Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />May 3, 1990 <br />DeLonais replied that such activity may be a permitted <br />use as a home occupation as long as there is no extra <br />traffic created by delivery trucks going back and forth <br />to the home. <br />The City Planner reported that a home occupation is <br />permitted as long as there are no employees other than <br />the occupant, no retail traffic to and from the home as <br />well as no noise, outdoor storage or signage. <br />Townsley stated that he did not want to see the site <br />redevelop with a convenience store and asked that the <br />City retain some control over the property. <br />Mrs. Haram stated that she had no problem with the B -1 <br />zoning recommended by the City Planner as long as it <br />will satisfy the needs of the bank and the current <br />occupants in her building would be allowed to remain. <br />Herkenhoff recommended that the City Council rezone the <br />property located at 2700 Rice Street owned by Paul and <br />Susan Haram from R -1 to B -1 based on the recommendation <br />of the City Planner as contained in his report dated <br />April 30, 1990. <br />Motion seconded by Costa. <br />Motion carried 4 - 1. Drabik was opposed. <br />SIGN The City Planner reported that the City Council has <br />ORDINANCE asked for additional information on how other cities <br />address signage for shopping centers having frontage on <br />more than one street. The Planner reported that he has <br />not been able to complete this survey information, and <br />it was suggested that the matter be tabled until all <br />the information is received. <br />Gene DeLonais reported that this morning he drove <br />around and looked at 30 different shopping centers <br />reporting that there were many shopping centers with no <br />pylons and only tenant signs along the front of the <br />shopping center identifying the various businesses. <br />DeLonais went on to list the number of pylons at the <br />various shopping centers that he visited noting that <br />the vast majority had one pylon. DeLonais pointed out <br />that the City's Sign Ordinance allows one pylon per <br />shopping center by right and a second pylon by <br />conditional use permit. DeLonais felt that the City <br />should allow only one pylon per shopping center unless <br />Page 9 <br />