My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1992 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-26-1992 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2013 2:56:02 PM
Creation date
8/7/2013 2:54:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 27, 1991 <br />Mr. Biesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91 -11 -397 - CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR <br />WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1991, AT 7:30 P.M. TO CONSIDER <br />AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN TO SHOW THE <br />SOUTH SIDE OF LITTLE CANADA ROAD AREA ALONG ROUND LAKE <br />AS OPEN SPACE BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, Hanson, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />APPEAL OF Hanson opened the public hearing to consider the appeal <br />DENIAL OF of Conditional Use Permit and Variance to the Code to <br />VARIANCE & allow improvements to a property in excess of 50% of <br />CUP - 34 fair market value of non - conforming structure at 34 <br />LITTLE Little Canada Road submitted by Jim Marshall. <br />CANADA RD. <br />The City Planner reported that at the Planning <br />Commission meeting Mr. Jim McBride, representing Jim <br />Marshall, indicated verbally that they were withdrawing <br />the appeal of Council denial. McBride had indicated <br />that they planned to pursue the matter by repairing the <br />structure to meet UBC requirements, and would be <br />applying for a building permit for these repairs. The <br />Planner reported that at that meeting he requested that <br />Mr. McBride or Mr. Marshall submit the withdrawal in <br />writing. However, no written withdrawal has been <br />received, therefore, the application is still active. <br />There was no one from the general public present <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Biesener, seconded by Scalze, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91 -11 -398 - DENYING THE APPEAL OF <br />PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION DENYING APPLICATION FOR <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE IN ORDER TO MAKE <br />IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STRUCTURE AT 34 LITTLE CANADA ROAD <br />IN EXCESS OF 50% OF FAIR MARKET VALUE BASED ON THE <br />RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE FACT <br />THAT NO NEW INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED RELATIVE TO <br />THIS MATTER <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Page 3 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.