My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1989 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
08-23-1989 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 2:24:39 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 1:25:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Planning Commission <br />August 10, 1989 <br />Larry Hartman, neighboring property owner, reported on the <br />tresspassing problems that occurred during construction of <br />Slumberland. Hartman was also concerned about the condition <br />of the site and reported on semi noise during the middle of <br />the night at the Slumberland site. Hartman informed the <br />Commission that he reported this noise problem to the City <br />as well as Slumberland and it took two to three months to <br />get the problem resolved. <br />Costa reported that Slumberland has not lived up to the <br />City's expectations. Costa asked who is responsible for the <br />maintenance of the holding pond and its banks. <br />The City Planner pointed out that the recommendations in his <br />report addresses screening and landscaping. <br />Diane Hartman pointed out that her home faces the south side <br />of the Slumberland building and she is forced to look at <br />concrete, weeds and junk. Hartman felt that the Slumberland <br />site will be a disgrace to the park that the City is <br />constructing in the area since the park will face such an <br />eyesore. <br />Owen Hyland, property owner in the area, stated that he was <br />opposed to the storage of semi - trailers on the Slumberland <br />site. <br />Drabik asked if the City's noise ordinance addressed the <br />problem of noisy truck traffic to the Slumberland site. <br />The Planner replied that it did not. <br />Costa stated that he was of the impression that the area was <br />to be an exclusive industrial park. Costa questioned the <br />outside storage of semis on the site and suggested that <br />provision be made for inside unloading. <br />Hartman reported that the condition of the Slumberland site <br />lowers property values in the area. <br />Terry Vitale, property owner in the area, pointed out that <br />the City had intended the area to develop as an industrial <br />park with a campus -type setting. Vitale stated that there <br />was to be some buffering provided by Slumberland to the <br />residential homes in the area, and Vitale felt that <br />Slumberland has not been a good neighbor. <br />Page -8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.