My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-20-06 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
12-20-06 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:34:58 PM
Creation date
4/22/2008 10:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 20, 2006 <br />drainage problems for his property. Gores felt that there had to be a plan <br />in place for the water that leaves those ponds. <br />The City Engineer noted that this is a concept only and no storm water <br />calculations have been done. Storm water ponds are required for water <br />quality treatment. The Engineer noted that the development cannot <br />change existing drainage patterns nor increase run-off from the property. <br />Keis encourage the surrounding property owners to stay involved as this <br />development progresses through the approval process. He pointed out that <br />once the concept moves to Preliminary Plat, the City Engineer will get <br />involved. Keis recommended that property owners keep their voices <br />heard and protect their properties. Blesener noted that once engineering <br />work begins, it may be determined that it is not feasible to place the ponds <br />in the locations shown on the concept. Allan also pointed out that the <br />Watershed will also be involved. <br />There was no one else present from the general public wishing to <br />comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Montour, seconded by Allan, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />The City Planner noted that this is concept review. If the developer <br />significantly changes the concept based on the comments received, the <br />developer can submit another concept or go right to Preliminary Plat <br />review. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2006-12-294 -APPROVING THE CONCEPT <br />REVIEW FOR RICHIE PLACE SUBJECT TO ALL COMMENTS, <br />SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS <br />OF THE CITYPLANNER RELATIVE TO SETBACK FOR LOTS 7, 8, <br />AND 9, AS WELL AS CONNECTIONS TO THE PROPERTIES TO <br />THE EAST AND WEST, AND SUBJECT TO ALL CITY ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (4). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.