Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br />Position Profile <br />Little Canada <br />* Population dynamics suggested that on several matters, such as parks and <br />recreational facilities, there was a majority in favor of a more aggressive <br />approach. Younger professionals, renters, and blue collar households tend to <br />form the pro -parks coalition. <br />* Little Canada residents rated the quality of life in their City extremely high. <br />There was a general satisfaction about the way things were going for the <br />individual in this community. <br />* Overall, Little Canada has done a good job in handling change. But, as more <br />highly educated professional- technical families move into the community, <br />residential needs and preferences will change dramatically. Citizens want <br />increased city services and a commitment to augmenting the ambience of the <br />community. "Quality Growth," then, may be the by -words of the future: <br />targeting development in such a way as to preserve and enhance a natural <br />environment for recreation and to avoid an undue drain on the provision of City <br />services. <br />* Because they did not see their taxes as excessively high, Little Canada residents <br />were not dogmatically anti -tax increase. They are willing to finance projects that <br />meet current needs. But, there was also some general discontent with the <br />services that are being provided by the City. <br />* City services in general did not measure up to the levels of approval found in <br />other communities. Code enforcement was found to be lagging by one -third of <br />the populace. Only street maintenance, snow plowing, and senior programs were <br />given ratings at or above the Metropolitan Area norms. Police protection and <br />fire protection, in particular, achieved one of the lowest satisfaction levels found <br />by the researchers outside the core cities. Street lighting, sewers and water, and <br />street reconstruction also raised a significant amount of ire. Overall, City <br />services need to be upgraded in Little Canada to protect the quality of life in the <br />community. <br />* There was a consensus on general needs and facilities requirements in Little <br />Canada. Although many sports attract varying degrees of enthusiasm, winter <br />recreational activities and nature areas have widespread and general support <br />among the citizenry. The study pointed up the fact that citizens desire and <br />would support an aggressive development and expansion program in these areas. <br />Strategic Planning <br />In the Spring of 1989, the City conducted a Council -staff retreat for the purpose <br />of establishing goals and setting priorities. The ten most important items <br />identified were: <br />* an aggressive park development program; <br />* more effective code enforcement, particularly in the nuisance area as well as <br />maintenance violations and compliance with City ordinance; <br />PAGE 4 <br />