Laserfiche WebLink
PUD /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />The applicant has requested a Planned Unit Development Conditional <br />Use Permit to allow flexibility from the strict terms of the <br />Ordinance (i.e., private streets, interior setbacks, etc.). <br />Evaluation Criteria. The same evaluation criteria as utilized for <br />rezoning requests, as listed on page 2, is used in consideration of <br />conditional use permits. If the City approves the rezoning <br />request, it has essentially approved the proposed use of the <br />property in question. As such, specific review of the development <br />proposal will focus upon project details and conformance to <br />applicable development standards. <br />Development Density. Within the proposed R -2 zoning designation, <br />a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet per unit is required. <br />With a total area of ± 16 acres, the base zoning for the site would <br />allow 47 units. The site is, however, also subject to the <br />requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. It should be recognized <br />that shoreland density calculations are dependent upon an exact <br />determination of the ordinary high water level (OHWL). Because the <br />submitted concept plan does not specify the OHWL, the following <br />calculations (per new shoreland regulations) must be considered <br />only as approximations. <br />The subject property is on a Recreational Development Lake and is <br />in two tiers. <br />Tier 1 (267 feet from ordinary high water level) <br />155,000 SF riparian divided by 35,000 = 4 lots <br />171,700 SF non - riparian divided by 26,000 = 7 lots <br />SUB -TOTAL 11 lots <br />Tier 2 <br />370,260 SF non - riparian divided by 26,000 = 14 lots <br />TOTAL 25 LOTS <br />Based on the preceding calculation, the developer would be <br />permitted to construct 25 dwelling units upon the subject site. <br />It should be noted that the Shoreland Ordinance allows for an <br />increase in the allowable density. This is an option available <br />only upon City approval and contingent upon a 25 percent increase <br />in OHWL setback requirements and demonstration that waterbody <br />impact is reduced. <br />4 <br />Page 79 <br />