06-23-1993 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1993 Keis asked how much of the site is currently paved. Rustad reported that the area west of the building is paved. Rustad also suggested that it would be nice to have the street extend by the front of the property. The Planner felt that a street improvement would be done if the sewer went in. Rustad pointed out that there is only one other property owner that would be involved in a sewer and street improvement, and Rustad did not believe that property owner would be in favor of such an improvement. However, Rustad indicated that R & S would support the improvement. Keis asked if R & S planned to pave the back of their property. Rustad replied that they will do whatever the City requires, however, did not believe that additional parking was needed. The City Planner reported that the ordinance requires 36 parking spaces, although the sketch plan shows 39. However, if the property owner demonstrates that the need is less, a proof of parking arrangement could be worked out where less spaces would be required. Keis asked about encroachment on the NSP easement. Rustad indicated that there would be no problem getting a document allowing the encroachment, pointing out that the same thing was done in 1984 and 1988. The City Planner suggested that the Commission could give concept approval to the PUD amendment at this point pending submission of a detailed plan showing parking and curb areas, landscaping, drainage, etc. Mr. Garske recommended concept approval of the application for amendment to PUD to allow for the expansion of an existing building as well as allow a change in current parking plan for the property, with the indication that final consideration will be made at the July meeting pending submission of detailed plans as requested by the City Planner. Motion seconded by Knudsen. Motion carried 7 - 0. Page 6