Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-22-1989 Council Agenda
AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING February 22, 1989 A. 1. Call to Order - 7 :30 p.m. 2. Roll Call Mayor Mr. Michael Fahey Councilwoman Mrs. Beverly Scalze Councilman Mr. William Blesener Councilman Mr. Rick Collova Councilman Mr. Jim LaValle Recording Secretary Clerk /Treasurer Mr. Joseph Chlebeck N _� Attorney Mr. Thomas Sweeney i^ Engineer Mr. Donald Carley Planner Mr. David Licht Mr. Steve Grittman Guest 3. Approval of Minutes - February 8, 1989 Regular Meeting 4. Announcements ** *This agenda is subject to change by additions and deletions. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS Parties will be heard at 7:30 p.m., or as soon as they may be heard. 5. Continuation of Planned Unit Development Section 6 Area See Correspondence: Pages 3-5 - Planning Commission Page 6 - Minutes of Council Meeting on 1 -25 -89 Pages 7 -11 - Planner's Report Page 12 - PUD Area Map Page 13 - Letter from Mr. DeBace Comments: Motion to Close Hearing: Motion by 2nd by Motion to Table — Deny Approve Rezoning. Motion by 2nd by 6. Continuation of Text Amendment Ordinance 311 - Billboards See Correspondence: Page 14 - Minutes of Meeting on 1 -25 -89 Page 15 - Proposed Ordinance 311 Page 16 - MN Dot Procedures on Sign Removal Comments: Motion to Close Hearing: Motion by introduced Ord. 311 2nd by Ayes: Nays: 2nd by C. PRESENTATIONS 7. Pull Tabs Applicant: Trade Lake Camps, Inc. Appearing: Michael Meissner Location: Dick and Mary's See Correspondence: Pages 17 -18 - Application Motion: Recommend to Approve _ _ Deny Motion by - 2nd by 8. Palmen Final Plat - Little Canada Mid Oaks Appearing: Ron Palmen See Correspondence: Pages 1 -2 - Planning Commission Pages 19 -23 - Planner's Report Pages 21 -22 - Site Location Maps Page 23 - Plat Page 24 - Letter from Army Corps of Engineers Motion to: Approve Table Deny _ ` Other___.__,_ Motion by 2nd by _ Ayes Nays 9. R &S Final Plat - Rustad & Sandberg Addition Applicant: Louis Rustad See Correspondence: Pages 2 -3 - Planning Commission Page 25 - Plat Motion to: Approve Table Deny __ Other Motion by 2nd by Ayes `— Nays 10. Leibel Final Plat See Correspondence: Page 3 - Planning Commission Page 26 - Plat Motion to: Approve Table Deny _ Other_ Motion by 2nd by _ Ayes Nays 11. Salak Property Division Applicant: Richard Salak See Correspondence: Page 1 - Planning Commission Pages 27 -32 - Planner's Report Page 30 - Survey Pages 21 -32 - Site Maps Motion to: Approve _ Table Deny - Other,_____ Motion by -- 2nd by _ Ayes Nays ____ 12. Cellular One Appearing: Duane Caraway Driveway Entrance Change See Correspondence: Page 33 Motion to Approve Amended Plan: Motion by 2nd by — Ayes Nays 13. Approval of Bids for Water Tower Repairs Appearing: Jack Kollmer See Correspondence: Page 34 - Bids 14. KVBM Television - Proposed Tower Location Appearing: Daniel Peters See Correspondence: Pages 35 -38 Mike requested that a hearing be set for the meeting on March 22 on a site. Motion to call for Hearing: Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nays Site: D. OLD BUSINESS None E. NEW BUSINESS 15. Engineer a. County Capital Improvement Program b. Report on Co. Rd. C See Correspondence: Pages 39 -40 c. Keller Parkway Bike Path See Correspondence: Page 39 d. Approval of Final Payment Imp. 86 -7 Demont See Correspondence: Pages 41 -43 Motion to approve final payment and accept the improvement Motion by 2nd by _ Ayes ____ Nays e. Approval of Traffic Control Signals Agreement No. 62905 (Little Canada Road and Centerville Road) See Correspondence: Pages 44 -50 Resolution - Page 50 Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nays ^T 16. Attorney a. Reports if any 17. Planner a. Reports if any F. COUNCIL REPORTS 18. Economic Development - Mr. Fahey 19. Public Safety - Mr. Fahey 20. Utility - Mr. Blesener 21. Building and Zoning - Mr. Collova 22. Parks & Recreation - Mrs. Scalze a. Approval of Temporary On -Sale Liquor License Little Canada Recreation Association for Dance on April 1 See Correspondence: Page 51 Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nays b. Newsletter - Quotations from Press Publications and Success Factors, Inc. Motion to Accept Bid of Motion by 2nd by Ayes Nays —_ 23. Administration - Mr. LaValle a. Donna Schroeder Assessment See Correspondence: Pages 55 -56 Motion to Accept Check: Return Check Minus 1988 Payment ('88 Payable X89) b. Approval of Vouchers 24. Adjourn CORRESPONDENCE TO AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING February 22, 1989 PAGES CONTENTS 1 -5 Planning Commission Minutes 6 -13 Section 6 Area PUD 14 -16 Text Amendment Ordinance 311 - Billboards 17 -18 Pull Tab Permit for Trade Lake Camps, Inc. 19 -26 Palmen Final Plat 27 -32 Salak Property Division 33 Cellular One 34 Approval of Bids for Water Tower Repairs 35 -38 KVBM Television - Proposed Tower Location 39 -40 County Capital Improvement Program 41 -43 Approval of Final Payment Imp. 86 -7 Demont 44 -50 Approval of Traffic Control Signals Agreement No. 62905 51 Approval of Temporary On -Sale Liquor License - LCRA for Dance on April 1 52 -54 Newsletter Quotations 55 -56 Donna Schroeder Assessment Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA February 9, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota, was held on the 9th day of February, 1989 in the Council Chambers of the City Center, located at 515 Little Canada Road, in said City. Chairman Eugene DeLonais called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and the following members of the Commission were present at roll Call: MEMBERS PRESENT: Eugene DeLonais Art Herkenhoff Bill Davison Robert Pedersen David Bendel ALSO PRESENT: Stephen Grittman, City Planner Joe Chlebeck, City Clerk /Treasurer D. Catterton, Recording Secretary There being no corrections to the minutes of the January 12, 1989 Commission meeting, the minutes will stand approved as read. Salak Mr. Richard Salak appeared before the Commission regarding Property his property division at 3120 Labore Road. The property Division is R -1 Single family lots. A survey was submitted. Upon motion by Herkenhoff, seconded by Davison, the Commission approved the subdivision of Mr. Salak's property into lots, contingent upon the following: 1 - A grading and drainage plan be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to any final City action on this request, 2 - Drainage and utility easements be provided around all lot lines, 3 - Contribution to the park fund be made if deemed necessary by the Little Canada Parks Commission. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. Paimen Mr. Ronald Palmen appeared before the Commission regarding Final Plat approval of his final plat known as the Little Canada Mid Mid Oaks Oaks Addition. The site in question is zoned R -1 Single Addition Family. Page 1 MINUTES Planning Commission February 9, 1989 Upon motion by Davison, seconded by Herkenhoff, the Commission approved the final plat contingent upon the Engineers approval regarding utility and drainage. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. McNamara/ Mrs. Runestrand, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Mondor appeared Mondor PUD before the Commission informing them that a realtor for Mr. McNamara's office had previously contacted Mrs. Mondor and made an offer somewhere around $45,000.00 for the property. Mrs. Runestrand felt that the price was way too low. Mrs. Mondor informed the Commission that the City offered the Mondor's $85,000.00 for the property when the City was trying to acquire it under T.I.F. The Planner explained that $85,000.00 also included a relocation fee and that the City did not hire an appraiser because the project failed due to inadequate financing by the developer. Davison stated that the Developer had been told that he cannot just build on the property that he owns, but rather he must include other property. Mrs. Runestrand stated that she feels that Mr. McNamara was harassing her parents. Herkenhoff said that the Developer could develop something whether or not he buys the property. It depends upon the Council's approval. The Planner said that PUD zoning was required so that the City would have to approve and that an office building does not need approval. On behalf of the commission, Mr. DeLonais informed Mrs. Runestrand that they could make no promises. Matter tabled for further discussion. Rustad and Lewis Rustad, Jr. appeared before the Commission for Sandberg approval of the final plat for the Rustad and Sandberg Addition Addition. The Planner said that the Development Agreement was signed. Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Davison, the Page 2 MINUTES Planning Commission February 9, 1989 Commission approved the R &S final plat. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. Brink Applicant Sanford Brink was not present. Subdivision The Planner recommended that the subdivision plan be approved with a condition that they provide the Commission with Planning and Future Development of Property to the south. Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Herkenhoff, the Commission tabled the matter because of insufficient information. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. Liebel Delonais questioned why it has been so long for the final Final Plat plat. Joe Chlebeck said it is because the man is doing it by himself. Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Davison, the Commission approved the Liebel final plat. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. Section 6 The Planner said that at the last meeting the issue was PUD Matter misunderstanding of our standards. Mr. DeBace wrote a note to the Council and Mayor showing their interpretation of Il zoning. DeLonais stated that the City is not going to force them to build up to IP standards, but they can still build to 11 standards. Possibly a better grade of metal. The Planner said that maybe brick on the roadside. Basically, by going to PUD, site plans all go through the Council. Storage areas are controlled. If I1, they can go ahead and build and it might be sub - standard by one year from now. The recommendation is that the Commission pass PUD zoning in Section 5 areas. The hope of PUD being that as development property comes in they will be able to evaluate it on a case by case basis. The intent of PUD is for higher design quality. Nothing is approved without the Council. The City, in allowing a metal building may Page 3 MINUTES Planning Commission February 9, 1989 require that part of it be brick and /or that . the landscaping be upgraded on the freeway side in order to keep the aesthetic value. Pedersen asked if the Commission can set up different PUD criteria. DeLonais then stated that he agreed that as the soil is bad and that whatever is done for one will have to be done for all. Bendel stated that the PUD is future oriented. Upon motion by Davison, seconded by Bendel, the Commission approved the Section 6 PUD as recommended by the Planner, and that the PUD be developed by I1 standards on a case by case basis. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Motion adopted. I1 District The Planner submitted a report for changes in the Standards I1 District standards regarding the parking area, outdoor storage area and landscaping. It appears that people are storing things on landscape areas. He recommended that the wording "grassed or surfaced to control dust" be changed to "surfaced with gravel or paved ". DeLonais told the Planner that the land is hard to landscape because of subsoils. He also stated that he agrees with a wording change. The Planner also discussed the 5 foot strip surrounding all parking areas presently required by the Zoning Ordinance. He also suggested that at least two thirds of the landscaping be located forward of the rear building line of the principal building. DeLonais asked who sees it accept those who do business there. The Planner said that it's true that those who see it are those doing business there, but that if that is the attitude, than less care is taken and the property value will be decreased. DeLonais directed the Planner to give the Commission a Page 4 MINUTES Planning Commission February 9, 1989 report for comparison of the 2 I1 standards., Adjournment Upon motion by DeLonais, seconded by Herkenhoff, the Commission approved a motion to adjourn at 8:39 P.M. 5 ayes, 0 nays. Motion adopted. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:39 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, r- Deirdre J. Catterton Recording Secretary Page 5 MINUTES City Council Jan. 25, 1989 Rezoning the City Planner and Mr. Frattalone work out the size I -P lot that Frattalone would be increased from what Mr. Frattalone has proposed, but not Property prohibit the future splitting of the remainder of Frattalone's (Cont.) property. Fahey agreed with Blesener's position. The Council felt the matter should be tabled so that the various details can be worked out and brought back to the Council for consideration. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 89 -1 -34 - TABLING ACTION ON THE ZONING REQUEST OF FRANK FRATTALONE UNTIL THE APRIL 26, 1989 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING PENDING FURTHER INFORMATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Ayes (5) Blesener, Fahey, Collova, LaValle, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 21, Page 36. Section 6 Fahey pointed out that the Planning Commission tabled action on the PUD rezoning of the Section 6 property to PUD pending further information from the City Planner. Agenda Item No. 10 Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 89 -1 -35 - CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REMAINDER OF THE SECTION 6 PUD REZONING PROPOSAL UNTIL THE COUNCIL RECEIVES A REPORT FROM THE CITY PLANNER AND A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Ayes (5) Collova, Fahey, Scalze, Blesener, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 21, Page 37. Recess At this point in the meeting, 9:00 P.M., Council took a short recess. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 P.M. Page 6 northwest associated consultants, Inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: Little Canada Planning Commission FROM: Steve Grittman DATE: 2 November 1988 RE: Little Canada - South Owasso Boulevard Rezonings (Multiple Rezonings) FILE NO: 758.09 - 88.56 BACKGROUND At its 26 October meeting, the City Council adopted rezoning amendments for the northwest area of the City. Certain areas were zoned according to the original proposals, and other areas reflected Planning Commission recommendations for altered proposals. One area was left in its current status subject to further study. That area consists of the property north of the mobile home park, east of Ryan Industrial Park and south of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Original proposals called for a rezoning to I -P, Industrial Park from I -1, Light Industrial. The Planning Commission had recommended retaining the I -1 designation. The Council is contemplating a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning designation on this property. This report will examine the purpose of PUD zoning, its impacts and application to this area. Attached to this report is a map of the area as rezoned with the PUD area highlighted. ANALYSIS There are two uses of Planned Unit Development under the Little Canada Zoning Ordinance. One is as a conditional use permit process which maintains the base zoning district and the allowable uses in that zone. The second application of PUD is as a base zoning district itself. This is the proposal made for the subject property. Under PUD zoning, all allowed uses in other districts, whether permitted or conditional, are allowed. The approval process is a three stage process - concept, development, and final stages. Page 7 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 Impact on Vacant Parcels The intent of the utilization of PUD zoning here is to encourage as high a quality of industrial development as possible, given the existence of severe soil limitations in the area. While it is the City Council's intent to adhere to the I -P standards as closely as possible, PUD zoning will permit some flexibility in the application of those standards to specific sites and proposals. Where the soils or other site problems restrict the building materials or site utilization, the Council may relax or modify its standards in one area to allow development which exceeds the minimum standards in another area. Although PUD zoning may allow any particular land use type, industrial or commercial uses are directed by the Comprehensive Plan's proposed land use map. Impacts on Existing Development Since there are no specific performance standards in the PUD District such as lot coverage or building materials, expansions of existing uses and structures will be handled case by case, similar to new development on vacant land. Existing, legally established uses and buildings are "grandfathered" into the new district in their current situation. Changes to the use, whether they be an expansion of the site use or intensification of certain performance standards would be negotiated at the time of an application for building or zoning permit approval. RECOMMENDATION We believe the proposed PUD zoning to be a positive compromise measure between retaining the existing I -1 and rezoning to I -P District. In a PUD District, the City can be reasonably assured of as high quality development as is practicable, while the property owner can expect to be able to develop to performance standards which are rigorous but not so much that they make development an economic unreality. We recommend that the rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development (PUD) be approved. cc: Joe Chlebeck Tom Sweeney John Palacio Don Carley Page 8 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: northwest associated consultants, inc. Little Canada Planning Commission Stephen Grittman 10 January 1989 Little Canada - I -1 District Standards 758.09 - 88.69 The following performance standards are listed to generate discussion about possible amendments to the I -1, Light Industrial District. The particular items have been selected to target the primary enforcement problems which have been encountered by City staff in the industrial areas. Outside Storage. Currently, outdoor storage is an allowed accessory use in the I -1 District under certain restrictions. It can not occupy a front or side yard and must be "grassed or surfaced to control dust ". Staff recommends changing to wording such as "surfaced with gravel or paved ". There has been very little regulation of this item and the wording is vague. Another problem is that the definition between parking, loading, landscaping, and storage areas has become obscured on many properties, resulting in storage placed indiscriminately on the site, and taking up required parking spaces. Parking Areas. Currently, parking areas must be set back from any property line at least five feet. The City recently passed a requirement that all parking areas must be paved and curbed. No changes are suggested to these requirements. Landscaping. Currently, landscaping is required by the Zoning Ordinance text only in a five foot strip surrounding all parking areas. The inference is made that all areas not occupied by a building, storage, or parking must be landscaped and we would suggest making this a stated requirement of the Ordinance. In addition, we would recommend adding a minimum percentage of 15 percent lot coverage be landscaped. In addition, we would suggest that at least two thirds of the landscaping be located forward of the rear building line of the principal building. In Page 9 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 this way, most of the landscaping improvements will be visible from the street, assuring that the minimum improvements are not hidden at the rear of the parcel. The I -P District has minimum landscaping coverage of 25 percent. If the current minimums are applied to a typical I -1 lot, the results are in the range of five to ten percent landscaping average. The application of these standards are proposed to occur during any of the following events: • New development on a vacant lot. • Redevelopment or building additions requiring site plan review by the City. • Enforcement of any illegal non - conformities on the property. Legal non - conformities would be allowed to continue in the manner of the current use. cc: Joe Chlebeck Tom Sweeney John Palacio Don Carley Page 10 'f ypi tsar Latqouir Page 11 WASSeAILVD $ B -2 AUTO ORIENTED BUSINESS 8-3 GENERAL BUSINESS B -W BUSINESS WAREHOUSING 1 -1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I -P INDUSTRIAL PARK P PUBLIC CITY COUNCIL REZONING WITH PUD PROPOSAL Page 12 al& v-p, it pna PL, f kfrta at &. ops .. -A'nt\`' A-H\ -t_Ar rbilzA7 °L4.— PA r N 0 REC�vE JAN 251989 City of Little Canada 6 Page 13 MINUTES City Council Jan. 25, 1989 Mondor & M &M Properties (Cont.) The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Ayes (5) Scalze, Fahey, Collova, LaValle, Blesener. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 21, Page 33. Ordinance The Mayor opened the Public Hearing to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 311 No. 311 which eliminates the requirement that non - conforming signs be brought into conformity within a certain time period. Fahey pointed Agenda out that the reason that this Ordinance is being proposed, is that Item No. 8 this section of Ordinance is largely ignored and not enforced. Scalze suggested that if the Ordinance is being ignored, perhaps it should just remain pointing out that there may be a circumstance where it is needed. Scalze pointed out the situation of the billboard on Highway 36. The City Planner pointed out that if the City requires this billboard to be removed, the City may have to pay the owners to take down the billboard. The City Clerk reported that MN DOT may refund for the elimination of billboards. The Council suggested that action on the Ordinance be tabled for 30 days to give the City Clerk an opportunity to research whether or not MN DOT would pay for the elimination of the billboard on Highway 36. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 89 -1 -32 - TABLING ACTION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE N0. 311 FOR 30 DAYS IN ORDER TO GIVE THE CITY CLERK THE OPPORTUNITY TO INVESTIGATE WITH MN DOT THE SUBJECT OF COMPENSATION FOR THE ELIMINATION OF BILLBOARDS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 21, Page 34. Rezoning Fahey reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of Frank Frank Frattalone's request to rezone his property on Spruce Street Frattalone from I -P to I -1 leaving the 253 foot depth of property on South Owasso Property zoned I -P. Agenda Frank Frattalone appeared before the Council and submitted a site plan Item No. 10 showing the rezoning request as he has proposed. Page 14 4 ORDINANCE NO. 311 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA BY DELETING CERTAIN PROVISIONS REGULATING NON- CONFORMING SIGNS. THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 903.110.D.3. is hereby deleted. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Michael Fahey, Mayor PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA, AYES MINNESOTA THIS DAY NAYS OF , 19 Joseph G. Chlebeck, Clerk Page 15 Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Joseph G. Chlebeck ` DATE: February 17, 1989 RE: Billboard Sign Removal - MN Dot Procedure I talked to Al Salsbury 779 -1221 (Richard Dinneen 296 -1133) of MN Dot and he stated that the billboard must be non - conforming. Removal is through a court procedure. The State does pay for removal of signs when they have appropriate funds. Sometimes it takes a few years before the money is available. JGC:kpv Page 16 MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scaire Bill Blesener Rick Collova Jim LaValle Charitable Gambling Control Board Room N -475 Griggs•Midway Building 1821 University Avenue St. Paul. Minnesota 55104.3383 (612) 642.0555 GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION FOR BOARD USE ONLY %aeons. N VTOM AMT CHECK# DATE INSTRUCTIONS: ' A. Type or print In Ink. B. Take completed application to local governing body, obtain signature and date on all copies, and leave 1 copy. Applicant keeps 1 copy and sends original to the above address with a check. C. Incomplete applications will be returned. Type of Application: CCIass A — Fee $ 100.00 (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tlpboards, Pull•tabs) ,$Class B — Fee $ 60.00 (Rattles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs) CCIass C — Fee $ 50.00 (Bingo only) ❑Class 0 — Fee $ 25.00 (Raffles only) 1 Matta °necks Payable ta: Mlnnaaota Charitable Gambino Control Bowl 1 CYeegtlo 1, Is this application for a renewal) If yes, give complete license number I YasONo 2. If this is not an application for a renewal, has organization been licensed by the Board before? license number (middle five digits) 1 C o2 / % K $Yes ONo f_J If yes, give base 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously? If no, please attach copy 4. Ap pllicant (Official, legal ame of oroization) ire (4de L,gtie CP'� 1c 1tsic. 6. Cii1t'w. State, Zip 7, C_ Noari, SrG'At,L Mk) i 537 aLint 5. Business Addreas of Organization 2 /0 -7' e C. 9. Type of organization: C=raternal °Veterans °Religious ' ther nonprofit' "It organization d an "other nonprofit" organization, answer questions 0 through 13, If not, go to question 14. "Other nonprofit" organizations must document its taxroxemot status. A YIYesONo 10. Is organization incorporated as 4---i Attach organization? If yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and / ` book number: 560 't W5'2 1 Attach copy of certificate. `$ Yes ONo 11. Are articles filed with the Secretary of State? Yes ONo 12, Are articles filed with the County? ?<YesDNo 13. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes, please attach letter from IRS or Department of Revenue declaring exemption or copy of 990 or 990T. :'..Yes No 14. Has license ever been denied, suspended or revoked? If yes. check all that apply: I I 8. Business Phone Number (GIP. )777 -352a °Denied CSusoended °Revoked Give date' 15. Number of active members 18 17. Name of Chief Executive Officer c)e F —gas Note: If leas than four years, attach evidence of three years existence. 18. Name of treasurer or person who accounts for other revenues of the prgann. � / 125 tt.,er T r" 4Set• Title qes, ' u.Qd Or Business Phone Number Titles #/2] Mt,v /C l'407'0R, ( 1912) 971— 357a) Business Phone Number I a.) 777 —_75-2 2 19. Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted .--7\ �ICK4-MM -RY s 20. Street address (not P.O. Box Number) 35'/1 //deSv, 21, Gay, State, Zip L i ri G•e 0411)14 el ad. SS /lp 22. County iwnere gambling premises is located) ICH&A set C3.0001.02 (9.'(45) - White Copy•Board Canar•Appecarit Plnk•Locsl GGoverning Sody Page 17 Gambling License Application 'Type of Application: LJClass A Class B GClass C C :Class D Page 2 Yes ONo 23. Is gambling premises located within city limits? Yes ONo 24. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in 419 of this application? If not, complete a separate / application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises. 0Yes"SJJo 25. Does organization own the gambling premises? If no, attach copy of the lease with terms of at least one year. ❑Yes No 26. Does the organization lease the entire premises? If no, attach a sketch of 27. Amount of Monthly Rent the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch is not required for Class D applications. $ 9g DYes LL. No 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license? If yes, give days and times of bingo occasions: Days Times Yes ,^. No 29. Has the $10 000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 349.20 been obtained? Attach copy of bond. 30. Insurance Company Name S n w } 7 - e SO2irce (3 31. Bond Number R'Ps , 2 6 7 32. Lessor Name Mfr kr)e. L ilelssrJek 33, Address 3354 /VU Pic EC 34. City, State,Zip tin / C9nl4ci14 35. Gambling Manager Name Signature of person receiving application X 36. Address /� 5-CQt 0mti npo» 37. City, State, Zip / j-r?I <.e Elmo 1218/. x_62)1/2 E, / f)OMRS d'f}uet? 38. Gambling Manager Business Phone ( /O 1 a 1 776 - 69 L'r 39. Da member e gambling manager became of organization: / GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site, at any time, gambling is being conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law. OATH I hereby declare that: 1. I have read this application and all information submitted to the Board; 2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete; 3. All other required information has been fully disclosed 4. I am the chief executive officer of the organization; 5. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 6. I will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments thereto. 40. Official, Legal Name of Organization 41. Sgr)p use (must be signed by Chief Executive Officer) '7"i1 ed e L rla< r a sw a 1 n J. X • /5 /C'/ Date Title of Signer /I es/rteN r aFH2ci oP Dating-7)a t ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt, I admit having been served with notice that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the board, will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt (noted below), unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifically disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the below noted date. 42. Name of City or County (Local Governing Body) City of Little Canada If site is rocated within a township, item 43 must be completed, in addition to the county signature. Signature of person receiving appliccaattiii 43. Name of Township TA Clerk Treasura:Zgins Date received (30 day period from this date) 2/14/89 Signature of person receiving application X 44. Name of Person deliveryg -application to Local Governing Body 8. /on.inr ueoZ Title CG- 0001.02 (8/86) White Copy -Board Page 1 $Canary- Applicant Pink -Local Governing Body northwest associated consultants, inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Little Canada Planning Commission Michael Ridley /Stephen Gri_ttman 31 January 1989 Little Canada - Palmen Final Plat 758.09 - 89.05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: Mr. Ronald Palmen, 401 East Viking Drive, has submitted a request to final plat for a ten lot single family subdivision of his 4.78 acre parcel located northeast of McMenemy Street and Viking Drive. The site in question is zoned R -1, Single Family. Recommendation: We recommend approval of this final plat based on this report and NAC's preliminary plat report dated 7 July 1988. It appears Mr. Palmen has acquired approvals from each agency cited under conditions for approval from the planners preliminary plat report as directed by the City Council on 27 July 1988. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Little Canada Mid Oaks Final Plat Page 19 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat: The City Council approved the applicant's preliminary plat on 27 July 1988 subject to the planners recommendations and approval by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Palmen had stated at said meeting the Army Corps approval letter was forthcoming and has since received the letter and submitted it to the City Engineer. Lot Requirements: Lot lines for Lots 4 -7 have been slightly altered, however, all proposed lots still meet or exceed all Ordinance requirements for minimum lot area and width and the number of lots remains the same. The changes are only slight adjustments and do not alter the general layout or density of the plat. Easements: The Little Canada Subdivision Ordinance requires at least a six (6) foot drainage and utility easement along all lot lines for all subdivided property. This is a special concern in this case due to the existence of low lands at this site. By providing these easements now, future drainage problems, if any, can be dealt with and alleviated within established easements. Various Agency Approval: Based on NAC's recommendations from the 7 July 1988 report, the applicant has also received written approval from the St. Paul Water Works allowing a driveway access across the water works easement and written approval from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District to allow the proposed development near the wetland. RECOMMENDATION Although some lot lines have been altered between the preliminary and final plat, the number of lots remains the same and the lot area of all lots remain in excess of Ordinance standards. Because the proposal has gained approval from all pertinent agencies, we recommend approval of this final plat subject to all comments by City staff. cc: Joe Chlebeck Tom Sweeney Don Carley John Palacio Ronald Palmen Page 20 0 iel EzArN 0a acE1 nesot DNAS CG TO f2 ^IL1� *1 ,l 1 — 70e 1 Orr :p 0 •.n[WD00 fhl• map is for planning purpo• only and should not o• and when pure measurement is required. northwest associated onsultants, inc. Page 21 Exhibit A - Site Location \I � w�ncn HU. BASE 7^r)ttir, I 2 Page 22 REV. BY: eob clg otu ab da 8.23.13 o .. 2.76,63 Exhibit B - Detailed Site Locatior .Nntn: it is. rnrnmmnnrinri thnt in • Exhibit C - Final Plat • • REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Construction - Operat ons Regulatory Functions (88- 2476N -74) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL. DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1421 U.S. POST OFFICE & CUSTOM HOUSE ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1479 August 9, 1988 Mr. Ronald Palmen R. E. Palmen, Inc. 401 East Viking Drive St. Paul, MN 55117 Re: Place fill for residential development; unnamed wetland; Sec(s). 8, T. 29 N., R. 22 W.; Ramsey County, MN. We have reviewed the information provided us alout your project. The work is authorized by a nationwide Department of the Army permit, provided the enclosed conditions and management practices are followed. This determination covers only the project referenced above. Should you change the design, location, or purpose of the work, contact us to make sure a violation would not occur. Our telephone number is (612) 220 -0375. It is your responsibility to insure that the work complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS CONFIRMATION LETTER DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR STATE, LOCAL, OR OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. This authorization expires on January 12, 1992. If you have any questions, please call Vern Reiter at (612) 220 -0363. Enclosure(s) Sincerely, n Wopat �. P epat Chief, Regulatory Functions Branch Construction - Operations Division Determination: Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations 330.5 (a) (26) Based upon the information provided, this project would involve filling less than 1 acre of an unnamed, isolated wetland. It is, therefore, authorized by the nationwide permit referenced above. Page 24 • 4 'A Nseis4.. 007 --20502-- J 00 • ?0 0/ `At /ire or 5 '89??, et' Az 144 5.117 iP ,vite• or NW* i Socilz /.?U or X...:4•Pyin 4ve 7' CI mnrIoniVil (el 4 0 cc ot w co z — • .•'..rom/4 /,at./,4r ! ., ? .141...lh _NM? ii. if ..) ‘1. PIVO'Ort- --- - — ..,-- - C10 ''- it.., e. • if C. 00' "4,.." I Wel Ot•t: ,'. • ' ii 1 i . . . • - •-- .4 ■‘.. — — -. ... — _i_ 1.-Z, _ c) -.f.'s ,• "'Thor° A/ Company fastMent V' •.• — —r•-,0 IlL , . et r, * t A 4 •• •S et. e; , • , ler 00C. 46. 2/5051/ ' — — — _ _ —t_ — .0 . %Lb 1::::1 '1/4 • ii..k. -•C• Z Nye N. •••,-• N •Z Ni" .....t '.•-• . 2 1 1 1' j::•• •• \ en_ e...144_2 (2) se. 3 t ■ 2.) • 6.0.4 •:. " \ "1. ...: -- 20802 - '00-1 /PC) .**.Powq, /;ne ed/ A/ortA ;PI Pee/ • of toe 4,e.'4.4 Pre ferrec/ Pi:were:es No' Z1Z2 til't BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM. • Denotes iron monument set. • Denotes found monument. E. Q. Rut) sows, Iva 1.4410 St/RVEYogs CT: :St • --in 851-- 889 tzrart Page 25 iF 1' z (0 N 0 0 NOR 126.66 O 10 SOU T11 L __ - 6H66 2006 6 2 DJ m N pN 0 0? 001 m 0 A 0 NORTH 35.16 '21-- m m zI 0. zm m. O m - - SOUTH B2. }1 FT. -- - 9 °i 0W I I �: m 142)1 _.31 J6 m m NOR T 0 F NORTH 125.49 r 0 26.23 n tn - 1 m by 9 mi NI 0 J r �r ISOUTO 0 10 E_ 6000 NORTH N m 0 0 S,1J0b1508ON '9 F_ 2 2 tD m 0 .4 0 NORTH 290.94 O T w w r m�NORTH 14509 - - m Im J 0 ■ ■ m m 1 mh r -- m m o N n — 1427- — — 061111 2 t40 RiII 82 it _ __I 10 m rn a Y. T 3 /\ 2 , 2 m 1N3VJ3SV3 2 mo 30!96 NORTH' A LINE 41 4N0 PARE THE W L OF 5E N4 1\ I 0 0 3 =ym m 3 N m m o t-t m L / 0 T IV m 6 a r Z I m 1 /25000:, to V, r 61/4'''.,. '2-- 70.00 Nm ° I w N0 °3130 °W m 0 Ir ...H ■ 0 N p ( 1 _ _ ,_j6 0, m. m a10 m — — — 11 6 :-•- 70.00 f - -m' .O 0- I.. 607.74 N0 °31'30° W m N l° }ge 26,2 l- E. LINE OF W. e B 9e F OF SEC .031 E. I/2 S 08. 'O... 0 0 -A Y b15OtlON '9 I r J a I 00 northwest associated consultants, inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Little Canada Planning Commission Michael Ridley /Stephen Grittman 31 January 1989 Little Canada - Salak Subdivision 758.09 - 89.06 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: Mr. Richard Salak has submitted an application to subdivide his property located at 3120 Labore Road. The property in question is zoned R -1, Single Family and is approximately three .(3) acres in size. Mr. Salak is requesting a division of this property into two parcels. The western most portion of this property has an existing house, garage and barn located on it, which is proposed to be one lot while the other proposed lot has no structures on it. Recommendation: Based on information contained later in this report, we recommend approval of this subdivision request contingent on the following being provided: 1. A grading and drainage plan is submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to any City action. 2. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines. 3. Park dedication contribution is made if deemed necessary by the Little Canada Parks Commission. 4. All continents from City staff. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Site in Question Page 27 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 ANALYSIS Simple Subdivision: Because this application involves the division of one parcel into two, the Subdivision Ordinance specifies that the subdivides may be relieved in "complying with any requirements of this Ordinance that are deemed inappropriate ". This request appears to meet the definition of a simple subdivision. Lot Area and Requirements: The R -1 District requires corner lots to have a minimum lot area of 11,000 square feet. The proposed lot split will leave the corner lot with a lot size of approximately 28,000 square feet of area. All setbacks are met except for the side yard setback for the garage. This is a legally non - conforming situation that is not affected by the proposed division, however, because it is an existing structure. The vacant parcel will have a lot area of approximately 2.5 acres or 109,000 square feet, which exceeds the required lot size of 10,000 square feet. Grading and Drainage: A site inspection conducted at this site revealed a substantial change in grade elevation from west to east. It appears the grade falls approximately three feet and that some filling will have to take place to make the eastern lot a buildable one. A grading and drainage plan should be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Easements: At least a six (6) foot drainage and utility easement must be provided along all lot lines of both proposed parcels. Park Contribution: Because this division will create an additional parcel, the Little Canada Parks Commission should review the proposal and determine if a contribution to the park fund is necessary. Future Subdivision: Due to the size of the vacant parcel (109,000 square feet) created by this proposed subdivision, it is possible that this parcel could be subdivided to create more lots in the future. The Planning Commission may want to require Mr. Salak to provide a concept sketch illustrating the intended use of this east parcel. Page 28 RECOMMENDATION The property in question has substantial area to be divided into two R -1 single family lots. We recommend approval of this subdivision contingent upon the following: 1. A grading and drainage plan is submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to any final City action on this request. 2. Drainage and utility easements are provided around all lot lines. 3. A contribution to the park fund is made if deemed necessary by the Little Canada Parks Commission. 4. All comments from City staff. cc: Joe Chlebeck Tom Sweeney Don Carley John Palacio Richard Salak Page 29 en COUNTY 23a 59 40 i'ac} TRACT A 20.2-00 S. P4. 0.65 Ac. / W ,Y0 Ea o-W 18 202 GS -- PO,NT or se6IN N IN6 / Ln LINE PARnLLEL WITH THE NORTN LINE or -cc 4 T \'e / ea 0/ / 515 ":jr2025 ,2„ 0 O N. LINE OF NE 1i4 or NW SEC 4, T. 29 F ROAD TRACT 8 • 544,926 5t Th. 7.92 At. • • 9 5 OO Page 30 iA LME PARALLEL WITH N. LNG Or SEL 9 - • • wL■T 4e550 DEED-• 500 00 iALA% N //2 SEC. 4 T. 2; 100 O.' '. 466 990 H .43 e.e. 0 ,Z9 u. R,3o:u. \�e 1r.1 (36) -! (37P a• .45 •Iao 126.13•1 A ?pc 3105 (43) 2 ;" , i 1 fc0l CH 01 a A Fill N 12 308 3078 •c ' .494.:L • i.N. x nu,NS<Ip.j� . Z A,. 1,)306 ac � .59s. (s) u?- >8,.'n i 9i of 14.5, P rawer It 5 1.54ac. 3 340, I 3o 6o aSy._ t14.,c. 35058 f1 ac 3056 50 a m 611 (3i 150' :. 30`16 /t1 fln? 1 45a+- ese) t•'v 4v 30Ho (.; 44If '� w ° ♦t 11 Lr l�• 39 328'^ 032. c n N (&) -1: a.c 6+) ll(1) NQ V4 • c.414 5 I -3. S - ( $,. 1307 COUNTY /. 54 ,< ('433) _ ,1 60? .2) Page 31 i'1 1 tor) 1X■1 54,5. 34 (3) 23,(.2 ao. Exhibit CL...Site in Question SOTA 1 MIL ScAL.a. Or Mt Les 694 Page 32 /Exhibit B - Detailed Site Loc tion RO/0oscO 5 /TUM //va/5 5 -ccESS RO/9o, /2' IN/Da- G 5H /G/-1 CHH /N AS ED WIRE 5E6 5kEET DETA /GS OF As4ronorn;cnr NO° 58' 15 "W oc i kc ace+ P,OPOSE& /2%' s, rE /8.954.8 X/�T /NG OA/7E9LP 9 c5 0 Azi/ 46 26S OFFSE QF e BID OPENING — FEBRUARY 15, 1989 2:00 P.N. PROJECT: CLEWING, REPAIRING AND PAINTING OF 1.5 HYDROPILLAR - LITTLE CANADA, FIN AEC PROJECT 05008 -647 PLAN HOLDERS BID SEC. ITEM 81 STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS ITEM 02 ITEM 03 SURFACE REPAIRS INTERIOR. ITEM 04 cr COMPLETE D%T FRi0 R ITEM 06 SHIP ECIERIOR ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Odland Protective Coatings H & H Water Tower 5% Bid Bond No Bid 18,250.00 23,800.00 2 750.00 96 500.00 2,750.00 116,900.00 137 800.00 160,000.00 37,500.00 138,500.00 ITEM o6 LErI RING N/A 7,000.00 ALTERNATIVE TOTAL BID 255 300.00 310,450.00 ALTERNATIVE TOTAL BID 155,000.00 288.950.00 Neumann Company Contractors T^.nyer Coatings Bid Bond Bid Bond 25,000.00 37,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 109,900.00 110,160.00 156,000.00 181,850.00 97,00.00 108,720.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 298,400.00 337,010.00 239,400.00 263,880.00 Abhe & Svoboda Bid Bond 23,000.00 3,250.00 137,300.00 337,456.00 284,000.00 8,600.00 509,606.00 456,150.00 Rainbow, Inc. Bid Bond 9,500.00 1,950.00 95,200.00 115,275.00 55,650.00 3,600.00 225,525.00 165,900.00 Page 34 FAMOUS TOWERS OF THE WORLD 2000 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 -�' DANIEL PETERS President KVBM TELEVISION INC. Channel 45 West 80th Street 831-2299 5001 (612) Suite 901 738 -0049 Minneapolis, MN 55437 11 PARIS STAR OF THE MOSCOW TORONTO NORTH LANDMARK TOWER Page 35 (817- 335 -8666) IADELPHON, INC.) DWG: WORLD TOWERS Office of JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Joseph G. Chlebeck %°`� DATE: February 17, 1989 1 RE: Site Locations for TV Tour Site No. 1 North of Garage - Appears to be enough room. City has clear title. Roger and 1 do not see any problems. Site No. 2 Compost Site - Location has alot of peat, and we may have a title problem because we acquired the land by a tax forfeiture State Use Deed (ponding). The County may require us to purchase the property if the tower is located here. Site No, 3 Twin Lake Road - Too close to residential area. JGC:kpv Page 36 to MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalze Bill Blesener Rick Collova Jim LaValle t• it es ;,.• • 1 4 • Coe ..!•3 3acpt 4 • t. :•• 1:::i•;•;••• •Z••• • ••atkS:;',STI; e. • I's • (4) • •t. eja - \\IP ;.• 51246. .t.4 3184 r. ! 0.‘•• . • .1."• k • 4.4, 6, • ••■2, I_ •.• :65 :2 „ • t" ' 1-0 4.e • 43/4,3 •• •,adt-4 . A 1 it. atsm i " I , 1 sJ- .r-f l'••• • 25 Lao • • . .7 • I.•••• ..s 3 $ t• 15/),,R • t . - • " LAKE. - - • „) • I 511.4A svp.omms rt. 9 t • ocz,. • NstAt0•••" 3 i3‘, a viLL Prta !•• ) 1-a] .tv 3 N 0 RTH •ot • ••••• •• A . 01--L; 3 • • .# ,N 00 4.14-a tr. So\ I..., • ••••••_ .4 ••• N...".4„..S45 AO •, 15'141 • .••• LOCATION .. ..1 ••••• •••!:: Is .• Stec 3101 \ I (3) •9,-TEP 3164 5 5- (1) 1 • .. ...... - - ...... • A-• a (4) Page 37 ' • . T $.w m • 51/2 SEC.3 W I 33 7l' O 2 t 1 2? . c4t -5 I T. • . t 1 °4G, zsE LLOCCAITION -3- .s ,1 LY• `'� / 34/Deed/, pa 4e ¥69. 1/4/Zit/it-I\ /it)\ o; d1 d .S.92^,t) \ T ` \ I \ t 3.4 ear, 44 at. /£Sp (a) 2,2p - — t —j ° �O r A Z�� ,. IOS 0010 9. 99; 3t 64ac �2) 'I °to 1401_ 110 6 1 aA64 "Il6.y..11 Ili• '�:. ... :.n a6S' .0 4) t; Y `r a 60E o ; s) a 9oE �C ) 1 h4 r 23B �If.63 ax... sri E^s A� a `g1,PW - -r W: PIN -tg _ an v, .z Y-40 R 03-7-n0 U u La .6 L' x , C°) ., . �e" C3) 3 s ,� • 33tiZ /I 1_ ! f _45j.�s) _ ..33at-- oc. _F we 3333 ' 4 llto �, .. y, .4 .O 1 LIB... r ae .c 1 a L4. �p 0 �9� .a a t .23.24 2024 1.. �.....:I__!.. a .o95 2.S' r.3 eo • (Se Page 38 43 591. ,93 c ,rl) 3331 30 51 45 .4.5 at t-445.25 3317 .� 12) to t� 1' 2r1 ` 1 v. i? t9.. 2. J 4 (z! L :�0 ....3'292 ' �' r.v a. 77.51.1.5 - , ^(:.5 i• Oar _ I< 3 h %L 41f: _ O y )L ` s n1 "1 �'`< /0 1054 '.3�1 v \ �ilt� tcstil 326 A. Ramsey County Department of Public Works 350 St. Peter Street Suite 270 Saint Paul. Minnesota 55102 (612) 2984127 February 1, 1989 Kenneth E. Weltzin Director and County Engineer Paul L. Kirkwold Deputy Director and Assistant County Engineer Mr. Donald 0. Carley, P.E. City Engineer City of Little Canada 515 East Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 Ramsey County 1989 -91 Capital Improvement Program Thank you for sending Little Canada suggestions for projects to be evaluated in preparing Ramsey County Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The City of Little Canada suggested five projects for evaluation in the CIP. A total of 102 potential projects were submitted by 14 municipalities within Ramsey County. An additional 88 projects were included from the previous Capital Improvement Program. The cost of constructing these 190 projects totals approximately $118 million. A copy of the preliminary program is attached for your information. This copy includes the changes recommended by the Technical Advisory Committee at the January 19, 1989 meeting. In response to your letter, the following projects have been scheduled in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP): - Curbing of the South side of Little Canada Road from Schletty Road to the Little Canada Fire Hall has been placed in the non - programmed category. - Reconstruction of Little Canada Road from Rice Street to County Road C has been placed in the non - programmed category. Construction of a bike path on Keller Parkway and Arcade Street from Little Canada Road to County Road B2 was not placed in the program. Ramsey County has no funds for construction of a bike path unless it is part of a road improvement project or funds are available from Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) for the construction of bike paths. - Reconstruction of Centerville Road from the waterworks to Edgerton has been placed in the non - programmed category. - Reconstruction of County Road B2 from Arcade Street to Greenbrier has been placed in the non - programmed category. of projects within the programmed or non - programmed categories is based evaluation and subsequent priority score in comparison to other projects. support is one factor considered in evaluating projects. Funding availability advancement of projects. Page 39 Placement upon their Your city's will affect Mr. Donald Carley page 2 A meeting for the review of the draft 1989 -91 CIP by the cities within Ramsey County has been scheduled for February 15, 9:00 -11:00 a.m. at Ramsey County Public Works Department, 3377 North Rice Street, Shoreview, MN. You are invited to send me your written comments on the program by February 24, 1989. A final program, prepared after consideration of your comments, will be explained at a public meeting at 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, March 7, 1989, in Room 316 of the Courthouse, Saint Paul, Minnesota, conducted by the Public Works Committee of the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners. After the program is approved by the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners, a copy of it will be sent to you. Sincerely, 77, .,,.,cam Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director and County Engineer TM:ptd Enclosures Page 40 LN & SSOCIATES, IN Consulting Engineer, —land Surveyors City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484 -3301 Feb. 16, 1989 RE: Demont Ave. Final Payment Dear Council Members: We are submitting herewith the final estimate for improvement 86 -7 Demont Avenue. We have inspected the work and find it complies with the specifications. We would therefore recommend acceptance of the work and payment of the final estimate. Yours truly, MILNER W. CARLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, P.P. Vice Pres. DOC:sjl Page 41 SSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Enginon - land Surveyors City Council City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Rd. Little Canada, Minn 55117 2031.501 Field Office Basic 2104.501 Remove CM Pipe 2104.501 Remove RC Pipe 2104.521 Salvage CM Pipe 2104.521 Salvage RC Pipe 2105.501 Common Excavation 2105.505 Muck Excavation 2105.521 Granular Borrow LV 2105.525 Topsoil Borrow LV 2211.501 Aggregate Base CL 5A 2341.504 Bit. Mat for Mixture 2341.508 Wearing Course Mixture 2341.510 Binder Course Mixture 2.357.502 Bit. Mat for Tack Coat 2451.513 Fine Filter Aggregate 2503.511 54" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 42" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 33" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 30" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 27" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 24" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 21" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.511 18" RC Pipe Culvert CL 4 2503.515 54" Pipe Apron w /Trash Guard 2503.515 30" Pipe Apron w.Trash Guard 2503.515 24" Pipe Apron w /Trash Guard 2503.515 18" Pipe Apron w.Trash Guard 2502.541 Perforated B6 Pipe Drain 2503.571 Install 54" Jacking Pipe 2506.508 Construct MH Design 4019 2506.508 Construct MH Design A 2506.509 Construct CB Design A,C 2506.509 Construct CB Design LP 2506.511 Reconstruct MH 2506.512 Reconstruct CB 2506.516 Casting Assemblies 2506.522 Adjust Frame & Ring Cast. 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 484-3301 February 13, 1989 RE: FINAL ESTIMATE Impr. 86 -7 SAP 2.00 - 109 -01 Frattalone, Inc. 1 Ea. 820 L.F. 97 L.F. 376 L.F. L.F. 21,754 C.Y. 6,252 C.Y. 20,154 C.Y. 1,217 C.Y. 11,468.26 Ton 312.85 Ton 2,760.27 Ton 2,892.34 Ton 700 Gal. .34 C.Y. 779.50 L.F. 350 L.F. 212.5 L.F. 425 L.F. 229 L.F. 484.5 L.F. 269.5 L.F. 1,927 L.F. 1 Ea. 1 Ea. 1 Ea. 6 Ea. 720 L.F. 64 L.F. 5 Ea. 12 Ea. 23 Ea. 5 Ea. 16 L.F. 8.8 L.F. 40 Ea. 8 Ea. Page 42 3,000.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z nnn nn Ran 00- 47 00- 376.42 1.75 38,069.50 2.59 �6 192.68 3.95 79,608.30 7.00 8,519.00 6.85 78,557.58 170.50 53,340.93 13.64 37,650.08 12.10 34,997.31 1.21 847,10 10.00 340 00 97.00 75,611.50 69.00 24,150.00 44.30 9,413.75 37.00 15,725.00 34.00 7,786.00 29.00 14,050.50 23.00 6,198.50 20.00 38,540.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 821.00 821.00 650.00 650.00 520.00 3,120.00 12.00 8,640.00 314.73 20,142.72 3,900.00 19,500.00 990.00 11,880.00 660.00 15,180.00 1,200.00 6,000.00 150.00 2,400 00 150.00 1,320.00 235.00 9,400 00 150.00 1,200.00 2511.507 2511.511 2531.501 2571.541 2575.501 5275.502 2575.505 5275.511 5275.531 0504.602 0504.602 Grouted Rip -Rap 20 02 C.Y. Granular Filter - C.Y. Concrete C & G 8,564 L.F. Transplant Trees 9' Ea. Roadside Seeding 2.35 Acr. Seed Mixture Type 7 196.5 Lb. Sodding 11,968.8 S.Y. Mulch Material Type 1 4.7 Ton Commercial Fertilizer 0.41 Ton Adjust Hydrant 5 Ea. Adjust Valve Box 16 Ea. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 2104.501 2104.509 2211.501 2341.504 2341.508 2501.515 2503.511 2503.521 2503.571 2503.573 2506.508 2506.509 2506.516 2511.507 2511.511 2575.501 2575.505 2575.511 2575.531 35.00 10.00 4.50 150.00 137.50 3.85. 1.43 187.00 462.00 300.00 75.00 TOTAL . . • • Remove CM Pipe 100 L.F. Remove Catch Basin 2 Each Aggregate Base 45 Ton Bit.Material for Mixture 8.25 Ton Wearing Course Mixture 149.09 Ton 18" Pipe Apron with T/G 1 Each 18" RCP Pipe Sewer CL 4 48.5 L.F. 48" Arch RCP Pipe Sewer 347 L.F. Install Surge Basin (Plate 5200B) 1 Each Install Control Structure 1 Each Construct MH Design 4019E 2 Each Construct CB Design C4002E 1 Each Casting Assemblies Furnished and Installed 4 Each Grouted Rip Rap C1.3 Granular Filter Roadside Seeding Sodding Mulch Material Type 1 Commercial Fertilizer 12 -12 -12 Trench Stabilization FINAL ESTIMATE 56 Cu Yd - Cu Yd 0.37 Acre - Sq. Yd. 0.74 Ton 0.11 Ton 14.5 Ton CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 GRAND TOTAL LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS FINAL AMOUNT DUE aaal Page 43 Donald 0.. Car:ley� Vice - President 700.70 38,538.00 1,350.00 323.13 756 53 17,115.38 878.90 189 42 1,o0 00 1,200 00 $708,496.41 3.00 300.00 125.00 250.00 7.85 353.25 196.00 1,617.00 15.60 2,325.80 520.00 520.00 22.00 1,067.00 112.00 38,864.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 3,900.00 7,800.00 890.00 890.00 235.00 940.00 35.00 1,960.00 10.00 - 137.50 50.88 1.50 - 187.00 138.38 462.00 50.82 10.00 145.00 $708,496.41 62,572.13 $771,068.54 754,265.94 $ 16,802.60 $62,572.13 Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55109 February 8, 1989 Mr. Joseph Chlebeck City Clerk- Treasurer City of Little Canada 515 East Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 Dear Mr. Chlebeck: /' REc iVEO FEP 9 1989 City of Little Canada Telephone 779-1178 SUBJECT: S.P. 6280 -246 CSAH 21 (Little Canada Rd.) at Co. Rd. 139 (Centerville Rd.) in Little Canada - Ramsey County Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 62905 Attached is a copy of an agreement between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, Ramsey County, and the City of Little Canada covering the revision of the maintenance terms and conditions in existing Agreement No. 62905 for the traffic control signal at the above referenced intersection. If this agreement meets with your approval, kindly present it to the City Council for their approval. The original copies of this agreement have been sent to Ramsey County. We will send the original copies to you after they are fully executed by the County. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Bernie Arseneau at 779 -1125. Sincerely, 4,-/L1// J =- Kermit K. McRae, District Engineer Attachment: Page 44 Art Equal Opportunity Employer SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 62905 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND THE CITY OF LITTLE CANADA Revise the Ma No. 62905 for Emergency Veh Highway No. 2 Road) in Litt TO intenance Terms and Conditions in existing Agreement the Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, isle Pre - emption and Signing on County State Aid 1 (Little Canada Road) at County Road 139 (Centerville le Canada, Ramsey County, Minnesota. S.P. 6280 -246 S.P. 62- 621 -04 IR 035E- 4(189) Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE None Page 45 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered WHEREAS, there exists in full force and effect Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 62905 dated December 3, 1987, entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State ", and the County of Ramsey, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", and the City of Little Canada, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the State, the County and the City recently mutually agreed to the following changes and additions to the maintenance terms and conditions in said agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Paragraph No. 9 of said agreement is hereby revised as follows: Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3c [County State Aid Highway No. 21 (Little Canada Road) at County Road 139 (Centerville Road)] hereof, it shall be the County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) provide necssary electrical traffic control signal with power for the street lights operation of the installation, (2) maintain the lumainaries, (3) relamp the traffic control signal and street lights, and (4) clean and paint the traffic control signal, cabinet, and luminaire mast arm extensions. The State shall maintain the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, repair knockdowns of the traffic control signal system, perform S.A. 1 to 62905 -1- Page 46 all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance, and is responsible for the timing and operation of the traffic control signal, all on a reimbursable basis with the County. 2. The following Paragraph is hereby added to said agreement: The State and the County shall enter into a Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 65613 -R covering maintenance of the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, repair of knockdowns of the traffic control signal system, performance of all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the County, and the responsibility for the timing and operation of the traffic control signal by State Forces and the terms and conditions covering payment therefor by the County. 3. Paragraph No. 14 of said agreement is hereby revised as follows: Upon proper execution by the City and the State, the EVP System for the traffic control signals on Trunk Highway No. 35E East Ramp and West Ramp - County Drive at County State Aid Highway No. 21 (Little Canada Road) and on County State Aid Highway No. 21 (Little Canada Road) at County Road 139 (Centerville Road) shall become a part of Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 1886 -R between the City and State covering S.A. 2 to 62905 -2- Page 47 operation, revision, maintenance and removal of EVP Systems by State forces at the cost and expense of the City. 4. Except as provided for herein, all terms and conditions contained in said Agreement No. 62905 shall remain in full force and effect. S.A. 3 to 62905 -3- Page 48 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By District Engineer Assistant Commissioner Operations Division APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: Dated DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By Special Assistant Attorney General -State of Minnesota Dated S.A. 5 to 62905 -5- Page 49 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Little Canada enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To revise existing Agreement No. 62905 dated December 31, 1987, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Agreement No. 62905, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Little Canada I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Little Canada at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1989, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (Seal) Page 50 City Clerk- Treasurer PS-09079.01(8/851 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PHONE 612- 296 -6159 LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY • ST. PAUL, MN 55101 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 to 3 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION /�GG %%%� 7i(:' G-rtk.� /CCi'YG'�<,'- ,�•�... �Sr-cii.7'77,• ^. /c DATE ORGANIZED C ' l %S:S N0. OF MEMBERS TAX EXEMPT NUMBER STREET ADDRESS /�� /G C' /5/ze1 L'CC ci ✓7 i CITY j/ ,/� 1 4i /i /C Cinu'i 4 STATE 1/// ZIP CODE _5 S%/7 NAME OF ERSON MAKING APP CATION kO ke -r7- X. -ScrLZf B INESS ?HONE (6/1 ) L. e 71'/.5— HOME PHONE (62/Z) 913 )05-5" DATES LIQUOR ILL BE SOLD? 11 TO 3 DAYS) ✓Y! y ; / / U 9 , DOES ORGANIZATION HAVE A CHARTER 24s ❑ No GENERAL PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATION \/( UL Spcwk At- 1-)1.4 ir e ORGANIZATIO FFICER'S NAKIE -e -GS' ire/Cy e.L «w ADDRESS ' ioi r.tv,d 4. 6,c/1,441._ nitii 5-5), 7 ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME 2 C . /vcLC- 1?a -.L,, ADDRESS "� 6 -? a / ' /12 .k.., 557e9' ADDRESS n �C 9 C r t o . ed Vdcf , i is AM) Ss i/; ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME �J ,r Crmt IC K Location where license /will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. C /� ..51.. LT 65cDtS \ : Lan-. in_ le Oi.- Lc. r:. (7JC -C `7 rPL) /Z1I .2 6.a-, Me• //tele. E'6eti) !e- cc . 4 /11-.110_ G: ff24-cl « 5 S' 17 ✓ Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the Liquor licensee providing the services. i9/0 Will the applicant carry liquor liability insurance? If so, the carrier's name and amount of coverage. (Note: Insurance is not mandatory) ,ti`l APPROVAL LITTLE CANADA CITY OF DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID • y/� mod` /•� APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR i IG AAT E CITV ERK NOTE: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division will be returned as the license. Submit to the City Clerk at least 30 days before the event. age N 4779 Bloom Ave., White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 • 612 - 429 -7781 Eugene D. Johnson Publisher Mr. Joe Chlebeck City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Road St. Paul, MN 55117 Dear Joe: February 8. 1989 f igi- .; I apologize for not getting back to you os oner on the price quote on interviewing and doing the pictures and stories for the newsletter. I now have available Mrs. Joan Gerten, who is a resident of Little Canada and is available to us on a contract basis. She has been doing some news writing for us now. The cost for us handling the news portion in addition to the printing would be $200 for the four page 8 1/2 X 11 size. After a couple of issues, we will evaluate the time spent and the quality of the work with you. There is a possibility it could be a little less once we're under way. If this meets your approval, and of course, that of council, we would like to have Maude Lovelle of our production department and Joan Gerten meet with you to discuss the time table for the first newsletter that you would like to have produced. If you need further information or some other questions pop up, just give me a call. We look forward to being able to do this for ou. EDJ /cjm Page 52 Sir•-'ely, n on White Bear Press N North Suburban Press N St. Croix Valley Press N Quad Community Press N Blaine Community Press Mr. Joe Chlebeck City of Little Canada 515 Little Canada Rd. St. Paul, MN 55117 Bid for: City of Little Canada Newsletter submitted by: Laurie A. Pomeroy 4000 copies 4 pages -8 -1 /2x11 60 lb. paper stock -white or color typesetting and keylining (the city provides information) 3 photographs bid: $583.00 labeling (labels 4 across on a page) $40.00 per 1000 bagging /mailing $30.00 200.00 = 783.00 postage would be separate, depending on number of pieces. accepted by: la- is_ -ilJ e Page 53 1/30/89 Proposal for Mr. Joseph Chlebeck Plan 1 —You supply copy and B/W photos (81/2 X 11 format) a.) We provide one proof -copy for your changes and approval; then one camera ready computer typeset layout. 4- pages...$247; 2- pages...$145 b.) If we supply printing with the above typeset: 4,000 copies on 60# white offset paper, folded, black ink with addt'l color 1 -side. 4- pages...$327; 2- pages...$238 c.) Two - photos per issue included in above printing cost. Addt'I photos...$8 /ea. d.) Optional: computer typeset can be enhanced as per sample © $14 /page Plan 2 —We provide writing a.) Writing, interviews, headlines, creative and proof for your approval: 4- pages...$344; 2- pages...$194 b.) Optional: black/white photography (includes travel within metro area), film, processing and handling...$25 per assignment c.) Optional: quality artwork for logos and mastheads at very reasonable cost. You might consider a drawing of the City Center for the newsletter masthead Plan 3—We provide total package: Writing, Computer Typeset, Printing 4 -pages 2 -pages Computer typeset $247.00 $145.00 Printing 4000 copies, folded 327.00 238.00 Computer enhanced 56.00 28.00 Writing, creative 344.00 194.00 Two printed photos (included) (included) Travel, handling, interviews (included) (included) Total (Less 10% Discount:): $876.60 $544.50 Prices include consultation, material pick -up and delivery to City Center, and metro travel when required. Tax additional if applicable. Page 54 P.S. This proposal is a sample of computer typeset quality. Success Factors, Inc, 70 W. Camty Road C. Suite702 St. Paul, MN 55117 (612) 490-0792 Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Joseph G. Chlebeck DATE: February 17, 1989 RE: Schroeder Assessment On February 7 we received a check from Donna Schroeder in which she paid her assessment in full. The problem we have is that the check is six months too late. It should have been paid between August and September of 1988. I discussed this matter with Ted Anderson of Ramsey County and he informed me that if the Council wishes to waive the first years interest ($2,797.00), the City may keep the entire check. If not, the City can keep $17,222.02 and return to her the remaining amount which appears on her 1989 taxes. JGC:kpv Page 55 MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalxe Bill Blesaner Rick Collova Jim LaValle LITTLE CANADA LOCAL MPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS PA..h 4 AUDITOR 15767 DONNA MAE SCHROEDER 15438 LONEHILL ROAD LOS GATOS, CA. 95030 PAY TO THE ORDER OF LQ yL BANKOF ERICA BLOSSOM IO XO H1 RO0OSER BRANCH 0974 1370 P.O. BOX 10040 SAN JOSE. CA 95151 ./ F 97 11- 35/1210 Page 56 L MEMO -- 1: L21E0003581 :029 711109747^10004311' E �^ TAX DESCRIPTION OWNER ANO /OR TAXPAYER GEOGRAPHIC COOS SSSECT ION OF 5 TOWN 29 RRyyANCEp 22 FT Ur 152 FT W 1 /4NOF4NW 1 /h1UF SEC 5 TN 29 RN 22 DONNA MARY NADEAU /FEE 153BJ MUNTAL8AN ORLVE fAX PAYER GONNA M SCHROEDER 15438 LONE HILL ROAD LOS GATOS CA 95032 SEC rw.. �9 NcE Gin .O 05 1 22 2 1 I 0004 • FOOTAGE OF PROPERTY SAN SEWER 90 3.98 WATERMAIN 91 • 3.98 PAID BEFORE CERTIFICATION •MOUNT DATE PECSIPT NO POSTED nY PROPERTY ADDRESS DESOTO ST ADOPTION DATE' 08/24/88 REGDLARRINT €RESTS' .10000 NUMBER OF YEARSI 6 PAID TO COUNTY TREASURER AMOUNT DATE RECE IPT NO POSTED 0Y ASSESSMENTCOOf 5767 ASSESSMENT NAME SWIMP—BT —B 20,666.42 TOTAL ASSESSMENT LIMITED TO SPACE ABOVE DECREMENTS IN PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST INSTALLMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN REAL ESTATE TAXES BALANCE INSTALLMENT INTEREST , YEAR ASSESSMENTS CODE 5767 5767 5767 5767 5767 5767 AMT, INC. INTEREST 6,241.41) 5,166.60 4,822.18 4,477.72 4,133.30 3,788.84 20,666.42 17,222.02 13,777.62 10,333.21 6,888.81 3,444.40 3,444.40 3,444.40 3,444.41 3,444.40 3,444.41 3,444.40 2,791.00 1,722.20 1,377.77 1,033.32 688.89 344.44 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 S WIMP =87=8 SWIMP -87 -8 SWIMP-87-8 SMIMP -87 -8 SWIMP -87 -8 5M1MP -87 -8 FEB Q 1 �I'i? ° TI i City of / ,' Little Canada ,.� _- ,'/ DONNA MAE SCHROEDER 15438 LONEHILL ROAD LOS GATOS, CA. 95030 PAY TO THE ORDER OF LQ yL BANKOF ERICA BLOSSOM IO XO H1 RO0OSER BRANCH 0974 1370 P.O. BOX 10040 SAN JOSE. CA 95151 ./ F 97 11- 35/1210 Page 56 L MEMO -- 1: L21E0003581 :029 711109747^10004311' E �^