My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1991 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
04-24-1991 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2013 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
7/23/2013 10:28:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 11, 1991 <br />The City Planner did not believe there would be a <br />problem with truck traffic, but suggested that <br />employees of the industrial park would drive through <br />the residential neighborhood to and from work. <br />DeLonais asked the length of the cul -de -sac. <br />The City Planner replied that the cul -de -sac is <br />proposed at 1,000 feet. The maximum allowed under City <br />Code is 500 feet. <br />Garske pointed out that with the right -of -way in place <br />if the cul -de -sac situation does not work, the road <br />could always be connected to the industrial park in the <br />future. If the road is put all the way through, Garske <br />suggested that weight restrictions could be posted to <br />keep truck traffic off the road. <br />DeLonais asked about landscaping and buffering. <br />Welch described the berm that would be moved further <br />back on the property. Welch also proposed landscaping <br />and some fencing on the berm. Welch pointed out that <br />the development agreement will address landscaping, and <br />as each building permit is pulled, the lot would have <br />to be landscaped in compliance with the covenants set <br />up in the development agreement. Welch reported that <br />Bill Sanders has suggested that a fence not be <br />installed the entire length of the berm, but rather <br />natural landscaping be used. <br />Leo asked the height of the berm. <br />Welch replied that at its lowest point the berm would <br />be 6 feet in height, and 10 feet at its highest point. <br />These details are being worked out with the City <br />Engineer. <br />Keis asked who would be responsible for maintenance of <br />the fence. <br />Welch pointed out that due to this concern, Bill <br />Sanders is suggesting the use of natural landscaping. <br />Joe Fasciana stated that he would like to see the berm <br />constructed as high as possible. <br />Welch pointed out that the higher the berm, the more <br />the berm will cut into backyard areas due to the <br />required slope that must be maintained. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.