Laserfiche WebLink
District 4 - Citizens commented that they would like to keep Bryan and <br />(Cont.) LaBore Roads deadend. <br />District 5 <br />District 6 <br />One citizen expressed concern that some of the property in <br />this planning district was zoned residential and some was <br />zoned commercial. The party felt that the district should be <br />zoned either all residential or all commercial, preferably <br />residential. <br />Another citizen stated that it was his desire that the property <br />already zoned commercial remain commercial. The changing of <br />his property from commercial to residential would cause him to <br />lose a great deal of money. <br />Mr. Nielsen suggested that property in this area could remain <br />both residential and commercial with buffer zones, or there <br />could be RE zoning in the area. <br />Both citizens again stated their views as previously mentioned <br />above. <br />Mr. Ducharme was very concerned that the planner had suggested <br />a neighborhood commercial center on the property that he owns <br />and where he carrys out a truck farming business. The planner <br />assured Mr. Ducharme that this was just a suggestion and in no <br />way stated what was going to be done. <br />There was also concern expressed over Centerville Road being <br />used as a collector. <br />District 7 - Concern was expressed over the industrial zoning of District 7 <br />and its effect on homes in the area. <br />The planner is suggesting that District 7 be zoned as a PUD <br />mid- density housing area. <br />One citizen stated that he did agree with the zoning that the <br />planner suggests. <br />District 8 - There were no questions concerning District 8. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Kathleen Glanzer <br />Recording Secretary <br />019 <br />Page -2- <br />