,342 $25,000 270,000 $295,000 x.43 $126,850 x.122022 $15,478 -1,342 $13,633 $14,136 682 706 $12,951 $13,430 It should be noted that these calculations reflect a 43% assessed value ratio. If this is the applicant's only commercial property or highest valued commercial property in Ramsey County, the applicant may choose the special commercial assessment rate of 28% of the first $60,000 of market value and 43% of the balance of market value. BOND SIZE The bond size is being calculated at a 9% interest rate to provide a conservative projection of what project costs can be supported. A lower interest rate may be available at time of bond sale. 47 ,16 July 1986 Page Four Tax Available for TIF Maximum Bond Size (9% Interest Rate) Low Value 15 Years 20 Years 25 Years $ 12,951 $ 12,951 $ 12,951 92,000 110,000 124,000 Capitalized Interest 20,700 (9% for 2.5 Years) $ 71,300 Administration 10% of Project Cost 8,700 Bond Discount 2% Bond Printing and Registration PROJECT SUPPORT 1,840 1,000 $ 59,760 24,750 27,900 15 Years $ 13,430 97,000 21,825 High Value 20 Years $ 13,430 116,000 25 Years $ 13,430 128.000 26,100 28,800 $ 85,250 $ 96,100 $ 75,175 $ 89,900 8,700 8,700 8,700 8,700 2,200 2,480 1,940 - 2,320 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ 73,350 $ 83,920 $ 63,535 $ 77,880 $ 99,200 8,700 2,560 1.000 $ 86,940 The TIF projection indicates that the proposed 6,000 square foot building may produce sufficient taxes to support the acquisition and relocation costs of land at 2714 Centerville Road only with a higher land value and a 25 year bonding period. The following projections show the TIF generation and supportable bond with an 8,000 square foot building. TAX INCREMENT GENERATION - 8,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE Market Values: Land Buildings Assessed Value Mil .Rate 122.022 Tax Generation Minus Frozen Base Credit 5% for Debt Coverage Tax Available for TIF Low High Value Value $ 15,400 360,000 $375,400 x.43 161,422 x.122022 19,697 -1,324 18,373 -918 $17,455 48 $ 25,000 360,000 $385,000 x.43 165,550 x.122022 20,200 -1,342 18,858 -943 $17,915 16 July 1986 ff„ Page Five Tax Available for TIF Maximum Bond Sale (9% Interest Rate) Capitalized Interest 27,900 (9% for 2.5 Years) 15 Years $ 17,455 124,000 Administration 10% Bond Discount 2% Bond Printing and Registration 96,100 8,700 2,500 1,000 PROJECT SUPPORT $ 83,900 Low Value 20 Years $ 17,455 148,000 25 Years $ 17,455 167,000 33,300 37,575 114,700 8,700 3,000 1,000 $.102,000 129,425 8,700 3,400 1,000 $116,325 15 Years $ 17,915 127,000 28,575 98,425 8,700 2,600 1,000 $ 86,125 High Value 20 Years $ 17,915 152,000 25 Years $ 17,915 171,000 34,200 38,500 117,800 8,700, 3,100. 1,000 132,500 8,700 3,500 1,000 $105,000 $119,300 CONCLUSION The 8,000 square foot building appears to be capable of producing sufficient tax increment to make the project work with a 20 year bonding period. 49 • SSOCIATES, IN a:.. Consulting Engineers —land Surveyors Mr. Frank Frattalone 3066 Spruce St. Little Canada, Minn. 55117 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 4843301 RE: Spruce St. Cn:OF LITTLE CANADA July 17, 1986 Dear Mr. Frattalone: We refer to our letter to you on July 10, 1986 regarding the condition of Spruce St. To date nothing has been done. It appears that the upper layer of bituminous is splitting apart and is not adhering to the lower layer. Your prompt attention is requested. Yours truly, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice Pres DOC:sjl "CC: City Clerk- City of Little Canada Buck Blacktop - 32 S. Owasso Blvd- Little Canada, Minn. 50 ASSOCIATES, IN7�, �;�, Inq Whit 4ri4nd.5yryay4rK Mr. Frank Frattalone 3066 Spruce St. Little Canada, Minn. Dear Mr. Frattalone: 55117 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484-3301 JU4 1s 1988 - CITY OF LITTLE LE CANADA July 17, 1986 RE: Round Lake Overlook We have recently inspected the apron on the storm sewer outlet off of Jessica Court and find that it is moving downhill away from the storm which was extend. . This occurred because the rods have:not been replaced. Your? ompt action G7,2( Yours truly, remedy this is requested. MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice Pres. DOC:sj1 51 • SSOCIATES, IN N `k Consulting Engineers -Lond Surveyor..., Mr. Frank Frattalone 3066 Spruce St. Little Canada, Minn. Dear Mr. Frattalone: 55/17 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 4843301 July 17, 1986 RE: Storm Sewer Thunder Bay Addition As you know from our phone conversation the storm sewer following Ditch 7B in Thunder Bay Addition has been constructed on a reverse grade and not according to plan. This sewer must be relaid before the City begins work on its protion of the storm sewer in the Thunder Bay Addition. Yours truly, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice Pres. DOC:sj1 -CC: City Clerk -City of Little Canada 52 Mr. Tim Tolaas Ramsey County Public Works 3377 Rice St. St. Paul, Minn. 55126 Dear Mr. Tolaas: 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484 -3301 JUL CITY OF LITTLE CANADA July 17, 1986 RE: County Road "B2" As a result of our meeting on July 14, 1986 concerning the drainage on County Road "52 ", I am writing this letter to point out the concern of the City Council of Little Canada in regard to the drainage on the North side of the street. The drainage pattern has been altered as a result of the interceptor construction. We understand that final-acceptance has not yet been made. The Council would like to see':the infromation you have regard elevations of ditches and culverts on the North side of the street in the - location we looked at West of Greenbrier Circle. Yours truly, MILNER W. CARLEYASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P. Vice Pres. DOC:sjl CC: City Clerk -City Little Canada MWCC- Ray Payne- 350 Metro Square Bldg- St. Paul,,. Minn. 55101 53 Mr. Dale Kingsbury 711 Keller Parkway - Little Canada, Minn. 55117 Dear Mr, Kingsbury: 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484 -3301 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA July 17, 1986 RE: Drainage - Labore Road We met with Mr. Tim Tolaas of Ramsey County on Monday, July 14 to discuss several issues:; - concerning drainage on County Roads: One of these items was the catch basins on Labore Road in front of your property. Mr. Tolaas agreed to consult with his staff the various alternatives that could be considered to.increase the flow through the catch basins. When'we receive word, we will inform you immediately. - Yours truly, MILNER W, CARLEY _CIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice Pres. - DOC:sjl- CC: City Clerk -City of Little Canada -515 E. Little Canada Rd. -- Tim Tolaas-Ramsey - County.- 1”.77;.Rice.St:f -St, Paul; MEron. 54 LASSOCIATES, ING't, ConsuIfrng Engineers —land Surveyors City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. Little Canada, Minn. 55117 Dear Council Members: 500 West Highway 96 St, Paul, Minnesota 55112 484 -3301 Jui- 17 1986 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA July 17, 1986 RE: Edgerton Storm Sewer On July 14 we met with Ramsey County Representative, Tim Tolaas,to look at various drainage problems which involve the County and were discussed at the July 9 meeting. We inspected the situation on Edgerton from Sunrise North where Mr. Tuerk lines and several more homes are to be built. The immediate problem is the fact that a high pressure natural gas main has been exposed by ditching done by the County, but never completed because of the gas main. A short section of flexible plastic culvert has been placed in front of the Tuerk home but would be difficult or impossible to continue because of the gas main and power poles. We would recommend that a proper storm sewer be constructed in the bike path on Edgerton. The cost would be shared with the City, County and Northern States Power Co. Yours truly, MILN�� Do'ia1 d 0. W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. DOC:sj1 ' • arley, P.E.A Vice Pres. CC: Tim Tolaas- Ramsey Co. - 3377 Rice St. - St. Paul, Minn. 55126 Northern States Power - 1700 E. County Road "E" -White Bear Lake, MN SSOCIATES, INrr Consulting Engineers— land Surveyors;; City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. Little Canada, Minn. 55117 Dear Council Members: p2f1W-1 JUL 17 1986 CITY OF 500 West Highway 96 LITTLE CANADA St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484-3301 RE: Canabury Pond July 17, 1986 Since receiving the petition from Canabury Pond to remedy the high water elevation in the pond, we have considered several alternatives including a public improvement to be done by the City. I met with Ted Glasrud last week and agreed with him that the simplest solution would be to cut an overflow swale on his property . which would eventually flow into Sleepy Hollow and be pumped to Savage Lake. Yours truly, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. d Donald 0. Carley, P.E. Vice Pres. DOC:sj1 CC: Ted Glasrud- 151 E. County Road "B2" - Little Canada, Minn. 55117 Jackie Sorenson - 175 E. Co. Rd. "B2 "- Little Canada, Minn 55117 5 6