Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />May 14, 1987 <br />Wright <br />Lot Split <br />(Cont.) <br />It was noted that the property owners were not informed of the proposal. <br />Timmons was concerned that the Plessel's be notified of Mr. Wright's <br />proposal and the necessity of 20 feet of right -of -way from their <br />property. Timmons noted that the Plessel lot will then become a <br />corner lot. Timmons felt that the matter should be tabled until <br />the next meeting so that the owners are informed of what is happening. <br />Wright felt he was being unjustly held up and that this matter is <br />something the City should have resolved some time ago. <br />Costa pointed out the existing drain tiles in the area. <br />Wright stated that the tiles would be tied into the storm sewer system. <br />Timmons recommended that the Wright property division be tabled until <br />the next Planning Commission meeting and that the Plessel's be notified <br />of the Wright proposal by registered mail with a copy to David Wright <br />as well as the Planning Commission, as well as the Planning Commission <br />being provided with a diagram as to how the Plessel house will sit in <br />relation to the proposed road." <br />Motion seconded by Schweizer. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Carlson Mr. Ronald P. Carlson appeared before the Commission requesting <br />Sideyard approval of a sideyard setback variance for his lot located on <br />Setback Burke Lane. Carlson felt that Nadeau Road would never be extended <br />Variance through this area. <br />The City Planner noted that in April of 1986 the City approved the <br />same variance for Mr. Dukowitz, and the property has now been sold <br />to Mr. Carlson. The Planner recommended that a standard 10 -foot <br />sideyard setback be required in this instance. <br />The Planner also noted that there is a sideyard setback variance <br />for the home located across the street from Mr. Carlson's lot. <br />Timmons recommended that a sideyard setback variance requested by <br />Mr. Ronald P. Carlson for Lot 10, Block 2, Southern Slope Addition <br />be approved requiring a standard 10 foot sideyard setback on the <br />property due to the fact that a sideyard setback variance was approved <br />for Lot 6, Block 1, Southern Slope Addition as well as the fact that <br />it does not appear that Nadeau Road will be extended in the area, <br />and also due to the fact that a similar variance was granted to Mr. <br />Dukowitz for the same property on April 23, 1986. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Herkenhoff. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0 <br />Page 4 <br />