My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-06 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-17-06 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:33:00 PM
Creation date
4/22/2008 10:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTI/S <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 17, 2006 <br />MOIlCOUC pointed out the outdoor storage discussion and suggested ChaC <br />eliminating metal buildings may prohibit property owners from adding on <br />to Their buildings to enclose some of this storage. Keis suggested Chat <br />there were few property owners that would add on to their buildings to <br />enclose outdoor storage. He suggested that perhaps metal should be <br />eliminated from an acceptable building material for principal buildings, <br />but could be used for an accessory building. <br />The City Planner noted that if metal is prohibited, the existing metal <br />buildings would be grandfathered in. Under the City's Code, non- <br />conforming buildings could be expanded by 25%. The City Clerk pointed <br />out recent changes Co State Law relative to non-conforming buildings and <br />uses. While the City can restrict expansions, property owners are allowed <br />to improve, replace, or modify existing non-conforming buildings. Any <br />condition that requires anon-conformity to eventually go away triggers <br />eminent domain to come into play. <br />The City Administrator suggested adding an incentive Co the Code ChaC <br />would result in less outdoor storage and/or beCCer building construction. <br />It was noted that if Rossow redevelops his large parcel, he use metal. IC <br />was noted that Rossow has indicated Chat he would like to eventually <br />redevelop this large parcel with two buildings since he has a pipeline <br />running through the parcel that he would have to work around. <br />Keis stated that the City could grant a variance to allow the two buildings <br />on the parcel, but felt any redevelopment of the site should be with <br />upgraded materials. <br />Duray pointed out that an expansion of anon-conforming building would <br />allow the expansion to be metal as well. The City Planner suggested that <br />the expansion could be up to 25% of the building size in metal. Any <br />expansion that is 26% Co 50% of the original building size would have to <br />be upgraded materials. If the expansion is over 51%, the entire building <br />would have to be broughC into conformance. <br />The City Planner indicated that he would work on this issue of upgrading <br />building materials and eliminating metal in I-1 as well as dealing with the <br />expansion of non-conforming uses. The City Administrator indicated that <br />he would research the use of geopiers to support heavier buildings in Ryan <br />Industrial Park to determine if this is a practical requirement. <br />The City Planner also noted the proposed addition of EFIS Co acceptable <br />building materials in I-1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.