Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OCT0131JR 12, 2006 <br />the new brand sign (E02) is 84 square feet. Ringh asked if these two signs <br />are combined if the square footage could be 184 square feet. <br />The City Planner felt the proposal would be more acceptable if the two <br />signs were combined. <br />Knudsen felt that the combination of these signs would still achieve <br />Shurgard's business objectives. <br />The Planning Commission expressed concern about the number of <br />temporary signs at the Shurgard property, and asked if the proper permits <br />have been taken ouC for these signs. Ringh stated that her company was <br />not involved in the temporary signage. The Commission asked that the <br />Code Enforcement Officer inspect the property to ensure that temporary <br />signage is in compliance. <br />The City Planner felt that combination of the two wall signs on the south <br />elevation should be with similar square footage to what is currently there, <br />that is 124 square feet. The Planner indicated that if Che proposal is thus <br />modified, only an administrative approval would be necessary. <br />Ringh felt that this could be worked out. <br />The City Planner noted that the new internal sign (NO1) has no impact to <br />the property. He also recommended that signs N02 and E02 be combined <br />with similar square footage to what currently exists. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Duray recommended approval of the Amendment to PUD allowing <br />additional signage in excess of what has been allowed by the PUD <br />Agreement subject to the combination of signs N02 and E02 into one sign <br />that does not increase over the 125 square feet of signage that would be <br />replaced, and subject to the applicant meeting with the Code Enforcement <br />Officer to review Che total sign plan and ensure that it is acceptable. <br />Motion seconded by Rheaume. <br />Motion carried 7 - 0. <br />