Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 11, 1992 <br />parking. DeLonais stated that most other Rainbow Foods <br />do not have green area adjacent to their buildings. <br />Stellick stated that if Rainbow does expand, he does <br />not know how they will want to expand, what kind of <br />parking layout they might want, etc. <br />DeLonais suggested that Stellick utilize "The Baby <br />Room" signage for Snyders until these details are <br />worked out. Once they are, DeLonais suggested that <br />Stellick come back with a proposal for how he would <br />like the signage to work. DeLonais suggested that it <br />might be feasible to install a second pylon sign near <br />the Burger King site. <br />Stellick thought a second pylon would block visibility <br />of the existing pylon. Stellick reported that all <br />tenants want as much signage as they can get. It is <br />not practical to give all tenants signage on Rice <br />Street, but there is the need to address signage for <br />the anchor tenants. <br />Stellick again explained his proposal for placing an <br />identification sign on top of the existing Rainbow <br />sign, and utilizing the panels currently identifying <br />the shopping center to identify Snyders. <br />Keis asked if the message board was necessary. <br />Stellick reported that the message board is highly <br />used, and felt that tenants would not be pleased if it <br />were removed. <br />Keis stated that he had no problem with allowing a <br />small sign on top of the Rainbow Foods sign which would <br />identify the shopping center, but suggested that there <br />be no additional changes to the pylon unless it is <br />brought into conformance with City Codes. <br />There was no one present wishing to comment on this <br />matter. <br />Keis recommended approval of a variance to the Sign <br />Ordinance to allow for an additional identification <br />sign on top of the existing pylon sign for The Market <br />Place Shopping Center at 2900 Rice Street as requested <br />by Mr. Jim Stellick subject to there being no <br />additional signage allowed without the approval of the <br />City. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />Page 3 <br />