07-24-1991 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 903.020.F.9. does, however, provide for special fences to be erected that differ in construction, height or length in any zoning district by issuance of a conditional use permit. It would be more appropriate for this application to proceed as a conditional use permit application rather than a variance request. This report shall review this application against CUP criteria. In reviewing this request, the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects to the proposed conditional use. Its judgement shall be based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The request is not changing the use of the land, only adding an improvement to an existing condition. The request is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed site is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Even though the property is zoned B -W, the Land Use Plan does not prohibit or suggest removal of existing residential uses. This application again is not a change of use and therefore is not inconsistent with future land uses in the area. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed fence must comply with all applicable requirements set forth in Section 903.020.F. Fences. As proposed, the fence complies with locational requirements set forth. The remaining requirements will be satisfied at time of building permit application. 4. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The fence addition will not depreciate values in the area. 5. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. This request has no effect on the City's service capacity. 2 Page 20