Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />rEBRUARY 22, 2006 <br />Montreal Courts was informed of the severity of the issue and the <br />frustration thaC the City and Sheriff's Department share in the limited <br />attention thaC the ownership has given to this matter. The Administrator <br />reported that Montreal Courts was informed that the City has been <br />considering enacting a licensing ordinance for multi-family housing to try <br />to address the issue, but would rather work cooperatively with the <br />ownership in resolving the problem. The Administrator felt that the new <br />president of Goldmark Corporation was dancing around the issues. <br />Blesener indicated that the problem comes down to the need for an on-site <br />presence of the Sheriff's Department at Montreal Courts. Goldmark <br />Corporation made no commitments on the issue of security. The <br />Administrator pointed out that some of the other multi-family properties in <br />the City have good on-site management resulting in fewer problems. <br />There has been no stability in the management at Montreal Courts. <br />LaValle expressed concern with generating apart-time job for a Sheriff's <br />Deputy. LaValle felt that the Sheriff's Department should be patrolling <br />the complex more and be more visible. <br />The City Administrator pointed out the high call volume at Montreal <br />Courts, and felt that on-site security was needed. Whether that security is <br />a Sheriff's Deputy or a private security guard was another issue. The <br />Administrator noted the private security guard that does a great job at the <br />Grand Pre' complex. Blesener suggested that the greatest need for <br />security at Montreal Courts was on Friday and Saturday evenings for 6 to <br />8 hours. <br />The Administrator suggested that if Montreal Courts refuses to address the <br />issue, it might be worth it for the City to offer some financial assistance, <br />hire security, and then demonstrate the reduction in the number of calls as <br />a result of on-site security. <br />Blesener pointed out that another meeting will be held next month, at <br />which Montreal Courts is to come back with a proposal. <br />Montour pointed out that Montreal Courts has been dragging their feet on <br />this issue for a long time, and felt it was time to hold them accountable. <br />He also noted that summer is coming, Chus the number of police calls at <br />Montreal Courts will likely increase. The City Administrator indicated <br />that since a security system was installed for access, the number of calls <br />has dropped. He also noted that the Sheriff's Department indicated that <br />the problems are not necessarily from the residents of Montreal Courts, <br />but from acquaintances of people living at the complex. <br />