Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 14, 1990 <br />operation. Drabik also suggested height limitations on <br />the stockpiles as well as setbacks. <br />Frattalone stated that he would be willing to go along <br />with a one -year review period. Frattalone pointed out <br />that if the City had a problem with the operation <br />mid -term, the City had the right to shut him down. <br />However, Frattalone asked that any basis for shutting <br />the operation down be reasonable, and not the result of <br />unfounded complaints. Frattalone pointed out the <br />notice he got to shut -down based on Runestrand's <br />complaints as well as watermain concerns, which the <br />City Engineer determined were not a result of his <br />operation. <br />The City Planner suggested that restrictions on the <br />operation include complete screening of the stockpiles <br />from the centerline of the roadway so that the Building <br />Inspector can easily determine if the screening is <br />adequate by visual inspection; setbacks of 40 feet from <br />both streets and 20 feet from rear property lines, <br />watering and elimination of dust by paving of roadway <br />area. <br />Drabik stated that she would like the concrete pile <br />located in the back of the property. <br />The Planner reported that the City can require that the <br />unprocessed material be located in a certain section of <br />the property and this can be controlled with a site <br />plan. <br />Runestrand stated that she would be comfortable with a <br />yearly permit provided that all the conditions are met. <br />Runestrand stated that she is not joking about the dust <br />problem. It was her hope that some day the property <br />would be developed. <br />Frattalone stated that he was willing to make the <br />situation livable for his neighbors. <br />The Planner pointed out that the interim use is new in <br />the State and such an arrangement sets up a definite <br />termination date. If an interim use were approved, at <br />the termination date, the applicant has no guarantee <br />that the permit will be renewed. The Planner <br />recommended that should an interim use be approved, <br />that the term be set for something like five years <br />subject to certain criteria. If that criteria is not <br />met, the City would have the right to shut the <br />operation down. Review of the operation would be <br />constant. <br />Page 18 <br />