Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />June 22, 1988 <br />AIC <br />Property <br />Agenda <br />Item No. <br />The City Attorney reported that AIC Corporation has made a counter -offer <br />to the City's offer for purchase of a portion of their property in the <br />Centerville Road area. AIC Corporation is proposing that they pay only <br />levied assessments on their property, and the City would be responsible <br />15 for pending assessments. AIC Corporation is also proposing an interest <br />rate higher than that given to other property owners in the area that <br />have entered into agreements with the City for the purchase of their land. <br />The City Clerk reported that there are levied, but deferred, assessments <br />on the AIC property for watermain in the amount of $9,273.51 and there <br />are levied assessments for sanitary sewer with a balance yet to be paid <br />of $3,196.76. The City Clerk reported that there are no pending assessments <br />on the property. <br />Council discussed the matter and felt the same terms and conditions given <br />to other property owners in the area should be extended to AIC Corporation <br />as well. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 88 -6 -256 - OFFERING THE AIC <br />CORPORATION THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR <br />PURCHASE OF THEIR PROPERTY IN THE CENTERVILLE <br />ROAD AREA AS WERE OFFERED OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS <br />IN THE AREA, NAMELY THAT THE LEVIED ASSESSMENTS <br />WOULD BE PAID BY THE SELLER AND THE INTEREST RATE <br />OFFERED WOULD BE EQUAL TO 1% GREATER THAN THE <br />t INTEREST RATE BEING RECEIVED BY THE CITY , ON <br />n <br />&Core -/1on7 ITS OTHER INVESTMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (4) Scalze, Blesener, Fahey, Collova. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 261. <br />Bow & <br />Arrow <br />Permit <br />Edward <br />Inman <br />Agenda <br />Item No. <br />The City Attorney reported that in his opinion if an archery range is set <br />up appropriately with defined areas, the City would incur no liability, <br />however, that does not mean the City would not be named in a lawsuit if <br />one occurred. <br />Scalze pointed out that most other cities do not allow the shooting of <br />bows and arrows within their limits. Scalze did not believe the City <br />16 should issue the bow and arrow permit requested by Mr. Edward Inman. <br />There was no motion put forth by the Council for action on the Inman <br />permit request. <br />Page 25 <br />