Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Planning Commission <br />10 July 1984 <br />e. A genuine hardship exists in complying wii <br />Ordinance. <br />These conditions are evaluated with reference <br />a. (1) Special conditions, in this case nary <br />apply as the lot was legally platted <br />be used as a single family residence <br />(2) This circumstance is, in fact, prima; <br />only hardship is the inability to cr. <br />Page Two <br />the literal terms of this <br />the Wrona request below: <br />-less of the lot, do not <br />:'der the Ordinance and it may <br />rrently. <br />economic in nature, as the <br />?e two legal lots from one <br />b. Other properties in the area do not have art rights or privileges denied <br />to the applicant. <br />The narrowness of the lot is not an actic. , f the applicant, but is a <br />result of prior platting. <br />d. Granting the request would tend to confer special privilege denied <br />to other lots in the district. Without s;rficient hardship shown, the <br />City could compromise its future enforcern;,tf, of similar requests. <br />e, No genuine hardship exists, as the proper ;se of the lot could be <br />legally allowed at this time. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Failure to conform with any one of the above requirements can disqualify a <br />variance request. In this case, the request tails in four of five cordi -ions <br />(sections a, b, d and e). As no hardship exists, we cannot recommend approval <br />of the variance request. <br />cc: Joe Chlebeck <br />Ed Locke <br />Tom Sweeney <br />Mike Wrona <br />