02-13-1980 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Little Canada Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council 7 February 1980 2. 3. 4. Page Two Building Setbacks. The site plan submitted has shown the structure located at approximately 33 feet from the front property line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 40 foot front yard setback in the 1 -1 District. In discussing this with the applicant, he indicated that it would not be a problem to move the building back to 40 feet in compliance with the ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance requires side yard setbacks of 15 feet. The Site Plan shows 16 feet on the south side of the building, but only six feet on the north side - a situation which will require a variance. In addition, the six feet on the north side will be reduced somewhat if the building is moved back from the street to comply with the front yard requirements. While we typically strongly encourage discretion in approving variances, it is felt that in this case a variance may be warranted. First, the property configuration is somewhat difficult to deal with. While the lot has adequate area, it is long and narrow and tapers at the rear. Further, it is suggested that the intent of yard setback provisions be considered. Setbacks are intended to ensure proper structure organization, prevent over- crowding of structures and provide open space. Since the property to the north is railroad right -of -way and there are no apparent plans to abandon this line, it appears that the potential for another structure to be built directly north is not likely to occur for quite some time. If the side yard variance is approved, the Site Plan should be revised in order that the Building Official has a reference for checking the location of the building on the site. Parking. The existing Zoning Ordinance does not allow parking in front yard areas other than neighborhood business districts. However, this issue has been previously discussed with the City and has been changed in the Zoning Ordinance revision presently under consideration by the City. Also, while the number of spaces shown on the Site Plan is only three, there appears to be adequate room for parking in the rear. Further, Mr. DeBace is pursuing getting permission from NSP to park on their easement. Mr. DeBace has indicated that the front parking /loading area and the driveway back to the end of the building will be blacktopped. Access to the site is provided by a single driveway off of Country Drive. The driveway is located as far from the railroad intersection as possible and is con- sidered acceptable. 9