My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1987 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
04-22-1987 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2013 1:52:57 PM
Creation date
5/7/2013 1:49:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />`larch 23, 1033 <br />Cary Smith 1 <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. Licht stated that any approval at this point would be premature. <br />Licht also stated that he felt a development contract would be needed <br />between Mrs. Corbo and Yr. Smith. The contract will outline everyone's <br />responsibilities in the matter. <br />Mr. Forsberg stated that in a few years, the property will be <br />developed and the City will have to deal with Mr. Smith's 4 inch <br />sewer 1i.ne. <br />Mr. Fahey stated that the Council previously indicated that Mr. Smith <br />would have to put in a sewer line that could be connected to the other <br />property in the area. Also, Mr. Smith would have to pay any future <br />road assessment. <br />Mr. Carley. stated that there was not much difference between the <br />cost: of a 6 inch line and a 4 inch line. <br />Fahey stated he would be in favor of a 4 inch line installed to City <br />standards that would allow for future expansion of the system and <br />Mr. Smith would also have to he agreeable to paying any future <br />road assessments. <br />Mr. Sweeney pointed out that there may be a question of the competence <br />of the property owner. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that she thought this was something that the <br />people were going to work out. Scalze stated that they were to pay <br />for it also. <br />There was a question that because the two proposed lots on the Caplette <br />property appeared on the easement drawn up by the Engineer that this <br />would indicate they were approved lots. The Engineer disagreed with <br />this. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked if Mr. Smith would control the 4 inch sewer line. <br />The Engineer stated that the line would become the property of the <br />City. <br />The City Attorney stated that the easement only indicates the location <br />of the sewer easement and would not have any bearing on the two <br />Caplette lots. <br />Mr. Forsberg expressed concern that the City was allowing a home to <br />be built on an inaccessable lot. Mr. Smith stated that the road is <br />tared to the lot he wants to build on. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the City created the lot and the lot <br />split is already approved. <br />The Attorney asked who will pay for the 4 inch sewer line. Mr. Fahey <br />replied that Ir. Smith will pay for it. <br />Page 112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.