Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JANUARY 12, 2006 <br />entrance to the back room area would be posted restricting access to people <br />aged 21 years and older. <br />Knudsen asked if someone would ID pahons going into the back room. <br />Meyer replied that there would be. She indicated that they are considering <br />purchasing an electronic machine that validates age. Knudsen asked if there <br />would be a person posted at the door ensuring that no one under 21 years of <br />age enters. Meyer reported that there would be. <br />Rheaume asked if patrons would be prevented from taking beer out of the <br />back room. Meyer replied that sales and consumption would be restricted <br />to the back room. <br />Knudsen pointed out that there was a 6-month review for the Alriffi CUP, <br />and suggested that the same review period be utilized for the Meyers. <br />Knudsen fe1C that would be prudent given the 4 a.m. closing time as well as <br />the 3.2 Intoxicating Malt Liquor License. <br />Barraclough recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow <br />billiard/amusement hall as a commercial recreation use in the PUD DistricC <br />subject to the following: <br />0 4 a.m. closing time to be allowed, with closing time to be <br />posted as 2 a.m.; <br />o Alcohol sales and consumption to be restricted to the back <br />room area and sales to cease at 1 a.m.; <br />o The CUP is non-transferable; <br />o A satisfactory six-month review of the CUP. <br />Motion seconded by McGraw. <br />Motion carried 7 - 0. <br />TEXT The City Planner reported that the Shoreland DistricC is an overlay district <br />AMENDMENT to properties within 1,000 feet of a lake. Properties within the Shoreland <br />FOR R-1 District are subject to a 50 foot front yard setback when the property abuts a <br />FRONT YARD Federal State, or County trunk highway, while the front yard setback for the <br />SETBACK Single-Family (R-1) District is 30 feet. The City Planner was unsure of the <br />IN reason for the difference in front yard setback, but speculated that it could <br />SHORELAND be a means of regulating the amount of lot coverage that can occur. The <br />DISTRICT Planner noted the provision within the Shoreland District that limits lot <br /> coverage to a maximum of 30% impervious surface. Therefore, the <br /> appropriate protection is in place under this provision. <br />Barraclough noted that the increased front yard setback in the Shoreland <br />District actually pushes development closer toward a lake. Knudsen agreed <br />-3- <br />