Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />:March 8, 1984 <br />Nardini <br />Rezoning <br />(Cont.) <br />Mrs. Timmons suggested that it might be better if the residential <br />property requested R -1 zoning. ° *.r. Villeaux stated that he had <br />no objection to this, but this would not help Mrs. Nardini. <br />Mr. French asked if the City could deny an approved use under B -3. <br />'ir. Ducharme replied that the City could not do this. <br />'ir. DeLonais recommended that the rezoning to B -3 be approved under <br />the condition that the City knows what will go in on the property. <br />Motion seconded by Mr. Ducharme. <br />Mrs. Nardini stated that the City could not limit the property this <br />way. <br />Mrs. Timmons stated that the same restriction should then be put on <br />the abutting property. Timmons pointed out that no one knows what <br />will happen with this property. Timmons pointed out that Nardini <br />is asking for her property to be zoned what their property is. <br />Timmons stated that she feels it was a mistake when the property was <br />zoned to R -2. <br />Mr. Grittrnan stated that the down — zoning of the Villeaux and Peterson <br />property would not create an advantage for anyone. There would he <br />no buffer created. <br />Mrs. Timmons pointed out that if the City approved the B -3 for a <br />certain business, that business could go out in three years arxdthe <br />City could not control what went in. Timmons stated that the City <br />cannot make a person promise that they will stay in business. <br />'1r. DeLonais withdrew his motion and Mr. Ducharme withdrew his second. <br />Mr. flerkenhoff felt that the motion voiced the Planning Commission's <br />feelings and concerns for the residents in the area. <br />Mr. DeLonais recommended that the request to rezone the Nardini <br />property from R -2 to R -3 he denied. <br />Motion seconded by tlr. Herkenhoff. <br />Those in favor were Mr. DeLonais and Mr. Herkenhoff. <br />Those against were Mrs. Timmons and Mrs. Kingsbury. <br />Those abstaining were Mr. Costa, Mr. Ducharme and Mr. French. <br />Mr. Ducharme stated that he would vote for the rezoning if he knew <br />that no liquor would he involved on the site. Ducharme stated that <br />he would also not want to see the Iloggshreath parking lot extended. <br />Nardini stated that she is just asking that the property revert to <br />the zoning it was five years ago. <br />Fine —7-- <br />