My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-1993 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
07-28-1993 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 2:28:07 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 2:26:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Utilizing the PUD multipliers established by the Model Shoreland <br />Ordinance, a total of 45 units may potentially be allowed upon the <br />subject property, as calculated below. <br />PUD Multiplier: <br />11 lots x 1.5 = 17 lots <br />14 lots x 2 = <br />28 lots <br />45 lots permitted under PUD <br />It should be noted that the applicant has not, to date, submitted <br />any plans to warrant the allowance of 45 lots upon the subject site <br />(i.e., erosion control, storm water management, etc.). <br />Setbacks. According to the Zoning and Shoreland Ordinance, <br />periphery setbacks in a PUD must be the same as that imposed in the <br />base zoning district (R -2) or if more restrictive, the Shoreland <br />Ordinance. <br />All proposed periphery setbacks have been found to conform to the <br />following Ordinance requirements. <br />Required Setback Proposed Setback <br />Front Yard 30 feet 55 feet <br />Side Yard 15 feet 30 feet <br />Rear Yard 30 feet N/A <br />From OHWL 75 feet 90 feet <br />From Bluff 30 feet N/A <br />NOTES: Standards per Model Shoreland Ordinance. <br />OHWL not verified. <br />In regard to interior site setbacks, the Ordinance states that <br />within a PUD, no building may be located less than 15 feet from the <br />curb line of an interior private street. The Ordinance also states <br />that no building within a PUD may be nearer to another building <br />than one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. <br />While the proposed twin homes appear to meet interior street <br />setback requirements, a determination cannot be made in regard to <br />building separation compliance until such time as building <br />elevations are submitted. <br />Subdivision. To accommodate the development proposal, a <br />subdivision of the property will be necessary. The developer <br />wishes to subdivide the subject property in a manner where lots are <br />to underlay building footprints. Areas surrounding the townhomes <br />would likely be owned in common by a homeowners association. The <br />anticipated platting technique is considered typical of townhome/ <br />condominium developments and is considered generally acceptable <br />5 <br />Page 80 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.